SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   City Discussions (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   How Is Covid-19 Impacting Life in Your City? (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=242036)

Pedestrian Jun 9, 2021 8:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 9305906)
It’s certainly the latter, as well as the testing causing panic over “variants” that don’t really matter.

The evidence is growing that the delta variant from India that has taken over Britain matters very much, especially if the English had been unable to catch up giving out second doses (though they seem to be doing pretty well at that).

Quote:

Studies also show that two doses of the Pfizer or AstraZeneca shots are effective against the Delta strain, according to the National Institutes of Health.

Two doses of the Pfizer vaccine were shown to be 88% effective against the Delta variant, while two doses of the AstraZeneca shot were shown to be 60% effective against the strain, according to NIH data.

Fauci stressed the importance of getting two doses after NIH studies showed that, three weeks after being given, just one dose of either vaccine provided only 33% efficacy against the Delta variant.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/fauc...n-america.html

This means that in Canada, for example, if the delta strain were to get a foothold, it could cause a dramatic spike in cases because while 57.5% have received one or more doses (more than in the US now), only 5.8% have received a second dose. The numbers in Britain used to be like that also but no longer: They have made a big push to get those second doses into people. And the continued restrictions on peoples' activity, which are being so criticized here, seem designed to give them time to do that.

It's depressing when people post what they really don't understand.

SIGSEGV Jun 9, 2021 8:51 PM

Made it to Kangerlussuaq, and swiftly placed into the quarantine dorm where I will remain for the next 5 days. I'm allowed out of my room to go to the bathroom, do laundry, and go on solo exercise, with restrictions:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/pw...-no?authuser=0

MonkeyRonin Jun 9, 2021 9:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306893)
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/fauc...n-america.html

This means that in Canada, for example, if the delta strain were to get a foothold, it could cause a dramatic spike in cases because while 57.5% have received one or more doses (more than in the US now), only 5.8% have received a second dose. The numbers in Britain used to be like that also but no longer: They have made a big push to get those second doses into people. And the continued restrictions on peoples' activity, which are being so criticized here, seem designed to give them time to do that.

It's depressing when people post what they really don't understand.


62.6% and 8.8% now, respectively.

Regardless, once even a single dose of vaccination is taken into account, case numbers on their own don't mean much anymore. A 33% efficacy against symptomatic illness with the Delta variant still provides >33% protection against serious illness resulting in hospitalization or death.

Case in point: infection numbers are on the rise in the UK, but hospitalizations and deaths have not followed suit (also in part because the rise has been in under-30s, who are largely still not eligible for their first dose there). Covid cases without serious illness or death aren't a problem.

Nite Jun 9, 2021 9:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306893)
The evidence is growing that the delta variant from India that has taken over Britain matters very much, especially if the English had been unable to catch up giving out second doses (though they seem to be doing pretty well at that).


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/fauc...n-america.html

This means that in Canada, for example, if the delta strain were to get a foothold, it could cause a dramatic spike in cases because while 57.5% have received one or more doses (more than in the US now), only 5.8% have received a second dose. The numbers in Britain used to be like that also but no longer: They have made a big push to get those second doses into people. And the continued restrictions on peoples' activity, which are being so criticized here, seem designed to give them time to do that.

It's depressing when people post what they really don't understand.

Well the numbers are actually 63% (72% above 12 years) with a first dose and 9% (10% above 12 years) with a second dose for Canada but by the end of July there will be enough vaccine to get up to 80% with both doses. per capita, Canada has the same amount of covid cases and much less deathS than the US currently. Cases are falling faster now in Canada than the US as well. Canada will most likely reach 70% (80% over age 12) for first dose and 30% (35% over age 12) by the end of June.

Pedestrian Jun 9, 2021 9:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin (Post 9306938)
62.6% and 8.8% now, respectively.

My source, which says what I said it says as of when I said it, is https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/c...-distribution/

Yours?

Quote:

Regardless, once even a single dose of vaccination is taken into account, case numbers on their own don't mean much anymore. A 33% efficacy against symptomatic illness with the Delta variant still provides >33% protection against serious illness resulting in hospitalization or death.

Case in point: infection numbers are on the rise in the UK, but hospitalizations and deaths have not followed suit (also in part because the rise has been in under-30s, who are largely still not eligible for their first dose there). Covid cases without serious illness or death aren't a problem.
I don't see this as an issue. Nobody disagrees you are better off with even just 33% protection but the point is that the delta variant seems significantly more resistant to the immunity conferred by existing vaccines and especially if you've had only one dose. So 10023 is quite wrong that the variants don't matter.

Furthermore, it is in exactly the environment like the UK where one strain, the so-called UK variant, was dominant and now that is being replaced by another variant, the delta strain, that you can get multi-variant strains which are potentially the most dangerous of all.

So it makes sense to do what the UK has done: suppress social interaction as much as possible until as many people as possible can be fully vaccinated. "As many people as possible" doesn't mean everybody and perhaps it can be said that you have reached that point when the rate of vaccination slows dramatically as it seems to be doing in the US (unless a new effort can re-energize it). But Britains still seem to be showing up for shots at a good rate so I don't think they are there yet.

Pedestrian Jun 9, 2021 9:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nite (Post 9306942)
Well the numbers are actually 63% (72% above 12 years) with a first dose and 9% (10% above 12 years) with a second dose for Canada but by the end of July there will be enough vaccine to get up to 80% with both doses. per capita, Canada has the same amount of covid cases and much less deathS than the US currently. Cases are falling faster now in Canada than the US as well. Canada will most likely reach 70% (80% over age 12) for first dose and 30% (35% over age 12) by the end of June.

Again: Your source?

Anyway, this isn't a Canada vs US contest. This is a question of whether variants matter and whether they matter more if you've only had a single dose, and they do.

In an environment where new variants are actively taking over and/or arrising, it's probably necessary to be more cautious about lifting social distancing measures.

10023 Jun 9, 2021 9:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306893)
The evidence is growing that the delta variant from India that has taken over Britain matters very much, especially if the English had been unable to catch up giving out second doses (though they seem to be doing pretty well at that).


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/fauc...n-america.html

This means that in Canada, for example, if the delta strain were to get a foothold, it could cause a dramatic spike in cases because while 57.5% have received one or more doses (more than in the US now), only 5.8% have received a second dose. The numbers in Britain used to be like that also but no longer: They have made a big push to get those second doses into people. And the continued restrictions on peoples' activity, which are being so criticized here, seem designed to give them time to do that.

It's depressing when people post what they really don't understand.

:rolleyes:

I don’t understand?

Cases are rising a bit but people are not, and will not, die in numbers that justify lockdowns because most of the vulnerable have been vaccinated, and the ones that haven’t have chosen not to be.

You are welcome to wear a mask and socially distance forever. I’m sure no one cares. For the rest of us this is over.

Nite Jun 9, 2021 9:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306987)
Again: Your source?

Anyway, this isn't a Canada vs US contest. This is a question of whether variants matter and whether they matter more if you've only had a single dose, and they do.

In an environment where new variants are actively taking over and/or arrising, it's probably necessary to be more cautious about lifting social distancing measures.

here is my source: https://covid19tracker.ca/vaccinationtracker.html

the CNN article is taking the numbers from the Government of Canada site which has stats which are 1 to 2 weeks old. The link above is updated every time the provinces report their daily updates.
Their sister site tracks covid infections across Canada as well: https://covid19tracker.ca/index.html

Pedestrian Jun 9, 2021 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 10023 (Post 9306997)
:rolleyes:

I don’t understand?

Cases are rising a bit but people are not, and will not, die in numbers that justify lockdowns because most of the vulnerable have been vaccinated, and the ones that haven’t have chosen not to be.

You are welcome to wear a mask and socially distance forever. I’m sure no one cares. For the rest of us this is over.

Death is not the only bad thing about having covid and what justifies what distancing measures is a matter of opinion. You've made it clear you think almost nothing does.

What you do keep ignoring is the oft-stated point that wearing a mask is not about self-protection as much as it is about protecting others. Therefore, you cannot "protect yourself" adequately by wearing one. The person sitting next to you on the bus or at the bar needs to be wearing one too.

It's not over until new cases are not a daily event. There are actually places in the US right now where that's true but not yet in the denser urban areas. If another 10% of the population or so would get vaccinated, we'd probably get there.

But I urge the unvaccinated to adopt your attitude. Go out there and get covid as soon as possible. That's the other way we can end it.

Pedestrian Jun 9, 2021 10:58 PM

Great news for 10023:

Quote:

San Francisco strip clubs will reopen next week - no masks or vaccination necessary
Joshua Bote
June 9, 2021
Updated: June 9, 2021 11:55 a.m.

San Francisco’s largest strip club owner is set to reopen many of its establishments once the state of California’s COVID-19 restrictions are fully lifted.

BSC Management, the management company for a vast majority of San Francisco’s adult entertainment venues such as the storied Condor Club, Larry Flynt’s Hustler Club and AfterDark, announced Wednesday that clubs “will be fully open to the public without restrictions” starting June 18. The management company owns 10 of San Francisco’s dozen or so nightclubs, according to the San Francisco Examiner . . . .
https://www.sfgate.com/local/article...P-CP-Spotlight

the urban politician Jun 9, 2021 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306893)
The evidence is growing that the delta variant from India that has taken over Britain matters very much, especially if the English had been unable to catch up giving out second doses (though they seem to be doing pretty well at that).


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/08/fauc...n-america.html

This means that in Canada, for example, if the delta strain were to get a foothold, it could cause a dramatic spike in cases because while 57.5% have received one or more doses (more than in the US now), only 5.8% have received a second dose. The numbers in Britain used to be like that also but no longer: They have made a big push to get those second doses into people. And the continued restrictions on peoples' activity, which are being so criticized here, seem designed to give them time to do that.

It's depressing when people post what they really don't understand.

More non-news from our in house Howard Hughes.

Nothing to see here. You continue to come from a position of dreaded "what-ifs" and cherry pick the news for like-minded articles

the urban politician Jun 9, 2021 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9306981)
I don't see this as an issue. Nobody disagrees you are better off with even just 33% protection but the point is that the delta variant seems significantly more resistant to the immunity conferred by existing vaccines

^ The delta variant is nothing of concern, and it is not more resistant to diddly squat. To the fully vaccinated public this is a non-issue, except for a few babbles from an old man in his basement who has declared that he will never ride in an Uber or a train again

Quote:

So 10023 is quite wrong that the variants don't matter.
The variants don't matter. 10023 is correct. Get the vaccine and live your life. Perhaps get a booster again in a year. And then a modified vaccine to address some new COVID strains in another few years.

Nothing more to see here.

Pedestrian Jun 10, 2021 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 9307106)
^ The delta variant is nothing of concern, and it is not more resistant to diddly squat. .

Sorry, but no virologist of significance agrees with you and I am beginning to feel sorry for your patients. They have a practitioner who doesn't believe in science it seems.

Now go do what you accuse me of doing and find the one virologist in America who denies the importance of the variants.

the urban politician Jun 10, 2021 1:02 AM

^ I believe in science more than you do, I just understand things with a clearer head than you do.

Discussions about viral mutation should be taking place in academic circles and among health care policy makers, not posted in scary after scary article by amateurish journalists and Internet forums by freaked out old men

Pedestrian Jun 10, 2021 2:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 9307216)
^ I believe in science more than you do, I just understand things with a clearer head than you do.

Discussions about viral mutation should be taking place in academic circles and among health care policy makers, not posted in scary after scary article by amateurish journalists and Internet forums by freaked out old men

So you can't find even one scientific source to argue variants don't matter. But I admit you are good at calling names ("freaked out old men") and other irrelevant, ugly clap-trap.

Meanwhile, here's a bit of science for you from the prestigious scientific journal Nature:

Quote:

24 May 2021
What scientists know about new, fast-spreading coronavirus variants

Since the SARS-CoV-2 variant known as B.1.617 was first reported in India late last year, it has spread to dozens of other countries — including the United States, Singapore and the United Kingdom, where it has become dominant in some regions.

Researchers have since identified three subtypes, known as B.1.617.1 (the ‘original’ B.1.617), B.1.617.2 and B.1.617.3, each with a slightly different genetic make-up.

They are now rushing to investigate these variants and work out how they might affect the trajectory of the pandemic in countries where they have gained a foothold. Key questions remain about how quickly the variants can spread, their potential to evade immunity and whether they cause more severe disease.

A lot of this research takes the form of standard epidemiology — confirming COVID-19 cases through testing, identifying the variants responsible for infections and cross-referencing these data to people’s clinical symptoms and vaccination statuses. Scientists can also glean insights from genomic-sequencing data, identifying which mutations are present in the B.1.617 subtypes and comparing these with mutations in earlier variants whose behaviour is better understood.

More transmissible
“I look at individual mutations because they each have individual properties that we think might confer higher transmissibility,” says Julian Tang, a consultant virologist at the Leicester Royal Infirmary, UK. Increased transmissibility — a measure of how quickly variants can spread from person to person — could accelerate outbreaks, which could put more pressure on health-care systems and counter-measures such as vaccination programmes. For example, the B.1.617.2 variant has mutations called 452R and 478K, which Tang says are both linked to increased transmissibility. Both mutations alter the spike protein, which the virus uses to enter human cells . . . .

In a report published on 12 May, A UK government advisory committee called the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational subgroup said there is a “realistic possibility” that B.1.617.2 is 50% more transmissible than B.1.1.7, according to the available data . . . .

Another question researchers are keen to resolve is whether vaccines will remain effective against the B.1.617 variants. If any of these strains can evade the immune protection conferred by vaccination, or by previous exposure to the virus, they could trigger significant new waves of infection and derail plans to relax lockdowns and other restrictions.

In theory, the accelerated spread of B.1.617.2 in the United Kingdom — where more than 50% of the population has received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine — could indicate an ability to escape vaccine protection. But Wenseleers says there is little evidence that vaccine escape is driving the increase in cases. Preliminary data from Bolton, an outbreak hotspot in northwest England, from mid-May showed that most people there who were hospitalized with COVID-19 caused by B.1.617.2 had not been vaccinated. Some 5 out of 18 hospitalized people testing positive for the variant had received a single vaccine dose, and just one had been given both doses.

Separate data analysed by Wenseleers showed that infections with the B.1.617.2 variant in northwest England were initially clustered in teenagers, who are not routinely vaccinated. Although the variant subsequently spread to people in their thirties and forties, those in their fifties — who are more likely to have had both vaccine doses — experienced lower rates of infection. “That is reassuring,” he says.

Genetic-sequencing data suggest that the rapid spread of B.1.617.2 is less likely to pose a problem to vaccination efforts than spread of B.1.617.1. The 452R and 478K mutations identified in B.1.617.2 are both linked to vaccine escape as well as increased transmissibility, says Tang. But B.1.617.1 also carries a different mutation called 484Q, which is more strongly associated with vaccine escape. This mutation isn’t found in B.1.617.2.

Reassuringly, no mutation in any of the B.1.617 variant subtypes is associated with increased disease severity, Tang says.

Researchers can also conduct laboratory tests to check how well antibodies neutralize different viral variants. A study published on 17 May in Nature Medicine suggests that such tests are “highly predictive” of real-world immune protection. Some of these lab studies indicate that vaccines could be less effective against the B.1.617.1 subtype1. Results from similar experiments with B.1.617.2 have not yet been published, but data released by Public Health England on 23 May suggest that the Pfizer–BioNTech and Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccines are effective against B.1.617.2 after two doses . . . .
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01390-4

But I would emphasize that the importance of variants lies not in the variants that have so far emerged, which do not seem to change the overall picture that people who are vaccinated are still well protected, at least from a public health standpoint, but in the potential for new and nastier variants to emerge in populations that have not been vaccinated, whether those populations are in countries like the US where millions have been but other millions have not or in places like the developing world where almost nobody has yet been.

the urban politician Jun 10, 2021 10:48 AM

^ Cool story.

Once again, a good topic to follow for the experts.

The general public, in their infinite ignorance, paranoia, and utter lack of perspective have no hope in interpreting the implications of any of this. Of that I am certain.

Now go back to double masking in your basement while ordering DoorDash for all of your meals

suburbanite Jun 10, 2021 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 9307445)
^ Cool story.

Once again, a good topic to follow for the experts.

The general public, in their infinite ignorance, paranoia, and utter lack of perspective have no hope in interpreting the implications of any of this. Of that I am certain.

Now go back to double masking in your basement while ordering DoorDash for all of your meals

The public has the right to whatever publicly available scientific information they want. Personal liberties and filtering news (because you don't like what conclusions people may draw from it) don't really go hand in hand. News articles may be trying to induce hysteria to sell, but as long as they are stating the facts about transmissibility and not saying it's 60% more contagious when it's actually 30, then that is entirely within their prerogative.

the urban politician Jun 10, 2021 1:08 PM

^ Sure they do. But just because they have a right to see the facts doesn’t mean that I expect any less than a clusterfuck of misinterpretation to come out of it.

Patients can see their own lab results almost instantly now, and I get questions about misinterpretations fearing worst case scenarios from normal or slightly abnormal lab results every single day.

This “have it your way”, “right to know” society is not really any better off or wiser than a time when we simply trusted the experts to make the right decisions. In my world I have a daily window into just how problematic it all is.

sopas ej Jun 10, 2021 3:36 PM

From ABC7:

California announces changes to mask guidance ahead of June 15 reopening

From Disneyland to big box stores like Target, we've broken down California's mask rules for when the state fully reopens.

By Josh Haskell
Wednesday, June 9, 2021 3:18PM

UPDATE: June 9, 2:30 p.m.: California officials have provided additional information about when masks will be required following the June 15 reopening date. Unvaccinated people will still have to wear masks in most indoor settings, Dr. Ghaly said in a teleconference. California is also requiring vaccinated people to wear masks in some high-risk settings, including on transit and in schools. See the full details on when you'll need a mask and how businesses are supposed to enforce the rules below.

California officially reopens next week on June 15 after over a year of restrictions and closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. So you can ditch your masks right? Not so fast.

Dr. Mark Ghaly, California's Health and Human Services Secretary, announced more details on what California's mask mandate will look like after the June 15 reopening.

Those fully vaccinated will be allowed to do almost everything they did pre-pandemic without wearing a mask including grocery shopping, drinking at a bar, and going to the gym.

If you're not vaccinated, you're still going to have to wear a mask in "indoor public settings." That includes grocery stores, shops, restaurants, movie theaters and other indoor businesses.

There are other situations and places where masks will be required regardless of vaccination status. It all can be a bit confusing, so we've broken down the rules below.

Masks still required for everyone in the following places in California:

Any form of public transportation (think commuter buses and railroad systems) including airports and planes. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) extended their mask requirement through September 13, 2021. So yes, you will be required to wear a mask for your next trip out of LAX, regardless of whether you are vaccinated or not.

Hospitals and long-term care facilities: Even if you are fully vaccinated, you are still required to wear a mask in healthcare settings like hospitals and long-term care facilities such as assisted living and nursing homes. When the new mask guidance for vaccinated individuals was initially released in May, the American Hospital Association (AHA) asked for a clarification to which the CDC emphasized that new masking recommendations for people fully vaccinated against COVID-19 do not apply to health care settings.

Indoors at K-12 schools and childcare facilities: Dr. Ghaly announced Wednesday that people, including teachers and students, who are vaccinated are still going to need to wear masks when they are indoors. However, they don't have to wear masks while outdoors, like on a playground.

Prisons and homeless shelters: In accordance with CDC guidance, masks will still be required in correctional and detention facilities as well as homeless shelters.

Indoor workplaces (with one important exception): Last Thursday, the California Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board approved controversial rules that will require masks to stay on in the workplace for the time being. The exception? Workers can go maskless only if every employee in a room is fully vaccinated against the coronavirus.

Disneyland: If you want to visit the most magical place on Earth, you're still going to need to mask up even after the June 15. The only thing that will change after California's reopening is that the capacity limits at Disneyland and Disneyland California Adventure will be lifted.

Masks required for unvaccinated individuals:

Dr. Ghaly announced that unvaccinated Californians will still have to wear masks at all indoor public settings, like stores, restaurants, salons and the like. This is an update that goes further than CDC guidance, which suggests masking but doesn't require it.

Additional information you should know regarding mega events:

Indoor mega events (examples: NBA games, Staples Center events, or any other indoor conventions, conferences, expos or concerts)
Verification of fully vaccinated status or pre-entry negative test result will be required of all attendees. If you do not meet these requirements, you will not be admitted to the event or venue.

Outdoor mega events (examples: MLB games at Dodger Stadium, Hollywood Bowl concerts or any music or food festivals, car shows, marathons, etc.)
Verification of fully vaccinated status or pre-entry negative test result will be strongly recommended for all attendees per state guidance, but not required. However, if you are not fully vaccinated nor have a pre-entry negative COVID-19 test, you will still be admitted to the event as long as you wear a mask.

How will businesses verify if customers are vaccinated or not?

If you don't need a mask when you're vaccinated, but you do need one if you're not -- how is a business supposed to know? They have three choices, according to Dr. Ghaly:

-Allow individuals to "self attest" they've been vaccinated
-Implement a vaccine verification system
-Require everyone to wear a mask

If a business has information posted visibly about the new guidelines (that unvaccinated people still need to wear masks) and someone walks into a business without a mask on, that should be interpreted as someone self attesting they are vaccinated, Ghaly said.

Link: https://abc7.com/california-mask-man...irus/10745411/

jd3189 Jun 10, 2021 6:12 PM

Let's see how things go. I will be coming back less than two weeks from now.

SIGSEGV Jun 10, 2021 9:03 PM

My condo board just sent out an email saying that masks will no longer be required indoors as of June 11 (Illinois Phase 5 day). We will continue to maintain single elevator occupancy and unvaccinated people are requested to continue to wear masks (kind of doubtful there are many in my building...). Anyway I won't be back until July 22nd so I guess I'll see how it goes!

Pedestrian Jun 10, 2021 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIGSEGV (Post 9308094)
My condo board just sent out an email saying that masks will no longer be required indoors as of June 11 (Illinois Phase 5 day). We will continue to maintain single elevator occupancy and unvaccinated people are requested to continue to wear masks (kind of doubtful there are many in my building...). Anyway I won't be back until July 22nd so I guess I'll see how it goes!

We are waiting for the SF Dept of Health to tell us what to do which they need to do before the state rules relax on June 15.

My main concern is the elevators. I don't trust the unvaxed, if any, to own up to it so I really don't want to ride in an elevator with people I don't know. But the rules in your building seem good and I hope we do something similar. I'm tired of wearing a mask to go to the trash room alone. I rarely even see anybody else in the hall.

JManc Jun 10, 2021 11:57 PM

I haven't worn a mask in three weeks.

chris08876 Jun 10, 2021 11:59 PM

NYC has been poppin' lately.

As the weeks go by, areas like TS see increases in folks.

;)

Happened to check the cams at just the right moment in space-time.

https://aws1.discourse-cdn.com/busin...f810c6a98.jpeg

Camelback Jun 11, 2021 12:34 AM

Is Covid really impacting anyone's lives in America at this point? I mean, really?

SIGSEGV Jun 11, 2021 1:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camelback (Post 9308278)
Is Covid really impacting anyone's lives in America at this point? I mean, really?

I mean, there were 449 new deaths today.

Camelback Jun 11, 2021 1:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIGSEGV (Post 9308310)
I mean, there were 449 new deaths today.

*deaths

mrnyc Jun 11, 2021 2:19 AM

well how ‘bout that -

the latest ohio vax-a-million winner is a greater clevelander kid:


https://twitter.com/GovMikeDeWine/st...158727168?s=20

twister244 Jun 11, 2021 5:20 AM

Every day here in Chicago feels more and more back to normal. I was in the West Loop tonight on a date, and it felt extremely lively, with very few people wearing masks around, with many not wearing them inside now.

SIGSEGV Jun 11, 2021 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9308192)
We are waiting for the SF Dept of Health to tell us what to do which they need to do before the state rules relax on June 15.

My main concern is the elevators. I don't trust the unvaxed, if any, to own up to it so I really don't want to ride in an elevator with people I don't know. But the rules in your building seem good and I hope we do something similar. I'm tired of wearing a mask to go to the trash room alone. I rarely even see anybody else in the hall.

It may be worthwhile telling your condo board that you'd prefer to keep single-party occupancy in elevators. At least in my building, it's hardly ever an inconvenience due to the elevator to resident ratio.

MonkeyRonin Jun 12, 2021 8:41 PM

Yesterday was the first day of Ontario's Stage 1 "reopening". At this point, only patios are open and non-essential is permitted to 15% capacity. Salons, gyms, etc. aren't opening until July, and "full" reopening won't happen until August. Which is of course some pretty insane risk-aversion given that we're already 72% vaccinated and averaging only 500 new cases/day - at this time last year things were substantially more open with a 0% vaccination rate.

Still, after enduring the world's longest lockdown (things have been shut in Toronto since last November, while we'll have been in some form of partial lockdown from September 2020-August 2021 when all is said & done), we'll take what we can get! The city feels positively euphoric right now. People have been largely disregarding the restrictions for months now, but now that there are actual things to do again, a great sense of liveliness has returned with it. Just being able to do simple things like eat on patio is enough to bring a tear to the eye. :happysad:


https://i.imgur.com/QaNOpgQ.jpg
https://www.blogto.com/eat_drink/202...ning-lockdown/

Pedestrian Jun 12, 2021 8:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIGSEGV (Post 9308625)
It may be worthwhile telling your condo board that you'd prefer to keep single-party occupancy in elevators. At least in my building, it's hardly ever an inconvenience due to the elevator to resident ratio.

I don't think it's been an inconvenience for us either. My building is doubtless bigger: 450 units. But we have a total of 6 elevators for those and I live on one of the two floors where they "rest" (that is where they automatically stay when not in use). I just wish we had stairs you could use at least to walk down (too exhausting to walk up regularly), but although we do have them for emergency use, they are alarmed with an awful shrieking siren when somebody goes out that way and opens the door on the street level.

Unfortunately, the building is "mixed use" with offices on the second floor and stores on the first. When those offices open back up and lots of people who don't live in the building start using the elevators to get to them, I foresee a problem. But we are having very few cases of covid these days (13-15 per day in the entire city) and maybe soon it will be none and everything, even the elevators, can go back to normal.

SIGSEGV Jun 12, 2021 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9309973)
I don't think it's been an inconvenience for us either. My building is doubtless bigger: 450 units. But we have a total of 6 elevators for those and I live on one of the two floors where they "rest" (that is where they automatically stay when not in use). I just wish we had stairs you could use at least to walk down (too exhausting to walk up regularly), but although we do have them for emergency use, they are alarmed with an awful shrieking siren when somebody goes out that way and opens the door on the street level.

Unfortunately, the building is "mixed use" with offices on the second floor and stores on the first. When those offices open back up and lots of people who don't live in the building start using the elevators to get to them, I foresee a problem. But we are having very few cases of covid these days (13-15 per day in the entire city) and maybe soon it will be none and everything, even the elevators, can go back to normal.

That's odd that they won't let you use your stairwells as non-emergency exits. Is it a security reason? It's usually more important to leave quickly to be on time somewhere than to get back to your unit quickly.

Pedestrian Jun 12, 2021 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SIGSEGV (Post 9310008)
That's odd that they won't let you use your stairwells as non-emergency exits. Is it a security reason? It's usually more important to leave quickly to be on time somewhere than to get back to your unit quickly.

Yes--security. We have 24/7 security and they want everybody coming and going from the residential part of the building to pass the security desk. Usually there are 3 guards on duty and when somebody sets off the alarmed doors they send one of them to investigate. But one always stays behind the desk you have to pass to enter or leave unless you want to set off the alarm (which I have done once or twice without consequence to me when I was in a huge hurry and the elevator just didn't come).

The exception to all this is if you take the elevator directly to the residential garage. That part of the garage has a security gate you need a key fob to enter so it's supposed to be secure although a few times somebody has snuck in after a car entered. In that case, they are usually immortalized on video.

Pedestrian Jun 12, 2021 10:42 PM

San Francisco's supposedly "terrible Tenderloin" on a covid Saturday afternoon (today):

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...537251/enhance

This is the part known as "Little Saigon", hence the Vietnamese dogs on pedestals.

Pedestrian Jun 13, 2021 12:15 AM

Quote:

Can the Castro get its groove back?
By Alex Barreira – Staff Reporter, San Francisco Business Times
Jun 10, 2021, 9:08pm EDT

. . . Amid the devastation of the pandemic, murals sprang up over the Castro, the historic heart of San Francisco’s LGBTQ community, including several dozen brought to life from local artists via the Castro Merchants Association and Castro LGBTQ Cultural District.

Now with Castro businesses entering what’s typically their peak season — Pride Month — and with the lifting of business restrictions June 15, they’re hoping their effort to spruce up the Castro with new art and improve street conditions will help the corridor draw in tourists and dollars it desperately needs. If they succeed, it just might be a model for recovery for the rest of San Francisco.

Such investments also help restaurants, retailers and nightlife facing a shortage of foot traffic and near total absence of tourist sectors.

Businesses and community organizations in the Castro have added their own spin to the city’s popular Shared Spaces program — which enables restaurants, retailers and others to expand their square footage into the street.

Every Sunday since last fall, the half block of Noe Street between Market and Beaver streets has been transformed into an open-air market for artisans hawking everything from psychedelic portraits to potted succulents. The three local organizers of the Noe Street Art Mart — Chris Hastings, owner and operator of the Lookout Bar, and friends Christopher Vasquez and Nicole Whitten — partnered with the Castro Merchants Association on the Shared Spaces permit . . . .

The closed street has been put to other creative uses as well — on May 22, Harvey Milk Day, the block hosted a celebration with speakers and DJs, and community groups also facilitated distribution of 200 doses of the Johnson & Johnson single-shot Covid-19 vaccine.

Vasquez said the organizers are trying to make the closed streets program ongoing after the permits expire at the end of June. Despite nominal reservations from a few Supervisors, the citywide Shared Spaces program appears likely to become a regular fixture of the new normal under legislation proposed by Mayor London Breed.

Other businesses have also sought out ways to bring foot traffic into the neighborhood and support the wider community of commerce. Since opening Bangin Hair Salon at 2253 Market St. last August, owner Diane Ramirez has used her parklet to host the occasional pop-up from neighborhood businesses without storefronts of their own.

Vendors have sold old-fashioned portraits, plants and vintage clothes, and Ramirez said the Shared Space has “made a big difference on the block,” creating a livelier atmosphere and drawing more potential customers to the neighborhood. Ramirez also used the parklet to host a bang-trim fundraising drive in support of an AAPI-focused foundation.

Ramirez said when she started negotiating her lease at the space in 2019, the gay bar Hi Tops was “the only energy” on a block surrounded by vacancies. Now in addition to Bangin Hair, the block has another new barber shop, Castro Barber Lounge, and Mexican restaurant and margarita bar Santeria . . . .

In addition to making the corridor more colorful, Castro community organizations and businesses have spent considerable energy over the past year lobbying the city for resources to improve street conditions, where homeless encampments and burglaries have been commonplace for years and surged during the economic distress and quieter streets of the pandemic.

Businesses are hoping the combination of those measures will make life easier for restaurateurs, retailers and residents alike and the streets more inviting for tourists.

In late February, Castro businesses reported racking up more than $135,000 in broken or vandalized storefront windows since January 2020. The data gathering effort led by the Castro Merchants Association was aimed at pressuring the city for reimbursement legislation similar to a $1,000 policy that went into effect in District 5 last year. In May, the wish came one step closer to fulfillment when Supervisor Rafael Mandelman introduced legislation to reimburse small businesses up to $2,000 for broken windows.

“It’s actually sad to see how many businesses have put up gates,” said Dave Karraker, owner of local MX3 Fitness, who said he still hears about broken windows from nearby businesses about once every two weeks. “All of them got tired of having their windows broken.”

Karraker added he’s hoping after June 15 boarded up storefronts will uncover and improve the neighborhood’s appeal to tourists.

The community has also upped its investment in neighborhood foot patrols from authorities such as the Patrol Special Police, a private, city-chartered security force, and unarmed Public Safety Ambassadors — at a total annual cost of about $270,000 funded by city grants and donations from residents and merchants . . . .

Another program in the works — similar to others around the city consisting of security cameras controlled by neighborhood organizations and that would be funded with a $695,000 grant from cryptocurrency billionaire Chris Larsen, per the Bay Area Reporter — is strongly supported by the CBD and is still being debated among the community . . . .

Businesses and community representatives say one thing holding back the neighborhood is a glut of retail vacancies. They attribute the vacancies to holdout landlords . . . .

Currently there are 51 vacancies along the neighborhood’s primary commercial streets of Castro, 16th, Church, Market Street and 18th — a vacancy rate of 26% — according to a count from boutique real estate company Maven Commercial. On Castro and Church Street the vacancy rate is 32% and 33%.

It’s worth noting some of these vacancies may have leases out for signature, permitting delays or other factors. But Aiello noted the vacancies are still a noticeable part of the corridor, and anecdotally she hasn’t seen asking rents lower to fill them.

A measure imposing an annual tax on retail landlords for storefronts empty for more than six months, passed with 70% approval from voters last year, but was shelved by the Supervisors this past June until 2022.

“We’ve had young new business owners interested in opening something up and they thought they’d have some great deal on rent and there isn’t any,” Aiello said. “Everybody still wants their $11,000-$12,000 a month and strong financing. That kind of money just isn’t around right now” . . . .

San Francisco Mayor London Breed is seeking $10 million in city funds to acquire a site to house a large-scale, freestanding LGBTQ history museum. The money would go toward the acquisition of a site yet to be identified or determined. A city official said a request for proposals will be issued if the money is approved, according to the Bay Area Reporter. The intention is to create a permanent home for the GLBT Historical Society, which operates a museum and archives out of two separate locations. The museum is in 1,600 square feet it subleases from Walgreen’s at 4127 18th St., but that sublease is up in January. The archives are at 989 Market St., with a lease through 2031. Efforts to find a larger or more permanent museum space have failed in the past.

The effort to create a memorial for assassinated San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk has new life, with organizers who have been working on the Castro project since 2016 offering a new, slimmed-down vision. The goal is to remake the plaza outside the Muni station at Market and Castro streets that was completed in 1980. Friends of Harvey Milk Plaza, the nonprofit behind the effort, have tapped landscape architect SWA to lead the design team, and the firm recently shared conceptual designs to honor the slain supervisor, the first openly gay man elected to office in California.
https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfranc...ide-event.html

Pedestrian Jun 13, 2021 12:26 AM

SF vaccination rates by neighborhood (range 82% in the Financial District and South Beach to 39% in the Lakeshore District in the far southwest corner of the city, a real standout underperformer.

https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...543786/enhance
https://data.sfgov.org/stories/s/uue2-6gdn

| = Castro/Upper Market

|| = Historically African-American Neighborhoods

||| = Lone Mountain/University of SF

LA21st Jun 13, 2021 12:30 AM

Westwood Village is starting to get more vibrant each weekend. Maybe more UCLA students are getting ready to return?

Westwood was one the deader parts of LA during peak covid, for obvious reasons.

TWAK Jun 13, 2021 3:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camelback (Post 9308278)
Is Covid really impacting anyone's lives in America at this point? I mean, really?

No, but if I visit Chicago I'm gonna wear my mask all over the suburbs!

SIGSEGV Jun 13, 2021 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9310026)
Yes--security. We have 24/7 security and they want everybody coming and going from the residential part of the building to pass the security desk. Usually there are 3 guards on duty and when somebody sets off the alarmed doors they send one of them to investigate. But one always stays behind the desk you have to pass to enter or leave unless you want to set off the alarm (which I have done once or twice without consequence to me when I was in a huge hurry and the elevator just didn't come).

The exception to all this is if you take the elevator directly to the residential garage. That part of the garage has a security gate you need a key fob to enter so it's supposed to be secure although a few times somebody has snuck in after a car entered. In that case, they are usually immortalized on video.

Maybe you guys can install one of those rotating cage they use at subway stations (where you can't go the other way due to bars) in the hallway leading up to an exit door. Although it's probably not that cheap.

Not sure how accurate this is, since the neighboring zip code is reporting over 100% wiith a first dose (could be a population change since the population base for the estimate thing), but according to https://data.cityofchicago.org/Healt...e-Do/c28u-q29v, my zip code has 99% of people with a first dose, and 85% fully vaccinated, so the residents in my building are overwhelmingly likely to be vaccinated (also gives you an idea of how few under-12's there are, I guess).

But many of the people come into my building (food or furniture delivery, contractors, movers, etc.) live elsewhere and may be less likely to be vaccinated, so I'm glad we're keeping the elevator occupancy requirement for now.

the urban politician Jun 13, 2021 1:01 PM

In the burbs of Chicago things are in full swing.

Went to an outdoor bar to grab a drink overlooking a gorgeous lake in Wauconda, IL and it was jam packed.

Then came back with the fam later on for dinner and they were “full”.

So we drove to another town, Mundelein, to an Italian restaurant downtown and were asked if we had a reservation. We said “no” and they said we could sit indoors but that the patio was booked (live band). Had a great time nonetheless.

Prior to Covid we were on top of weekend dinner plans and nearly always made reservations. I guess, with the pandemic, we had sort of forgotten about all of that stuff.

Life not being scared and paranoid like Howard Hughes is so wonderful! Great to be in the US right now, I’m so glad I’m not in Canada or the UK.

Camelback Jun 13, 2021 1:47 PM

The US recorded the lowest number of cases since March 19th, 2020.
The lowest number of *deaths* since March 25th, 2020. (*Unlike other countries, we actually count all deaths with Covid viral particles in the body, as a Covid death, whether or not Covid killed them).

https://media.giphy.com/media/hLUiXoGKNIVb2/giphy.gif
giphy

SIGSEGV Jun 13, 2021 3:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Camelback (Post 9310227)
The US recorded the lowest number of cases since March 19th, 2020.
The lowest number of *deaths* since March 25th, 2020. (*Unlike other countries, we actually count all deaths with Covid viral particles in the body, as a Covid death, whether or not Covid killed them).

https://media.giphy.com/media/hLUiXoGKNIVb2/giphy.gif
giphy

Weekend stats are generally worthless though and excess death data does not indicate that that COVID-19 deaths are systematically overestimated (see e.g. https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/h...-s-complicated as a good article on how COVID-19 deaths are counted) .

the urban politician Jun 13, 2021 3:33 PM

^ Why are weekend stats “worthless”?

SIGSEGV Jun 13, 2021 3:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 9310282)
^ Why are weekend stats “worthless”?

Reporting is very hit or miss on weekends and states/hospitals likely vary their policies with time (or randomly), so they're not very like for like compared to weekday stats. Best thing is to sum over a week.

I mean I don't deny that COVID deaths are slowly going down, they are, but focusing on weekend stats is misleading since they have much higher variance for reasons having nothing to do with COVID.

Steely Dan Jun 13, 2021 4:05 PM

7 day rolling average is the much more worthwhile stat compared against any single given day.

And going by the 7 day rolling average, US covid deaths are falling.

Tunnel, meet light.


Things are starting to feel awfully damn normal here in Chicago.

SteveD Jun 13, 2021 4:40 PM

Atlanta
 
Masks disappeared pretty quickly in Atlanta. They are still around, but much much less. Still quite a bit in grocery stores, and, I travel a lot, so still mandatory in airports and on flights, but in my little commercial node of East Atlanta Village, the bars and restaurants and shops are largely fully open and maskless now.

homebucket Jun 13, 2021 5:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the urban politician (Post 9310215)
In the burbs of Chicago things are in full swing.

Went to an outdoor bar to grab a drink overlooking a gorgeous lake in Wauconda, IL and it was jam packed.

Then came back with the fam later on for dinner and they were “full”.

So we drove to another town, Mundelein, to an Italian restaurant downtown and were asked if we had a reservation. We said “no” and they said we could sit indoors but that the patio was booked (live band). Had a great time nonetheless.

Prior to Covid we were on top of weekend dinner plans and nearly always made reservations. I guess, with the pandemic, we had sort of forgotten about all of that stuff.

Life not being scared and paranoid like Howard Hughes is so wonderful! Great to be in the US right now, I’m so glad I’m not in Canada or the UK.

Wauconda 4eva!!

Pedestrian Jun 13, 2021 7:33 PM

While, when I see these test positivity numbers, I'm always left wondering what self-selection factors are causing people to get tested and how that skews the results, for what it's worth:

Quote:

Positive Covid-19 Tests Fall to Lowest Recorded Rate
By Brianna Abbott
June 13, 2021 8:00 am ET

The proportion of Covid-19 laboratory tests that are coming back positive is at the lowest recorded point since the pandemic took hold in the U.S., a sign of progress as the country moves ahead with reopening.

Laboratories processed more than 677,000 laboratory-based Covid-19 tests a day on average during the week ended June 3, down from the peak of more than two million during the fall and winter, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Some 2% of Covid-19 tests are coming back positive, compared with more than 13% during the height of the winter surge, according to Johns Hopkins University, which compiles Covid-19 testing and case data in the U.S.

The percentage of tests that come back positive, known as the test-positivity rate, depends both on the level of disease and the amount of testing being done. The national positivity rate was highest early in the pandemic, when the limited amount of testing available focused on people with symptoms.

The proportion of tests coming back positive has been consistently falling since April this year and is now at the lowest point since March 2020, the furthest back the Johns Hopkins data are available.

The low positivity rate is a signal that the drop in infections is really due to less disease in the country rather than because the U.S. is testing less for the virus, according to epidemiologists. It is another indication of how the U.S. is gaining ground against the Covid-19 pandemic, along with declining case counts, hospitalizations and deaths . . . .

. . . infectious-disease experts said testing remains an important tool for tracking the pandemic and curbing transmission.

People should keep being tested, health experts said, if they have symptoms or are unvaccinated. Nursing homes, prisons and other high-risk settings should probably continue to test people regularly, the experts said, particularly in areas with low vaccination rates or high infection levels.

Some public-health experts expressed concern that people might not seek testing, even with mild symptoms, if they feel the pandemic is over or don’t see it as a threat, which could help spread the virus and complicate the ability of health authorities to keep track of the pandemic . . . .

At least five states had test-positivity rates of 40% or above in early January during the pandemic’s deadliest surge in the country. Now just three states—Idaho, Kansas and Alabama—have rates above 10%, according to Johns Hopkins University.

Health authorities have also used the metric to help suss out whether Covid-19 was spreading or retreating in a community . . . .
https://www.wsj.com/articles/positiv...d=hp_lead_pos5

Pedestrian Jun 13, 2021 7:56 PM

The U. of California and California State University systems are going to require all students and staff to be fully vaccinated once vaccines receive full FDA approval.

I'm hoping this might be incentive for upper division (juniors/seniors) high school students to get vaccinated as well since it takes 5 or 6 weeks from the time you get your first shot until you are considered "fully vaccinated".

Pfizer has already applied for such approval for its vaccine but the process can take 8 months so I am expecting such approval to come in the middle of the 20121-2022 academic year. It would therefore be prudent for students expecting to enter college in the California system and not wanting any disruption in their studies to get fully vaccinated before matriculation.

Also, this probably isn't unusual. I expect quite a few colleges and universities not already requiring vaccination to do the same as California.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.