Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
http://www.realclear.com/arts/2014/0..._art_5936.html
Shetland Islands http://i.imgur.com/L4TVXiw.jpg Ventura, Cali. http://i.imgur.com/O2Em6U0.jpg Athens, Ga. http://i.imgur.com/Q5UoQlR.jpg Minneapolis http://i.imgur.com/HazpNxn.jpg Japan http://i.imgur.com/lCL0Wd1.jpg |
Toronto proposes prefabricated solution to repair Gardiner much faster
Read More: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2014...ch_faster.html Quote:
http://www.thestar.com/content/dam/t...inerwest4c.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
could also use wireless charging systems on these sections:
Quote:
http://www.architeria.com/wp-content...rchitect-3.jpg http://www.architeria.com/architectu...ham-architect/ Quote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/gre...e-changer.html |
Quote:
|
How Buenos Aires unclogged its most iconic street
Read More: http://www.citiscope.org/story/2014/...-iconic-street Quote:
Before http://www.citiscope.org/sites/defau...D9Yvbp43F3.jpg http://www.citiscope.org/sites/defau...PrcdWP7aCM.jpg Buses were re-routed from side streets to the new bus lanes, allowing 100 blocks to become pedestrianized. http://www.citiscope.org/sites/defau...5qcjzBV72z.jpg http://www.citiscope.org/sites/defau...ZjfI2kDybJ.jpg |
Quote:
Quote:
|
That solar panelled freeway could actually make sense if it is economical and especially in colder climates.
As long as the sun is there and it produces enough electrical power to make it economically viable, it would be very popular in areas that get a lot of snow. Not only would it be much safer but it would also safe the state/province a small fortune in snow removal which can become very costly not only to clear but it also deteriorates the roads faster. It would help productivity by getting rid of closed highways due to snow storms etc and make delivery more predictable in the winter. In fact, the more snow an area gets the more it would make sense as the greater the savings in snow removal. Snow removal and sanding/salting is damn expensive and the money saved could go back to the developer of the system. The state/province would get more secure power, safer roads that would require less maintenance and it wouldn't cost them anything extra. |
Quote:
|
http://dinopoloclub.com/minimetro/
New game "Mini Metro" lets you design your own subway system. Train speeds and commuter behavior are automated, so your task is simple: draw the routes that'll get the trains to run as efficiently as possible. You start with a small city of three unconnected stations. But as new neighborhoods pop up and the population swells, you must grow the system accordingly before everything grinds to a halt. http://cdn.theatlanticcities.com/img...ni%20metro.gif Walmart Designed a Fuel-Efficient Truck That Actually Looks Pretty Cool Read More: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/des...tty-cool/8570/ Quote:
|
I can already hear the average American trucker dissing this for looking silly and all Europy etc.
|
Quote:
http://cleantechnica.com/2014/03/07/...e-another-day/ |
Not really anything pertaining to new technology, but supposedly the managers of the Chester County G.O. Carlson Airport near Coatesville want to expand it so that someday the airport can handle commercial jets.
My wife and I just purchased a townhouse that is just across Business Route 30 from the airport... |
|
Absurd?!? Try awesome. The south shore line street running is a blast from the past and I'd hate to see it go.
|
Not as bad as it looks.
Quote:
2) The train Station certainly does not cost much to operate. 3) No one argues with a 9 car train. People wait for this train to cross the street. ************** I do believe, however, that with all the safety legislation and other types of government involvement, that we here in NA have lost the ability to make rail systems cheaply. One reads on various transportation centric websites about why US and, to a lesser extent, Canadian transit system tend to cost so much to make per km. If this station and rail line were built today, additional costs would include: A) Relocating and improving fresh and brown water lines that cross the rail line right-of-way. B) Burying all power lines within 1 or 2 blocks of the rail line, if any power lines were to cross the right of way. C) Digging an underpass, or putting in an overpass at the stop light intersection. D) Putting in wide sidewalks, fencing off the rail line track, and, purchasing a strip (at a high price) of land paralleling the train line for a bike lane. E) Making a stop that would provide no step access for the physically challenged to a full train long platform. F) The platform needs to have a weather shelter that is sufficient for future user needs. G) The station needs some art, preferably large and colorful. H) Local politicians and their property developer friends see the potential of the location, and, have purchased parallel properties during the time the idea of putting the rail line in was discussed. I) The houses on these properties, being blighted, are placed in a tax exemption status for 5 years, then torn town to put in a transportation Oriented Development. J) This TOD requires that a parking lot be put in on one side of the line as the there is parking space to square foot retail + residential ordinance requirement. In the old days they would put in a cheap mile of line in a week or two, and, over the next 3 or 4 years improve portions of the new line during weekends. The station would be a "shack" that would be put up in a couple of days, particularly if preassembled and shipped to the site on the new railroad. I think we have lost something "in translation." Back when railroads were powerful and government was weak, train versus car/bike/pedestrian accidents would be reduced by a combination of continuous horn blasts and running expresses down the street (after the line has been improved) at 100 km/h! |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.