^It looks like shit, cheap.
And Philly is doing just fine. |
I like the lowrise office building, the aparement building is fine, and the hotel looks like it will be a hotel. That highrise... that highrise is a monsterous monument to George Norcross's ego.
|
Quote:
|
Looks like something built in Tulsa in 1986.
|
Any idea how this thing is doing with leasing? I know financing was a big issue about a year ago because they didn't have enough companies signed to move in. It's not attractive, I don't want to go so far as to say it's ugly....it's too boring to call ugly - BUT, it gets a huge pass from me because it's Camden, and they need this.
|
Quote:
|
Scanning PhillybyDrone's latest on Flicker, I notice that there is something under construction on the north side of this developement.
Somehow I doubt it will be any of the sexy renderings, but this was suppoed to be the site of the other tower. Any one know what this is? BTW, best to click through and bring up the full highrez "original". [IMG]https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...82372a13_b.jpg DJI_0917-HDR.jpg by Philly By Drone, on Flickr[/IMG] |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, this highrise is officially COMPLETE:cheers:
We'll close out this thread, and create a new thread when the next highrise starts to be proposed and planned officially. All of the lowrise/midrise projects can be tracked in the Philadelphia/Camden metro thread here: https://forum.skyscraperpage.com/sho...72398&page=176 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.