![]() |
The first time I've ever seen 1950s boxes look even the slightest bit noirish...
http://img820.imageshack.us/img820/1...958century.jpg 1958 Century City model, USC. Also, lots more (daytime) images of this model can be seen in the LAPL's collection. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
.
I’m crossing my fingers that the “Noirish” community can help me to identify the PLACE where this photo (see below) was taken. A quick background: I’m an amateur historian whose focus is on one building in downtown Los Angeles-- the James Oviatt Building. In 2008, I researched, wrote and produced a feature-length documentary about the Oviatt Building’s history. (Predictably, it’s titled “The Oviatt Building”.) At present, I am researching / writing a biography of James Oviatt. The photo below was taken in January 1933 for an unnamed newspaper or magazine. In the foreground, it shows Albert (“Al”) Kaufman, Paramount Pictures’ production head; actor Maurice Chevalier; and James Oviatt. I’ve tried and failed to identify the building where they are. A studio commissary? The interior does not match those of any ‘30s commissaries I’ve seen. A restaurant / nightclub in Hollywood? I think so, but again … no dice finding corresponding photos. Do the Deco murals on the wall ring a bell for anyone? This picture’s original 1933 caption gives two clues: it says that the location was in Hollywood, and that a “stag party” was being held there that night. Any help would be greatly appreciated! http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...U641462INP.jpg (Corbis Images) |
:previous:
I can't help any with the location, but I find the expressions on some of the men to be quite interesting. Kaufman and the man two heads to the right of him are both looking quite intently at something/someone (considering it's a stag party, we can guess whom that might be, can't we?) and the guy in between them seems to not want to see whatever it is...or to not be caught on camera looking. ;) |
.
True! Meanwhile, Maurice Chevalier seems to be more into James Oviatt, and Oviatt is chuckling at Kaufman's 'concentration'. But ... where are they? |
Duh.
|
Quote:
|
Wha...? No, no, no. My 'Duh' was self directed. I'd too-quickly posted and ended up saying something you had both already alluded to. As for location, I was thinking perhaps the Masquer's Club or the Friars?
|
Quote:
|
Downtown Los Angeles 1899
.
|
Beautiful shot of Hollywood Blvd and Highland Ave, 1953
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7213/7...3dd56154_b.jpg
Hollywood Blvd from the roof of the Roosevelt Hotel, Dec, 1953 Looking down at intersection of Hollywood and Highland, Hotel Hollywood left/center, Graumann's out of frame left bottom. image from Metro Transportation Library and Archive |
Quote:
|
|
|
Quote:
For some reason Monkey Island seems to have gripped the consciousness of some Noirish readers...I have to admit that I've had a "monkey" on my back about this place. :sly: I've spent hours comparing this old photo to modern maps, and have driven the area, trying to ID the streets and buildings on Cahuenga Blvd. West, which is across the freeway in this shot. Yes, I think Monkey Island was on that strip between the 101 and Cahuenga Blvd. West, or more precisely, a few hundred feet to the left. (Mind you, it was demolished long before this photo was taken.) Some other reference points, FWIW: The relatively new bridge over the 101 to the Universal theme park now crosses the freeway here and connects with the dirt road in the foreground. Today it would crash through the left side of the photo. In the upper section of the shot, just right of center, the small road heading up the hill is Broadlawn and the road that slopes up towards the upper right and then swings left is Multiview. The Oak-Crest Market, which we've seen on Noirish before, would be on Cahuenga West off frame to the left, and if it's old enough, it would have looked almost straight at Monkey Island for the few brief years of MI's existence. I think I'm done with this topic but one question haunts me. When MI was demolished, in about 1941...what happened to those hundreds of monkeys??? (P.S. Loved the giant photo of DTLA.) |
Quote:
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-R...rangers-01.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] Mid construction: https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-j...rangers-02.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] The nearly complete house at the end of the movie. Not bad! https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-3...rangers-03.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-r...rangers-04.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-6...rangers-05.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] I was also fascinated with one scene shot at a restaurant on Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu. Can't quite make out what that sign says. Does anyone recognize it? https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-T...rangers-06.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] Here's Kim Novak driving south on PCH away from the restaurant. I assume that mailbox on the far right gives us the restaurant's address. https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-0...rangers-07.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] One final frame grab looking north on Wilshire Blvd. at Santa Monica Blvd., with the Beverly Hilton looming in the background. https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-l...rangers-08.jpg [source: dvd released by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment] PS - On an unrelated note, I'm still drooling over those gorgeous photos of the Western Airlines offices. Why can't we have beautiful architecture like that any more? |
|
Quote:
http://i48.tinypic.com/2jiqn7.jpg |
Quote:
I also wonder who was responsible for its destruction. Was it the landlord, insisting that the space be restored to its original bare state? Could be. On the other hand, maybe it was Western Airlines itself, thinking that they couldn't leave such an eye-catching treasure for a competitor to use for their commercial advantage. If so, that's not quite as bad as what Atlantic-Richfield did to their architectural masterpiece, but it'd be close. -Scott |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.