This Tiny Boston Tunnel Is the Missing Piece to Finally Connect the Entire East Coast
https://www.thrillist.com/travel/nat...outh-rail-link Quote:
https://i.imgur.com/PHIx8yN.jpg?1 |
With An Eye Toward Lower Emissions, Clean Air Travel Gets Off The Ground
With An Eye Toward Lower Emissions, Clean Air Travel Gets Off The Ground
July 29, 2019 By Ari Shapiro NPR https://media.npr.org/assets/img/201...-s1600-c85.jpg A Pipistrel Taurus Electro electric two-seat airplane flies above Ajdovscina, Slovenia. (Photo via NPR) "Electric cars are all over the roads these days. But what about electric planes? Air travel currently accounts for only about 2% of global carbon emissions. But it's expected to grow in the next century, and clean air travel is seen as a key part of slowing global warming. "We're expecting to see massive growth," says Umair Irfan, who writes about climate change, energy and the environment for Vox. "The International Civil Aviation Organization projects upward of 700 percent growth by the middle of the century. So while it is small, it is going to be a larger and larger share..." https://www.npr.org/2019/07/29/74627...off-the-ground |
Quote:
“The original Big Dig plan also included the North-South Rail Link, which would have connected North and South Stations (the major passenger train stations in Boston), but this aspect of the project was ultimately dropped by the state transportation administration early in the Dukakis administration. Negotiations with the federal government had led to an agreement to widen some of the lanes in the new harbor tunnel, and accommodating these would require the tunnel to be deeper and mechanically-vented; this left no room for the rail lines, and having diesel trains (then in use) passing through the tunnel would have substantially increased the cost of the ventilation system.” In other words, it is practically impossible to dig a new rail tunnel between North and South Stations in Boston. And I would like to add, if it could be built, why do so? All Amtrak trains from the south use electric locomotives, all Amtrak trains from the north and west use diesel locomotives. Do you really think Amtrak will have the ability to switch all through trains locomotives at the platforms in either North or South Stations? So why even consider building it? It would only make sense if every through train is powered with electric locomotives. Before even planning building this new tunnel, shouldn’t we start planing and building catenaries on the rail lines north of North Station and start buying new electric locomotives to run using them? These new electric locomotives could be used on the new electrified lines whether the new tunnels were built or not, the new tunnels couldn’t be used by diesel locomotives without spending additional millions of dollars on a larger ventilation systems. |
Building that N-S tunnel in Boston to run Amtrak through it makes little sense to me. The cities north of Boston are too small to make any real difference to passenger numbers for intercity trains.
Building it to turn the commuter rail into a through-running RER-like system makes perfect sense (including full electrification). Which I know has been proposed a few times already. Do that, and then have a few Amtrack trains run through it? sure, makes sense as well. |
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Quote:
I question how many jobs / other destinations are within walking distance of MBTA stations outside of the Urban core. I also think that Greater Boston does not have a large enough population to maintain the train frequencies needed for a through-system where people will have to transfer. I think I made enemies on the other thread, so I will end my post here haha. |
To me (having never been), the main holes in the Boston transportation system are:
1) No subway service to Codman Square 2) No subway service to Everett, Medford, or Lynn 3) Poor level of service on some commuter rail lines 4) Lack of a one-seat ride between North Station and South Station I would put those three before a North - South rail link. Again, please correct me if I am wrong. |
Quote:
Greater Boston does have the needed population. Several smaller European cities have such services since decades and it is something that generates more density around stations (if allowed to). Other priorities? Sure. Extending the Blue line etc. A comprehensive long term plan is needed so the money is invested sensibly (few cities manage this). |
|
|
Wabtec - the largest locomotive manufacturer of freight locomotives, is developing a battery-electric locomotive that will immediately transform any diesel-electric consist into a prius-like hybrid:
|
|
Quote:
How much carbon would it take to produce one compared with a diesel-electric locomotive? |
|
|
Every bus in this country deserves its own lane
Free the buses! By Alissa Walker @awalkerinLA Oct 14, 2019 https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/arqt...Portland.0.jpg Earlier this month, New York City did something remarkable. The city transformed one of its busiest crosstown routes into a bus-only street and, by all accounts, the world did not end. It’s being called a miracle, but really, it required no divine intervention: Faced with crushing congestion on 14th Street, the city simply separated its buses from other vehicular traffic. The M14 bus now runs at twice the speed of the M42 bus, which travels a similar distance along Midtown Manhattan’s 42nd Street; it’s so fast that riders are missing their stops. The street is quieter, calmer, and safer, with no adverse affects on other nearby streets. Improved service that exceeds all expectations? This is everything that public transit in this county must aspire to if we want to reduce emissions, congestion, and traffic deaths. What can deliver all this and more? Dedicated bus lanes. ... https://www.curbed.com/2019/10/14/20...7DPWd42SPlqrKk |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.