[pilsenarch]

ok, i am totally in agreement with saving prentiss (sp?) as an icon of chicago architecture... (don't u love the post a couple earlier that thinks it's butt f**k ugly?)

what i don't understand is why there isn't more confrontation with NW regarding the SIGNIFICANT amount of development potential on properties they already own in streeterville

AND

the other surprising thing is how young a building prentiss is... correct me if i'm wrong, but it was built in the 70's? my point is, more reason to save it... green roofs? how about not tearing down totally functioning, well-built architecture...