SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   CHICAGO | NEMA Chicago | 896 FT | 81 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=218570)

NYC2CHI Dec 1, 2015 5:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by r18tdi (Post 7253461)
They will probably settle on a more pretentious/trendy name.
My money is on "The Grant."

Can't be done. That's what Related's building at 1201 S. Prairie has been called since 2013 (the former One Museum Park West). 113 E. Roosevelt will be directly across Indiana from that one.

ardecila Dec 1, 2015 7:37 AM

I want to say how much I love that ground-level rendering... It's like the bad old days of the 70s along LSD, before developers felt they had to slather everything in cornices and finials! Everything is so rectilinear...

r18tdi Dec 1, 2015 8:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYC2CHI (Post 7253531)
Can't be done. That's what Related's building at 1201 S. Prairie has been called since 2013 (the former One Museum Park West). 113 E. Roosevelt will be directly across Indiana from that one.

Yes of course. Duh. :doh:

rlw777 Dec 1, 2015 8:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chicago Shawn (Post 7251354)
Working name for the project is Grant Park Tower. Also, it was mentioned at plan commission that financing is in place to start early next year. The contractor is McHugh, who is working to provide subcontract jobs to local minority owned firms.

I totally missed that this already had financing. That's Huge sounds like this one is a done deal barring another recession.

Chi-Sky21 Dec 1, 2015 9:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ardecila (Post 7253602)
I want to say how much I love that ground-level rendering... It's like the bad old days of the 70s along LSD, before developers felt they had to slather everything in cornices and finials! Everything is so rectilinear...

It looks ok while it is just 1 tower, but am I the only person who thinks when both are built, the bases together are going to be (for lack of better wording) overwhelming? It is basicly 1 massive podium.

rlw777 Dec 1, 2015 9:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chi-Sky21 (Post 7254325)
It looks ok while it is just 1 tower, but am I the only person who thinks when both are built, the bases together are going to be (for lack of better wording) overwhelming? It is basicly 1 massive podium.

No worries the second tower will almost certainly be redesigned.

skybuilder Dec 5, 2015 5:59 PM

Wow, sometimes when I look at renders and pre production drawings and then compare them with the finished product, I feel the drawing was misleading. But, with this one I feel the statement it'll make on the outline of the park will be inline with the drawings/rendering. This will be a statement building! Something I show my friends when they visit Chicago. Very excited if this comes to fruition!

Skyguy_7 Dec 30, 2015 4:07 PM

Just thought I'd share some elevations, dated 10/21. Looks like the "crown" is gone and replaced by actual floor space. Height still reads 887'-2"

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5703/...ca661bc0_c.jpg

Steely Dan Dec 30, 2015 4:20 PM

^ good to see the height remained unchanged.

HomrQT Dec 30, 2015 7:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 (Post 7283773)
Just thought I'd share some elevations, dated 10/21. Looks like the "crown" is gone and replaced by actual floor space. Height still reads 887'-2"

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5703/...ca661bc0_c.jpg

Was the crown originally meant to be a rooftop deck to anyone's knowledge? If it was simply for decoration I prefer the update with floor space. I didn't like the appearance of the crown much anyway.

skyscraper Dec 30, 2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 (Post 7283773)
Just thought I'd share some elevations, dated 10/21. Looks like the "crown" is gone and replaced by actual floor space. Height still reads 887'-2"

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5703/...ca661bc0_c.jpg

May I ask where you got this drawing?

ChickeNES Dec 31, 2015 8:57 AM

^Seconded. I'd love to have it as a poster for my apartment.

spyguy Dec 31, 2015 2:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 (Post 7283773)
Just thought I'd share some elevations, dated 10/21. Looks like the "crown" is gone and replaced by actual floor space. Height still reads 887'-2"

https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5703/...ca661bc0_c.jpg

Thanks for posting the elevations. Sort of reminds me of a flipped Torre Verre:
http://s14.postimg.org/gvqudjkcx/Jea...rre_Verre4.jpg
Source

BVictor1 Dec 31, 2015 2:37 PM

^And only 200' shorter.

sentinel Dec 31, 2015 9:20 PM

Skyguy_7, do you have permission to post these working drawings? Renderings are one thing, but I'm always concerned when I see detailed working drawings posted on here..

Skyguy_7 Jan 1, 2016 12:48 AM

^They're from a public FTP site, used to post bid docs for sub-contractors. So, nothing unethical here. I've also got elevation dwgs for the new spire site proposal. Looks like they're keeping with the 2,000' figure.











Jk. Happy new year, all :cheers:

Domer2019 Jan 1, 2016 8:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 (Post 7284960)
^They're from a public FTP site, used to post bid docs for sub-contractors. So, nothing unethical here. I've also got elevation dwgs for the new spire site proposal. Looks like they're keeping with the 2,000' figure.











Jk. Happy new year, all :cheers:


A summary of my reaction:

:burstbubble:

We don't joke about these things ;)

maru2501 Jan 4, 2016 8:09 PM

I got you a pony for Christmas!!!!!!

but it's dead

spyguy Jan 29, 2016 6:00 AM

http://i67.tinypic.com/o511kw.jpg
I also didn't realize the second floor was coworking office space (WeWork).

Kumdogmillionaire Jan 30, 2016 12:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spyguy (Post 7317485)
http://i67.tinypic.com/o511kw.jpg
I also didn't realize the second floor was coworking office space (WeWork).


This rendering definitely makes it easier to swallow the ugly pill that was the height reduction on Medium Jahn.

Viñoly really did well on this one


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.