Quote:
Sure, good luck having the unions agree to this, but then go ahead and terminate them all and don't rehire them. The unions know where this is going - their pensions are inevitably going to fail. You'd think they'd want to negotiate something new that locks something achievable in. Illinois is an employment-at-will state. You can legally get fired for looking at your boss sideways. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It is the Illinois Constitution of 1970 that precludes any changes. Even Gov. Quinn's modest pension reform law was struck down in 2015 by the IL Supreme Court. Pension Protection Clause.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There are numerous projects going on or about to happen in and around Chinatown by Chinese developers and while it's not million dollar housing, it's not cheap. These range from that retail plaza being built in Chinatown with room for 40+ restaurants to that warehouse nearby being converted to a 200 room hotel with upscale spa, home furniture store, handful of restaurants...to 30+ new SFH being built on industrial land in Bridgeport to multiple mixed use about to be built Look at the new multi unit buildings on Halsted right south of i55. Almost instantly full of Chinese businesses. Chinese people in average are very pro development and many of the younger people love also non Chinese things. They don't want to see their culture go away..they are HUGE on culture, but in my view they seem to work smarter when building new things and needing retail/commercial space to be filled up right away. Here's the thing..to many from China, their view of wanting space is not the same as some other people. My finances parents live in the very edge of Shanghai. They love nature, hiking, etc but they also want to live near things. They still live in a 8 story residential building and there are numerous 30 story towers around. The only difference is that they have zen gardens out their front door and the then that is good enough. 5 minute walk and they have streets with 100 restaurants away. 10 minute drive away and they are in the country where almost nobody lives and nature, but they don't need a sfh or anything. When we took them to Bridgeport, they thought it was the suburbs. When the 78 comes, you bet your ass they will build more. I guarantee it. It's $$ and they aren't dumb enough to be so insular and not open even more business and probably understand that they're the ones who can build new buildings to house people who work at the 78. That one company in town is already doing it in the area by building tons of new retail and many new residential buildings. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, that one company in Chicago has a big minority share holder from Flushing who is developing tons of stuff there right now. So..you know. I can't see that they'll just disregard the 78. This is $$$ .. They are not going to complain like people in other neighborhoods. They will be the ones building stuff. I guarantee this will happen as long as the 78 happens and gets people working there. |
Quote:
I’m disappointed that 78 station change was deferred, but hopefully Related knows what it’s doing here and is very confident that the new alderman will come aboard.....frankly if it meant some more affordable housing that would be fine with me. Mainly I want to see the 78 move forward as quickly as possible (which will still take a long time) because it is such a well-planned project, including a very smart use of TIF (in sharp contrast to Lincoln Yards, which is a mess of a plan, and should probably not be moving forward in its current form....that’s the project that should have been deferred at its last hearings) |
Quote:
If they reach a deal, Sigcho can tell his constituents in Pilsen that he brought a large-scale 100% affordable housing development to the neighborhood, developed a long-vacant eyesore site, and kept the luxury housing on the other side of the river "where it belongs" lol. |
I recently heard that CTA hadn't actually said they'd accept a curved and inclined platform for the CTA station, so now that the aldermanic election is over we might see an amendment to the TIF on that as well.
|
^ What do you mean? An amendment to return the station to the original flat/straight Dearborn Park location (which Dowell flatly rejected) or an amendment to eliminate the station?
|
No further knowledge at this point. CTA might very well accept the curved location; it's just that saying back in February that they already had was apparently stretching things a bit. But I wouldn't be shocked to see the platform location shifted back to be, at least partly, east of Clark.
|
Wasn’t the main issue just where the station entrance is on the surface?
The platforms itself can be either side. |
The 3rd Ward (Dearborn Park II) residents primarily objected to the closing of Cotton Tail Park for construction of the platforms. They're so near the surface that they'll have to be built cut-and-cover, and Related did themselves no favors by being unwilling to predict how long the park would be closed. Apparently some loud voices just didn't think the park would ever reopen.
Others objected to the entrance location, and the crime they believed that would bring to their doorstep. Looking at the conditions under the Roosevelt L station, you can sort of understand their concerns. Related says there are various utilities stacked up under Clark that make it impossible for the platforms, or walkways, to cross under it. But of course the subway tube itself crosses under Clark somewhere around -20, and I don't know why side platforms can't go right alongside. |
Quote:
But, that proposed station is a very different animal. It should mainly serve DBII, who should be happy to have a station, not angry, and the 78. Those folks will just exit and walk to the development - maybe a few will go to Mariano's first. Different situation entirely. As to the previous Cotton Tail park - how long was Millennial park closed? |
Quote:
|
I don't think it's South Siders that the villagers worry about. It's the scary guys transferring to the Roosevelt bus, and the panhandlers who know Columbia students are easy marks, and the mental cases who've been thrown out of Pacific Garden Mission for the day. Yes, 15th & Clark should be a very different situation, but nuanced views don't make much headway with angered villagers.
It doesn't matter how long Grant Park was closed for creation of "Millennial Park." The moms of the village say "my children are young now." That a subway station might be welcomed when their 5-year-old is a 15-year-old wanting to attend Northside Prep, or go to a Mag Mile job, or visit friends on the North Side . . . again, that's too abstract a concept. They're mad now, and the alderman naturally feels the need to represent that opinion. And Related has done a terrible job of getting out ahead of this, and doing real community outreach instead of passing out ballcaps and showing patronizing videos touting their subcontractor MBE percentages. |
Quote:
. . . |
Saw this while waiting for the train this morning. Hard to tell where it is but it looks like it might be between Clark and the River?
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/dI...=w1151-h863-no |
All times are GMT. The time now is 5:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.