Air conditioning raising controversy
I'm not aware of the tech to design air conditioners.
All I know is the market is booming here in France, for personal use, because heatwaves occur more often than ever during the summer. So far, air conditioning was mostly in use in office buildings, data centers and places of that kind over here. It's been unavoidable for long to maintain the productivity of employees, to make sure expensive servers/computers don't literally burn out and so on when it's really hot. But now, old people in particular must rely on it in their homes too, to simply not die from heat. I think that's an acceptable and even necessary solution for elderly people, being skeptical otherwise. Here is some reason why. Quote:
https://www.independent.co.uk/enviro...-a8428936.html I also hear air conditioners just work pretty much like refrigerators and freezers. To cool the inside, they obviously release heat on the outside. So it actually appears to be some very poor (and cheap, by the way) solution, not sustainable. Experts say the only reliable thing to do today is to design buildings and cities differently. For example, large windows with no brise soleil (from French, "sun breaker") would not be recommended. It is also necessary to grow many more green spaces within cities, to let them breathe, and to design urban density more like they used to in old Mediterranean towns where heatwaves are nothing much new. You'll notice there's no large windows to old Mediterranean homes, in their ancient villages. It's often a little dark, but you still can breathe without air conditioning in there, even when temperatures hit 90°F or more. On the other hand, urban sprawl remains far too greedy. So building cities in a dense fashion is the right thing to do. And that's where skyscrapers can be really useful. Your thoughts, if any. This could certainly be an interesting discussion. |
In places like the eastern US there is also really high humidity and dew points in the summer which ACs play a critical role reducing indoors. Unfortunately they may be a necessary evil. I think the goal should be make them more efficient / cleaner rather reducing their prevalence.
|
While air conditioning is certainly nice, I don't understand why people set the temperatures so low. It doesn't need to be fucking freezing to be comfortable.
|
Don't touch my AC, bro!
Really though, try living in Austin or pretty much anywhere in the South without it. If the government cares so much they should give us cleaner alternatives, which is happening quite quick in the US, as I believe we had the biggest decrease in emissions in 2017. |
The compromise is using AC but not cooling the inside to a ridiculous level. I was just in Chicago and when it was maybe 28C and humid they cool bars to like, 17C. That's ridiculous - it could be 22 or 23 and still feel fine. New Orleans was even worse - 37C outside and they manage to cool bars with open windows! Energy costs in Ontario are just too much to do that.
I've heard Hong Kong takes this to an even worse level. The density of air conditioning has raised the already oppressive temperatures. |
Quote:
I agree, it's really silly. I also believe the tech behind A/C can grow better, more efficient, just as any tech. However, it would be wrong to rely on it exclusively. I'm sure here in Europe, it won't be necessary in any kind of situations. It might also depend on individuals. Some of us don't suffer so much from heat, and humidity rates are not so bad over here. However, again, I find it great to reassure elderly people. So they know they will wake up the next morning when they go to bed at night. It's been scary to lose many of them just because of a few days of heatwave. Remember we're all likely to grow badly old someday. So taking care of our elders is taking care of ourselves, somehow. |
I think that this is a fascinating and very important topic because as the earth gets hotter we will use more AC and then that makes it hotter so then we need more AC, viscous cycle.
Quote:
Quote:
We have always had to deal with brutal heat and humidity in the summer in my part of the country but this is something else, and the heat waves last for so long now too. When I was a kid you would get a few days and then it would break, now it can last for a week+. Also, seeing 90F+ over and over then was a big deal and now it is very common and heat indexes well into the 100s is regular. |
Quote:
All air conditioners do--and refrigerators too for that matter--is pump heat from one place to another. In the case of refirgerators, they pump it from inside an insulated box to outside. In the case of air conditioners, they pump it from inside a room or a building to outside. This doesn' create heat, just move it around and you can say it increases the heat outside but I believe, other than possibly in the most dense urban environments, the additional heat burden outside is minimal. The second way it "pollutes" is because doing what they do, air conditioners and refrigerators use electricity and generation of that electricity can pollute although not necessarily if done by solar, wind, hydro, geothermal or nuclear methods. Finally, the third way it pollutes is because the chemical that used to be used to absorb heat on one side (the evaporator coil) and release it on the other (the compressor) was Freon, a halocarbon that could deplete then ozone layer of the atmosphere. In the US, and I assume in Europe, this has now been replaced, by law, by less damaging chemicals. As far as home and building design, we are already doing very well at that, at least where it matters most. In the US desert Southwest, where temperatures can reach 125F/52C, people aren't going to comfortable in any building that isn't artifically cooled no matter how well designed. The goal is to build them so as to minimize the burden on the air condtioning by insulating them well and by minimizing the absorbtion of heat into the living spaces. These things are done by thick or well-insulated walls, windows that are impenetrable to heat energy (it is possible now to make triple pane windows that keep heat out as well as the solid walls of those old Mediterranean houses), and reflective wall and roof coatings. The roof of my Arizona house reflects over 98% of solar energy that hits it. You can quickly get a bad sunburn from light reflected from it even if you have no direct sun exposure. There is one other way to cool inside environments but it only works in the desert. These are known as evaporative coolers or, colloquially, "swamp coolers". They are just basically big fans that sit on the roof and blow air through a bunch of material that's kept wet with water and then into the house or building. They cool the air as the water evaporates and they can be quite effective but only where the humidity is very, very low. https://bloximages.chicago2.vip.town...b92a.image.jpg http://www.kafbnucleus.com/news/educ...7d517989a.html These use a lot less electricity than refrigerated air conditioners and so are a lot less expensive to operate. |
Quote:
|
You can take my AC from my cold, dead hands. Which are gonna be real cold because I am going to have it running.
I would think demand for electricity for air conditioning correlates closely with solar energy generation capacity. Both in terms of times of day, seasons of the year, and regions which use it the most. Rooftop installations in homes could assist, having ductless AC and solar panels almost sounds like a combo deal worth marketing in developing countries where people are starting to attain a middle class lifestyle. |
Quote:
http://webnash.com/files/straw%20bale%201.jpg https://i.pinimg.com/originals/26/af...12fe3c104b.jpg https://www.google.com/search?q=hay+...ih=836#imgrc=_ It turns out bales of hay or straw are very insulating and building homes of them, 3 little pigs aside, is becoming more popular. |
Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
I'm not a fan of the heat so AC is the way. On the other hand, cold is nice. Quote:
Or just program central air to turn on an hour before you come from work. No need to have it on all day if the house or unit is empty. |
Quote:
Lol, you know, I'm her youngest son, and she still sees me as her little baby. You see?... It's okay, I can deal with it. She's a cool mom, basically. Then she still likes hot spots like you guys do, huh. But she's not old enough yet. Of course, I was talking about 80+ years old people, not about you. Some of these still want to live too. I'll tell you what, I'm naive enough to believe in the Genesis. Not like those shitheads and bigots who claim the world was created 6000 years ago for whatever stupid reason. You know, those same retards who think gambling and casinos are ok, like they could make a living out of that retarded and backward crap. Those same people who weren't educated enough to do the math / probability, sadly... But it says people could live up to 900+ years, until they get really really tired of this shitty world. And I think that's actually possible, thanks to today's rising techs, such as nanotechnologies. We can do anything for real... I know it's nuts, but nothing is impossible in my experience, in what I have witnessed so far. |
Quote:
In NYC, they now aggressively ticket stores that prop open their doors during the summer while blasting the a/c under a law that was passed a couple of years ago. A lot of bars, restaurants, and clothing retailers would leave the doors open with a/cs on full blast to lure in tourists. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Generally it stays in the 70s inside until the outside temp gets well into the 90s, but I still need A/C when the temp hits 105F, as it commonly does in Tucson and mainly at night because the masonry holds the heat in and radiates it and I like it cool for sleeping. Solid masonry construction, as in the Greek Isles, acts like a big heat sink, stabilizing the temperature more than cooling it. It moderates inside temps in both directions--warmer at night, cooler in the daytime. In the desert we can have 40F day/night temp swings because of the dry air (humidity reduces such variations) so the effect of the masonry walls makes a big difference. |
Quote:
Now, yes, if you're currently addicted to A/C then try quitting it cold turkey in the middle of a heat wave, you're probably going to find it difficult. It's easier if you just don't have it as spring and summer progressively arrive. |
Quote:
You're correct that it's a vicious cycle, though. If nearly everyone in a given warm city has A/C, it's contributing to making the places that don't (outdoors, and a few unlucky people's homes) hotter than they'd otherwise be if everyone decided to simply endure the heat. |
Florida would not be the 3rd. most populous state in the US if it weren't for A/C.
It's a necessity to live comfortably and in the summer my electric bill runs between $300-$400 USD a month. |
I have some coworkers who don't have AC... they tend to spend long days at the office on hot days though!
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 9:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.