![]() |
Re: Orlando SunRail
It is a phased opening, but the total mileage is actually 61 miles. Phase I (operational 2014): 31 miles Phase II (operational 2016): 30 miles http://www.orangecountyfl.net/Portal...stemMap607.jpg |
I updated the list to add Denver Gold & NW commuter rail, San Francisco BART to Berryessa, and San Francisco Central subway LRT. I also added a note specifying that the Orlando commuter rail is phase 1 only (similar to my note for the DC Silver line).
San Francisco SMART will go on in 2 weeks. |
The partially privately funded Delmar Loop streetcar is scheduled to break ground this fall. It's going to use renovated St. Louis Car Company vehicles instead of the Skodas.
http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townn...8d36.image.jpg http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townn...8d36.image.jpg UNIVERSITY CITY • The Loop Trolley project, having amassed almost all the $43 million it needs, is ready to move into high gear. Construction is expected to begin late this year, with the trolleys in operation about a year later. When completed, the 2.2-mile system connecting the Delmar Loop to Forest Park will look a lot like the system that ran on St. Louis streets a half-century ago. In a big change of plans, old, renovated streetcars will be used instead of pricier electric/battery cars. And the system will be powered by overhead electric lines running above Delmar Boulevard and DeBaliviere Avenue, like St. Louis' old streetcar system. Read more: http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/m...#ixzz1rwJjxvGE |
Just an update, and yeah no shovels in the ground yet. The planning has hit a milestone, though.
|
Great thread! It's impressive to see all the passenger rail construction going on across the country. (400+ miles!)
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
It's so great to finally see Cincinnati on a list of cities currently building rail! It's been a long time coming...
For those who haven't seen it in my Cincinnati Development thread, here is a rendering of the rolling stock selected for the Cincinnati Streetcar (made by CAF in Elmira NY). http://i1132.photobucket.com/albums/...llingStock.jpg Source: http://www.urbanohio.com/forum2/inde...cseen.html#new Also, Cincinnati is already applying for funds for further streetcar extensions. |
Quote:
I'll change the list. |
Quote:
I'm a big fan of the Transport Politic site by the way |
Quote:
If it's only 2.2 miles, it would take very little to maintain frequent service. Assume 4.5 miles round trip including turnarounds at either end. That shouldn't take more than 25-30 minutes for a round trip. That would mean only 5-6 streetcars would be required for 5 minute headways. Even if there is a short layover at either end, 7 streetcars should be enough to maintain 5 minute service. |
I'm sure this question from laymen like myself has been answered many times in this forum before, and for the repetition I apologize. But I'm curious. What is the technical difference between light rail and streetcar? I see that Cincinnati's U/C system is qualified as streetcar, but in the rendering the cars look almost identical to Houston's, which is qualified as light rail.
|
Yeah that some light rail-y rolling stock in Cincinnati. I think that's cool, though. I always forget how big modern streetcars are.
|
Quote:
The only true common differences between the two are (1) Light rail trains don't share lanes with other traffic while streetcars will. (2) Light rail trains can use multiple units while streetcars don't. (3) Streetcars can turn tighter curves than light rail trains. And I don't think those common differences are 100% true for every case. Because light rail are ran in multiple units, they're called trains instead of cars. They can also be used in longer corridors which require larger capacity trains. And because the trains are longer, they require dedicated lanes. Therefore, it's function of the rail line more than the rolling stock equipment that makes the difference. Because, for all practical purposes, a streetcar is a single light rail unit, or vice versa, a light rail train is two or more streetcars coupled together. |
Quote:
Article from the Seattle Times: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...eetcar11m.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
"Light rail" as we know it in this country originally grew out of an attempt to use streetcar vehicles as if they were heavier rapid transit lines. |
Cirrus - back on Denver. If you're going to include the NW commuter rail, then you probably need to include the North commuter rail and the I-225 light rail. Both of those are closer to shovels in the ground than the NW line. (RTD's received unsolicited PPP proposals for both, so those two could very well start soon, even if the second ballot initiative fails.)
Or you can drop the NW rail, I'm fine with that too. |
I had originally left NW off, but SnyderBock indicated it should be on.
I want to be fairly strict with things being under construction, though. There are so many in planning that the list would look a lot different if it includes things that haven't broken ground yet. So I'll remove it. Is it just the 5 miles of the NW line that needs to come off? |
Quote:
East is 22.8 miles, Gold is 11.2 miles. So however you label it, 40.2 miles is fair to say are "under construction." EDIT: Which I think is what you had to begin with, I just wasn't adding up the mileages. My bad. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.