Quote:
Originally Posted by galleyfox
I most support the casino going on land with lower prospects for development in this century.
I oppose a casino going on the 78 unless it’s on the level of Singapore’s Marina Bay Sands. A low-rise casino complex with a single tower or two is a waste of high-potential land. The 78 is perfectly capable of creating a high rise river canyon on its own.
As for Hard Rock, the CEO claimed Friday that the project would be “many, many billions”, so it sounds pretty substantial.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cas...o-license/amp/ |
Exciting times. It feels like this is finally going to happen.
I'd love details of all of the bids when they are ready and I hope they keep it open to the public eye.
If a home town insider takes this and a Hard Rock or someone else is clearly better, sunshine and light is the best way to clear the room for clarity.