SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Transportation (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=25)
-   -   New York City - Transit News (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=154524)

k1052 Mar 27, 2019 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardecila (Post 8519858)
Well, among the various carve-out proposals is this:

Free subway transfers for those commuting from 18 Metro-North and Long Island Rail Road stations in the Bronx and Queens


Presumably this would make transit a more realistic option for those living in "transit deserts" beyond the reach of the subway that nonetheless have LIRR or Metro North stops.

I'm thinking it's more the high cost of LIRR and MNRR tickets than the cost of NYCT subway fare for transfers keeping riders off in those areas. Tying some fare equalization for city neighborhoods served by new capacity might be a better idea. LIRR when the ESA/3rd main track opens and MNRR when Penn Access happens.

Crawford Mar 27, 2019 1:43 PM

One of the weirdest lies continually promulgated by the opponents is the "transit desert" narrative. There is no such thing.

There's nowhere in the Five Boroughs where you don't have nearby bus service connecting to rail, or express buses. People who drive have other options and are making a choice, and that choice will no longer be as heavily subsidized.

But the city also needs to institute parking permits. Currently nonresidents occupy a huge share of on-street parking spaces. Congestion pricing + parking permits will make an enormous difference.

mrnyc Mar 27, 2019 2:00 PM

more important than that is the city needs to take out street lanes and widen sidewalks. the steady increase in population of the city along with tourism demand it.

k1052 Mar 27, 2019 3:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 8520109)
One of the weirdest lies continually promulgated by the opponents is the "transit desert" narrative. There is no such thing.

There's nowhere in the Five Boroughs where you don't have nearby bus service connecting to rail, or express buses. People who drive have other options and are making a choice, and that choice will no longer be as heavily subsidized.

But the city also needs to institute parking permits. Currently nonresidents occupy a huge share of on-street parking spaces. Congestion pricing + parking permits will make an enormous difference.

While MNRR or LIRR run through a bunch of hoods it's not necessarily a given that enough people can actually afford to utilize those services at current pricing.

Permit parking and tow absolutely anything not registered in the zone. All hourly parking to a demand model and rates rising with CPI annually. More loading zones...a shit ton more. Impound all sidewalk parkers. Eliminate the entire placard program.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrnyc (Post 8520128)
more important than that is the city needs to take out street lanes and widen sidewalks. the steady increase in population of the city along with tourism demand it.

Do this too. Plus more barrier protected bike lanes. Also expand the Brooklyn bridge pedestrian path immediately.

Crawford Mar 27, 2019 3:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k1052 (Post 8520234)
While MNRR or LIRR run through a bunch of hoods it's not necessarily a given that enough people can actually afford to utilize those services at current pricing.

Agreed, but that can be fixed. Cityticket already offers lower fares and can be expanded. And those areas tend to be affluent, so it isn't like you have lots of poor folks in, say, Douglaston, or Riverdale, without transit options.

And there are always the cheaper options of express buses or the local buses to the closest subway stop. Someone in, say, Mill Basin can take the bus to the end of the nearest train line, or take an express bus directly to Manhattan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by k1052 (Post 8520234)
Permit parking and tow absolutely anything not registered in the zone. All hourly parking to a demand model and rates rising with CPI annually. More loading zones...a shit ton more. Impound all sidewalk parkers. Eliminate the entire placard program.

Agree with all this 100%. Congestion pricing should just be the first step to a rational regional mobility plan.

And, yeah, sidewalks, especially the avenues in Manhattan, desperately need to be widened. Some, like Lex, 3rd, 2nd and 8th are ridiculous relevant to road width and pedestrian demand. They were all shrunk in the 40's and 50's. It's time to take the space back.

k1052 Mar 27, 2019 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 8520288)
And, yeah, sidewalks, especially the avenues in Manhattan, desperately need to be widened. Some, like Lex, 3rd, 2nd and 8th are ridiculous relevant to road width and pedestrian demand. They were all shrunk in the 40's and 50's. It's time to take the space back.

I'd pedestrianize 34th from 6th to 9th, basically all of the financial district, take a lane away from every avenue from 7th to 2nd for more sidewalk, and close the area around/through Rockefeller Center to everything but commercial traffic and make those streets shared with pedestrians. To start.

mrnyc Mar 28, 2019 1:29 PM

the cops are trying to shut down placard reforms


https://www.amny.com/news/placard-abuse-nypd-1.29035668

k1052 Mar 28, 2019 3:00 PM

It's crazy how BDB has enabled that program to explode and also do nothing about the rampant fraud/abuse of people with fakes or by people who are not eligible. it's like he won't be satisfied until cars cover every sidewalk in the city and people have to scramble over top of them.

The waste/rot that he's caused and permitted as mayor wrt transportation is extraordinary. Hopefully somebody who at least appears to give a shit and is willing to reprioritize will take his office when the term is up (Corey Johnson would work). The city could greatly improve the ease of getting around very quickly.

mrnyc Mar 29, 2019 11:07 AM

no surprize, but the new ferry system is heavily subsidized:

https://ny.curbed.com/platform/amp/2...ayor-de-blasio

k1052 Mar 29, 2019 12:25 PM

Deals starting to come into focus.

Quote:

ALBANY — A congestion pricing program for New York City would provide $1 billion for the Long Island Rail Road under an agreement struck Thursday in state budget negotiations, according to an official familiar with the deal.

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo's congestion pricing plan would raise billions of dollars in tolls charged to motorists driving into Manhattan below 60th Street. The aim is to reduce traffic congestion while raising money to fix New York City’s subways and commuter rails.

The Long Island Rail Road would get 10 percent of the revenue, the Metro North commuter rail system would get 10 percent, and NYC Transit, which includes subways and buses, would get 80 percent of revenue, according to the official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the budget deal hadn't yet been announced.
https://www.newsday.com/news/region-...any-1.29094300

Its a bit aggravating since the subsidy the MTA incurs per LIRR/MNRR rider is already waaay higher than NYCT riders. Also the money pit of the East Side Access which just incinerates piles of cash on contact. If this is the deal it could have been worse though.

Hopefully the dynamic pricing stays in so that the end goal can actually be achieved.

Nexis4Jersey Mar 29, 2019 3:56 PM

ᴴᴰ R142 2 Express Train via Bowling Green / Wall St Announcements - To Flatbush Avenue from 241 St

Video Link


One of the most confusing reroutes, here are the automated announcements for a rerouted 2 train running via South Ferry Loop to Wall St via Bowling green and then back down to Brooklyn. Normally the conductor skips the South Ferry and Bowling green stops, but i managed to piece together the full program.

mrnyc Mar 30, 2019 4:07 PM

^ there are some insane weekend reroutes, especially lately with all the troubles the system is having.

we were in queens plaza last weekend around 10pm when a train finally came in and they said, oh btw everybody on this is the last train of the night the station is shutting down. ooh kaaaay. ugh.

that said, there are also plenty of common reroutes that regular riders would know, like 5 trains running on the westside, that confuse the beejezus out of visitors.

mrnyc Apr 1, 2019 11:04 AM

nyc ferry system slants as an amenity for the rich:


https://nypost.com/2019/03/31/city-f...t-new-yorkers/

mrnyc Apr 1, 2019 1:01 PM

details to be worked out but the congestion pricing measure passed late last night.

the big thing is the money goes into a lockbox for mta so cuomo cant dip into it:


The money from the congestion pricing proposal would go into a "lockbox" for MTA capital projects, along with new revenue from an internet sales tax and progressive mansion tax. All three together could be bonded against to raise a total $25 billion in new funding.


more:
https://newyork.cbslocal.com/2019/03...stion-pricing/

https://www.amny.com/transit/mta-con...omo-1.29209432

plutonicpanda Apr 2, 2019 3:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrnyc (Post 8503979)
hay ny

i really don't care, do you? :koko:




Trump budget doesn't include Gateway tunnel funding, U.S. DOT says

The Gateway Program would bring critical repairs to the damaged Hudson River tunnels that serve Amtrak and New Jersey Transit.



By Vincent Barone
Updated March 11, 2019 9:31 PM

https://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/..._768/image.jpg


President Donald Trump continued to spurn the Hudson River’s failing commuter rail tunnels, as elected officials stared down a “doomsday scenario” for the region.

The White House’s proposed 2020 budget does not include any new funding for the stalled Gateway Program, which in part would replace the two 110-year-old, Sandy-damaged Hudson River tunnels — a vital, 2.5-mile link for hundreds of thousands of daily commuters who take the rails between New York and New Jersey.

“Those transit projects are local responsibilities, and elected officials from New York and New Jersey are the ones accountable for them,” said U.S. Department of Transportation Deputy Secretary Jeffrey Rosen on Monday, during a budget briefing call with reporters.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/trump-b...nel-1.28393510

This is very frustrating as is the budget for 2020. I thought we were promised a major infrastructure overhaul... For the 2nd year in a row, we’re told it probably isn’t happening this year. Not to spur a political debate, but it will be interesting President Trump uses infrastructure reform as a platform for re-election.

mrnyc Apr 3, 2019 11:12 AM

sayonara to the metrocard — mta and regional tap payment rollout details:


https://www.amny.com/transit/metroca...mny-1.29297988

Busy Bee Apr 3, 2019 1:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plutonicpanda (Post 8526843)
This is very frustrating as is the budget for 2020. I thought we were promised a major infrastructure overhaul... For the 2nd year in a row, we’re told it probably isn’t happening this year. Not to spur a political debate, but it will be interesting President Trump uses infrastructure reform as a platform for re-election.


You thought that was actually going to happen? Besides, the pub's gave all the money away to the rich and powerful in the tax scam bill. You're placing your hopes for an infrastructure revolution in the wrong hands. You want massive transformative infrastructure investment? Elect Democrats!

M II A II R II K Apr 6, 2019 10:59 PM

Pied-à-terre tax died for ridiculous reasons

https://cityandstateny.com/articles/...s-reasons.html

Quote:

.....

- For all the relief among mass transit riders at having secured congestion pricing as a revenue stream, absent additional measures, repairs to New York City’s ailing subway system will remain underfunded. The measure is expected to bring in $15 billion over 10 years, while the MTA’s Fast Forward Plan for repairs and upgrades will cost an estimated $40 billion over a decade. --- Aware of this shortfall, the state Legislature considered adding a tax to the state budget that would make the world’s most privileged denizens contribute a little bit to a city from which they profit handsomely: a pied-à-terre tax. The levy would have fallen on owners of homes worth $5 million or more in New York City that are not their primary residence and are not rented out to a full-time tenant. It would have been progressive, with gradually rising rates.

- According to a Wall Street Journal analysis, the pied-à-terre tax would have raised $471 million per year, half of which would have come from just 280 homes worth more than $25 million. New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer found the tax would have raised $650 million. --- Under pressure from their generous benefactors in the real estate industry, Democratic legislators and Gov. Andrew Cuomo opted to instead tax a far broader range of actual New Yorkers and come up with less revenue, imposing a “mansion tax” surcharge on anyone buying a home in New York City for over $2 million and raising the real estate transfer tax on homes selling for more than $3 million. This is expected to raise only $365 million per year on average, and it is a much less consistent revenue stream than a tax assessed on a property every year because in years like 2009, when credit froze after the Great Recession, far fewer sales are made.

.....



https://cityandstateny.com/sites/def...980833409d1a14

Busy Bee Apr 6, 2019 11:34 PM

of course

mrnyc Apr 7, 2019 2:17 PM

corrupt nitwits

lets see who got breaks on new homes, apts and office leases for doing that.

chris08876 Apr 8, 2019 9:17 PM

The fight over exemptions will determine the fate of NYC’s congestion pricing

Quote:

With the passage of the state budget and the long-awaited and hard-fought approval of congestion pricing for Manhattan, New Yorkers worn down by endless subway delays and clogged city streets may see some light at the end of the proverbial tunnel. Congestion pricing, after all, has been promised as the silver bullet that will fix the subway and free Manhattan from the endless sea of cars that clog streets, crowding out pedestrians and polluting our air.

Advocates fighting for a traffic pricing plan have promised the world. A fee for cars entering Manhattan will clear the borough of crippling congestion while guaranteeing funding for Andy Byford’s comprehensive Fast Forward plan to fix New York City’s subways and buses. The dollars will unlock billions in capital spending, and limiting traffic will clear up the city’s air at a time when the catastrophic global impact of constant carbon emissions could not be more clear. (Or so the argument goes.)

But passing congestion pricing was just the first battle in a longer war, and for congestion pricing to be a success—for it to solve the problems it is supposed to solve—the next 21 months will be key as the MTA’s new Traffic Mobility Review Board develops the details of the plan, including any exemptions for those who drive into Manhattan but do not have to pay the fee. Congestion pricing will live or die by these carve-outs—and the board must ignore any political drum-beating related to them.

As I wrote in these pages last summer, congestion pricing is a progressive solution for New York City’s transit funding woes. Drivers in the city are wealthier than transit riders, and imposing a fee on them for access to limited road space to fund transit—whose benefits are enjoyed by millions in NYC—is the very definition of a progressive charging plan. But the benefits will take a few years to materialize. Fixing the subways—installing modern signal systems so that more trains can run through 100-year-old tunnels with fewer delays—is a multi-year (or multi-decade) fix, while congestion pricing will become a reality within the next two years. To successfully introduce congestion pricing, the MTA will roll out transit upgrades before the fee goes into effect, including more bus service and bus lanes, but in the near-term, drivers will face a new tax while high-capacity transit upgrades will be years away. And they won’t be happy.

As a rule, popularity for congestion pricing hits a valley in the period between approval and implementation as the narratives focus on fees rather than results. In recent polls, congestion pricing is already under water by 13 percentage points, and politicians may try to drive up approval numbers by kowtowing to groups seeking exemptions. But for New York City to experience the benefits of congestion pricing, politicians will have to provide cover for an initially unpopular plan.

[...]
==================
https://ny.curbed.com/2019/4/8/18299...lan-exemptions

Busy Bee Apr 8, 2019 11:21 PM

What's there to study? The connection was foreseen and accomidated for over 80 years ago! It's probably the most obvious needed subway extention on planet earth:

MTA to study Utica Ave subway extension, again

mrnyc Apr 17, 2019 12:02 PM

saving $$$ on second avenue subway phase two:


https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs...roject-forward

k1052 Apr 17, 2019 6:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris08876 (Post 8533707)
The fight over exemptions will determine the fate of NYC’s congestion pricing


==================
https://ny.curbed.com/2019/4/8/18299...lan-exemptions

The way things look headed there are going there will be so many rebates and carve outs that I'd be shocked if congestion pricing generates half the anticipated revenue or a fraction of the hoped for congestion relief. We are unable to do even the simplest things because we absolutely must provide drivers with massive advantages at all times which can't be allowed to be reduced and let transit riders get the crumbs as usual. There is a colossal lack of political will.

k1052 Apr 24, 2019 7:00 PM

Reports starting to surface that traffic from NJ will be exempt from congestion pricing. Why do it at all since the governor is going to basically exempt all existing traffic by the time this is done and little revenue will be generated?

What a total fuck up.

streetscaper Apr 24, 2019 8:07 PM

^^ from the very beginning they said they would give discounts to NJ tunnels riders commensurate to the amount they currently pay for the tunnels.

I think this is the fair way to go. NJ residents shouldn't have to pay $15 to take the tunnel and then another $12-$14 when they exit the tunnel and into Manhattan


Quote:

About 115,000 people drive from New Jersey into Manhattan below 60th Street every weekday — about 13 percent of the 880,000 people who drive into the congestion zone, according to a 2017 count by the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/n...sultPosition=1

k1052 Apr 24, 2019 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by streetscaper (Post 8551110)
^^ from the very beginning they said they would give discounts to NJ tunnels riders commensurate to the amount they currently pay for the tunnels.

I think this is the fair way to go. NJ residents shouldn't have to pay $15 to take the tunnel and then another $12-$14 when they exit the tunnel and into Manhattan



https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/16/n...sultPosition=1

The MTA chair has now said that he doesn't know what agreement the NJ Gov is referring to and basically that there isn't one.

As long as he Hudson crossing charges float on demand I can live with it I guess. The demand charge should not be capped however.

As far as fairness is NJ not going to toll NYC drivers on their highways?

mrnyc Apr 29, 2019 2:59 PM

L train gateway?


Bury the Gateway plan: The L train method is the proven way to repair the Hudson tubes

By DAILY NEWS EDITORIAL BOARD
| NEW YORK DAILY NEWS |
APR 29, 2019 | 4:05 AM

Amtrak’s $30 billion Gateway boondoggle, centered around repairing the Superstorm Sandy-damaged Hudson tubes by building new ones, died Friday night with the start of the repairs of the L train’s Sandy-damaged East River tubes.

The MTA was planning to close the L tubes for 15 months to rip out and replace the concrete bench walls. Instead, the bench walls will no longer house power and communication cables, those will be affixed to open racks on the sides of the tube, allowing much easier access.

The Gateway gang says that they will look at cable racking, meaning the repairs won’t have to wait a decade for a new tunnel. Not good enough. In February 2018, they submitted an environmental impact statement to the feds for approval. Federal law mandates that all alternatives must be formally evaluated, but although the draft runs 1,787 pages, it never mentions racking, although it does discuss a far-out idea for a new Hudson rail bridge above Manhattan and even a new rail tunnel with bicycle lanes.

The Port Authority, as the sponsor, must withdraw the submission until racking can be rigorously reviewed and made the preferred method. The feds should also reject it for the same reason.


more:
https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/...shu-story.html

M II A II R II K Apr 30, 2019 9:24 PM

Four Lessons for 14th Street From Toronto’s Transit-First King Street

https://nyc.streetsblog.org/2019/04/...t-king-street/

Quote:

.....

- City officials are saying their “busway” plan for 14th Street was inspired by the success of a similar project on Toronto’s King Street. But New York ain’t Canada. In Toronto, city officials (and the city’s then-transit boss Andy Byford) saw the same problem that New York is now confronting: A key east-west artery and transit route was mired in congestion that was causing public transit to crawl and ridership to plummet. — So Toronto went bold, banning cars and trucks from the byway, except for quick deliveries. All delivery vehicles were required to make the next legal turn a solution that clear the congested roadway for transit (in this case a streetcar).

- Where Toronto put dedicated loading zones, taxi stands, and 18 pedestrian plazas along its route, New York will use extra space for lanes with legal 30-minute parking a near-guarantee of double-parking in a city already rife with scofflaw drivers. — And New York’s Department of Transportation will allow trucks to share the roadway with buses, a concession to West Village residents who were concerned that trucks would use more residential roads to get across town. — Select Bus Service and the accompanying transit priority restrictions won’t launch on 14th Street until June or so.

- New York officials caved to organized opposition on Manhattan’s West Side by allowing trucks to share an already limited roadway with buses. Streetsblog asked DOT Commissioner Polly Trottenberg about that on Wednesday, when the plan was first revealed. — “[On] King Street you had a pretty big commercial corridor and then a couple of somewhat large commercial corridors on the adjoining streets,” Trottenberg said. “Here, particularly over in the West Village, there was a lot of concern and we didn’t want to discount it that trucks would go … onto smaller more residential streets.”

- On King Street, for-hire vehicles are only permitted between 10 p.m. and 5 a.m. — and that’s simply too much access even in a city with parallel commercial streets: On Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights, streetcar trip times are actually 30 percent longer — an ominous sign for NYC’s current plan to allow for-hire vehicles at all times. — New York will allow cabs all day and night albeit for dropoffs and pickups only. Not even Trottenberg is certain that can work. “We’ve done a lot of traffic modeling and the good news is, there isn’t a lot of pickup and drop-off activity,” Trottenberg claimed. “We have looked at taxi data and other things.”

.....



https://i2.wp.com/nyc.streetsblog.or...pg?w=800&ssl=1

aaron38 May 1, 2019 2:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris08876 (Post 8533707)
The fight over exemptions will determine the fate of NYC’s congestion pricing
Congestion pricing, after all, has been promised as the silver bullet that will fix the subway and free Manhattan from the endless sea of cars that clog streets, crowding out pedestrians and polluting our air.

Advocates fighting for a traffic pricing plan have promised the world. A fee for cars entering Manhattan will clear the borough of crippling congestion while guaranteeing funding for Andy Byford’s comprehensive Fast Forward plan to fix New York City’s subways and buses. The dollars will unlock billions in capital spending, and limiting traffic will clear up the city’s air

==================
https://ny.curbed.com/2019/4/8/18299...lan-exemptions

It doesn't work that way. Congestion pricing can't raise billions and rid the city of cars at the same time. No more than cigarette taxes can fund healthcare while also ending smoking.
Behavior will quickly fall to one side or the other. Either the city will be full of the cars of the wealthy who continue to drive because they can. The wealthy will probably drive more as their trip times improve. Everyone else is priced out and you get inequality protests.
Or everyone abandons their cars and there's no new revenue.

Nouvellecosse May 1, 2019 4:13 PM

The purpose of congestion pricing isn't to rid the city of cars, it's to rid the city of congestion. There will still be a huge number of vehicles, including cars, moving freely and efficiently through the city.

In other words, limit the number of cars based on the amount that people are willing to pay (determined by the laws of supply and demand) rather than limit the number of cars based on the amount of congestion people are willing to tolerate which is what currently happens in most major cities. In most cities there is a huge amount of latent demand for road space at peak times so it's impractical to expand the road network enough to keep it moving smoothly and as a result everyone using the road (including businesses and people of all income levels) is having their time and money wasted by congestion. In other words, there is already a congestion price because congestion is very expensive. The difference is that congestion pricing is a way to limit road use in a managed way by routing that cost into something productive rather than having it wasted in terms of productive time and fuel being basically evaporated.

pico44 May 4, 2019 12:25 PM

:previous:


Well said. And I don't want to hear about ANY exceptions except for emergency/disability services. I know the cops are already whining but that needs to be shut down immediately

chris08876 May 12, 2019 1:52 PM

2nd span u/c. Kosciuszko Bridge replacement.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...8070135e_k.jpg
Governor Cuomo Announces Second Span of New Kosciuszko Bridge to Open in September 2019 - Four Years Ahead of Schedule and On Budget by governorandrewcuomo, on Flickr

mrnyc May 13, 2019 4:12 PM

customers can start to use omny, the new mta tap card system, at a handful of stations starting the end of this month.

omny will eventually replace the metrocard:




TRANSIT

How to use OMNY, the MetroCard replacement coming to some subway lines, buses
The MTA's new tap-to-pay system will launch on May 31 at 16 subway stations and on Staten Island buses.

By Lauren Cook

Updated May 10, 2019 8:23 AM


https://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/..._768/image.jpg



Spring is a time for new beginnings, and for the MTA that means rolling out a new way to enter the subway.

On May 31, the MTA will launch OMNY, its new tap-to-pay system that will eventually replace the swipe, swipe, swipe of the MetroCard.

In an attempt to control the chaos likely to occur if the MetroCard was tossed out overnight, the MTA is rolling out the new system in phases, starting with 16 subway stations on the 4, 5 and 6 lines in Manhattan and Brooklyn. The new technology will also be available on Staten Island buses at the same time.



more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/how-doe...ork-1.30857529

mrnyc May 13, 2019 4:18 PM

some good news --- as advertized, the ato/cbtc system upgrades are improving service on the L and 7 trains:


TRANSIT

MTA completes 7 line's Automatic Train Operation upgrade in Queens

The 7 in Queens is the second line to be upgraded with ATO, after the L train. All other lines rely on operators to control a train's acceleration, cruising speed and braking.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/subway-...ain-1.30860424

M II A II R II K May 13, 2019 7:25 PM

Video Link

Dale May 17, 2019 7:54 PM

Is any tangible progress being made on Fast Forward ?

k1052 May 17, 2019 8:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale (Post 8576756)
Is any tangible progress being made on Fast Forward ?

From what I've read, yes. On time statistics have improved due to repairs (especially signaling), removal of old speed restrictions, and elimination/updates to signal timers. The cutover to CBTC on the 7 has dramatically improved on time performance even though there are some teething issues with automatic operation. They still have a long way to go and rush period dispatching appears to be a continuing problem.

Dale May 17, 2019 8:19 PM

Thanks for the update! Also, are the new cars still on pace ?

https://www.amny.com/transit/new-subway-cars-1.26287915

k1052 May 17, 2019 8:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dale (Post 8576794)
Thanks for the update! Also, are the new cars still on pace ?

https://www.amny.com/transit/new-subway-cars-1.26287915

As far as I know however given how these procurements go I would expect a delay of some sort once they start getting them and testing. I think there were fewer problems with the Kawasaki cars (where the next order is coming from) than the problematic Bombardier R179s so hopefully it's mostly on schedule.

Dale May 17, 2019 8:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by k1052 (Post 8576813)
As far as I know however given how these procurements go I would expect a delay of some sort once they start getting them and testing. I think there were fewer problems with the Kawasaki cars (where the next order is coming from) than the problematic Bombardier R179s so hopefully it's mostly on schedule.

Sweet!

mrnyc May 20, 2019 11:38 PM

L train work on track at the start:


https://www.amny.com/transit/l-train...ion-1.31362759

chris08876 May 26, 2019 12:12 AM

Video Link


Quote:

New York will become the first U.S. city to impose congestion pricing, seen as a key weapon against global warming, following lawmakers' approval of a state budget to fund the plan.

M II A II R II K Jun 7, 2019 7:27 PM

Uber Copter Will Only Make New York Transit Worse

https://www.citylab.com/transportati...copter/591235/

Quote:

.....

- The JFK-Manhattan connection is one of New York’s great transit flaws, a major city is unable to offer a one-seat ride from its airport to its central business district. That’s why many New Yorkers and tourists rely on cars rather than trains to get to JFK, making traffic worse and triggering a vicious cycle of mobility frustration. — Starting July 9, Uber users can take to the skies to get to the airport, with the ride-hailing giant introducing a weekday helicopter service between Lower Manhattan and JFK. With a paid Uber to the helipad, the trip, the company says, could take as little as 30 minutes (the helicopter part is just eight minutes of that).

- Except, naturally, Uber Copter isn’t for most people, and in fact, caters to a very specific group of people. The average price will range from $200 to $225, and is only available to Platinum or Diamond Uber Rewards users. In other words: You have to spend between $1,250 and $3,750 on UberX rides in a six-month period to be able to take a $200 helicopter near Wall Street to what is presumably your private jet or first-class commercial seat. — The vehicles that will take to the skies of New York are not the sleek electric sky-taxis seen in the company’s CGI promotional film. Those do not exist. Instead, they’re conventional twin-engined gas-fueled choppers, the type that emit more CO2 emissions than cars.

- Yet the true tragedy of Uber Copter is that it overshadows concrete alternatives that transit planners have put forward for years to make the Midtown-to-JFK connection faster and cheaper for a much greater strata of riders. Take the Rockaway Beach Line, for example. Per a 2017 proposal by the Regional Plan Association (one of the five ideas it released at the time), this defunct commuter rail route could be reactivated, allowing the LIRR to go directly from Penn Station (and, soon, Grand Central) to JFK, bypassing the AirTrain. — It’s a big lift: The price tag for this project varies in the upper millions, and would require building two train terminals in the central airport area. But it would dramatically improve JFK access for an estimated 10,000 passengers per day

.....



https://images.fastcompany.net/image...rs-for-now.jpg

Busy Bee Jun 9, 2019 2:14 AM

^ Great way to die.

urbanflight Jun 10, 2019 5:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by M II A II R II K (Post 8598775)
Uber Copter Will Only Make New York Transit Worse

The vehicles that will take to the skies of New York are not the sleek electric sky-taxis seen in the company’s CGI promotional film. Those do not exist. Instead, they’re conventional twin-engined gas-fueled choppers, the type that emit more CO2 emissions than cars.

This is so disgusting.

Honestly society is sick, people will never realize the horrible consequences of all the destruction that is being caused to the environment?

mrnyc Jun 11, 2019 10:20 AM

july 1st start for 14st busway.

no cars from 6am-10pm

3rd av to 9av

also bus sbs service starts

many stops eliminated to speed things up.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/14th-street-bus-1.32231282

M II A II R II K Jun 11, 2019 3:50 PM

I take it that copter thing is off then.

Busy Bee Jun 11, 2019 6:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by urbanflight (Post 8600437)
This is so disgusting.

Honestly society is sick, people will never realize the horrible consequences of all the destruction that is being caused to the environment?

I was thinking about writing a long meandering opinion, but I'm afraid the short answer is no. Or more specifically the short answer is no if it's making someone gobs of money or if many people are dependent on the status quo making them moderate amounts of money. Rocking the boat can be scary if people haven't planned for what they might hop into when it tips over.

mrnyc Jun 20, 2019 5:30 PM

lga airtrain complaints from the compTROLLer :D


MTA isn't ready for LaGuardia AirTrain ridership, comptroller says


By Vincent Barone

Updated June 19, 2019 7:01 PM


The MTA isn’t ready to handle additional riders expected to take the LaGuardia AirTrain coming in 2022, according to City Comptroller Scott Stringer.

Citing infrequent Long Island Rail Road service to the new airport link and shrinking funds for critical station upgrades, Stringer penned a letter to the Port Authority and MTA dated Monday June, 17, asking for more rail service to handle larger crowds.


more:
https://www.amny.com/transit/laguard...ain-1.32624886


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.