You guys are all mad from the perspective of the city or of simply liking skyscrapers. That's fine. But Reilly doesn't work for you. He works for the people in his ward. If they like him shooting this down, guess what, he's doing his job well. You don't have to like it. You can kick and scream about it. But that doesn't change anything about whether or not he's representing his constituents accurately.
|
^^ damn, kamin sounds legit pissed.
and very publicly so, directly calling out rahm at the end of his column. it'll be interesting to see where this goes. |
Quote:
It's a bitch move... One again. |
Quote:
And that condo development needs to be bulldozed pronto |
Quote:
|
Quote:
one lone individual should not be granted sole development approval rights. not only is it a stupid arrangement, it's also a system that is extremely ripe for all kinds of corruption. |
Alright Kamin!
One of the best articles he's written in a while. I'd be pissed too. He literally just wrote that article about Cityfront Plaza a few days ago and here comes ass-stankin Reilly doing exactly what Kamin warned about. Yeah, I agree that even Reilly has to rethink this shit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Any and all approvals of zoning and land use should not be at the whims of a single person, even if he is representing his constituency |
Quote:
it's not about reilly or his constituents, it's the whole idea of "aldermanic prerogative" that's the issue. these kinds of decisions shouldn't be in the hands of just one individual. chicago is the only (corrupt-ass) city that i know of that still does development approval so ass-backwardly like this. however, with kamin so publicly calling out rahm, i won't be surprised if reilly is gonna get a little talking to on this one. reilly is generally a fuck, but this is really low, even for him. |
:shrug: The Chicago Way. I don't see you guys complaining about it when it's something you want to go up that gets approval. Perhaps you can point me to one of those posts? If you're okay with it when it pushes through things you want, you have to take the bad with the good. I think the only reason anyone is upset is because you guys wanted this to go up. So did I. But let's not pretend there's any higher motivation beyond that, especially if you're conceding you don't really care what the people in the ward want.
|
Quote:
maybe you're just unfamiliar with humans, but that's not how our species is wired. it is possible to both be pleased that many developments do happen under the current crap-tacular system that we have and to also still wish to see a better system for development approval put in place. those are not mutually exclusive positions. |
^ As they say, a broken clock is right twice per day
|
Quote:
Downtown Chicago is not a provincial gated community. It's a vibrant urban crossroads and all major developments within its borders should be regulated by a panel that doesn't have answer to a small group of millionaires but rather the public at large. |
I think the solution would be for Related to buy the town homes and then tear them down to widen the street as well as making it a more accessible area to people rather than making it a gated community. I know this is easier said than done, but if Related is serious about this project, then those town homes will have to go.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's fine if you're upset this project has hit a snag; I like it a lot, too. But all this bitching about Reilly is really weird and misplaced at best, at worst just an emotional response that's not rooted in any rationality. The guy is doing what the people in the ward want. You might say they're dickheads, but it's their ward, not yours or mine. Does anyone have any plans to move there or do we just like walking around their neighborhood sometimes, seeing the pretty pictures, and enjoying the view when we're on the LSD? |
Quote:
The first thing I thought when I read about this was "what a dick" because he actually represented me for many years and I remember him making decisions that many of my neighbors and I would talk about - and the consensus was that most of us were not even being asked what we thought about these things in the first place. Maybe it's the residents, but this isn't the first thought that comes into my head when I hear other aldermen reject things. Reilly though? Yeah - after living in his ward for many years, that's basically the first thought that comes to my head with that guy. I have also suggested things to his office and each response basically showed me that he's an asshole. Regardless, I'm still curious what the objections against a 175 key hotel are in this spot. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Put in a couple nice mid-rises with some Ogden Slip-facing restaurant spaces. |
Quote:
No, the only thing that *might* happen here is that Rahm might gently point out to Reilly that kowtowing to NIMBYs, especially in violation of widely-accepted planning goals, is a bad look. Nobody wants to be the guy that killed a park because rich fatcats complained. Also, though: way to grow a backbone, Kamin! I’ve never seen him take a stand this strongly, even for preservation battles like Prentice or Thompson Center. Usually he tries to stay above the fray. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.