SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Completed Project Threads Archive (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=348)
-   -   NEW YORK | The Spiral (509 W. 34th) | 1,041 FT | 66 FLOORS (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=184944)

chris08876 Feb 4, 2014 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 6436840)
You mean the children in Jersey, who will be in the darkness the shadows from this building will cast across the Hudson?! Just wait.

Thats good. Less glare when taking pictures from Jersey.

hunser Feb 5, 2014 9:25 PM

Check this out: https://my.rcm1.com/handler/teaser.a...qVLkrU41GzeLQZ

http://i59.tinypic.com/11kytdk.png

http://i61.tinypic.com/2e584si.png

They are aiming for 108 floors and ~1,800ft.

mmikeyphilly Feb 5, 2014 9:52 PM

WOW! If the Hudson Yards project becomes a reality, and if it follows the renderings on the first couple of pages....:hell: All HEdouble hockey sticks are going to break loose! You guys in NY get to have all the fun!:haha:

1800 ft.? That's sweet. One of the renderings make it look like the World Trade Center on steroids! The architects went to McDonald's drive thru, and were probably asked "Do you want that 'Biggy' sized?" Well, He** yeah!

Hope it comes true for "yous" guys! :yes:

King DenCity Feb 5, 2014 10:39 PM

Exciting concept for sure, would love to hear more info.

Onn Feb 5, 2014 11:47 PM

Build it, Build it, Build it! :D

dendenden Feb 5, 2014 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onn (Post 6438615)
Build it, Build it, Build it! :D

I agree 100% Wholeheartedly! go NYC!

NYguy Feb 6, 2014 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunser (Post 6438374)
Check this out: https://my.rcm1.com/handler/teaser.a...qVLkrU41GzeLQZ

They are aiming for 108 floors and ~1,800ft.


I say go for it. Why not.


http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154396667/original.jpg



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154396668/original.jpg



The tower could double in size if the Sherwood portion of the site is thrown in. Not that it would be taller, a larger component could squeeze in potential office space.



http://www.masseyknakal.com/listings...0&ty=6&r=1&tt=


http://www.masseyknakal.com/listingi..._SlideShow.jpg



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154396748/original.jpg

supertallchaser Feb 6, 2014 12:41 AM

^maybe take out the spire and go to the full 1800ft?

chris08876 Feb 6, 2014 12:53 AM

This area is will become the new Pudong of the west. :) NYC is building the big 3 all over again. Hudson Spire, 30 Hudson Yards, and now all we need is a tower that breaks 2000ft. NY tower (Like the Shanghai Tower).

wilfredo267 Feb 6, 2014 4:02 AM

God i'm almost afraid to get excited about this for fear that its just hyperbole.

King DenCity Feb 6, 2014 5:13 AM

^One way or another I feel like NYC will get a +1500 footer proposed this year or early next year.
Either way the magnitude and beauty of NYC will be doubled within a few years.

NYguy Feb 6, 2014 2:11 PM




Quote:

Originally Posted by supertallchaser (Post 6438722)
^maybe take out the spire and go to the full 1800ft?

Quote:

Originally Posted by wilfredo267 (Post 6439043)
God i'm almost afraid to get excited about this for fear that its just hyperbole.


It's a conceptual design, being used to market the site to someone or a team of developers that would likely find such a thing attractive. It takes years to assemble sites large enough and with enough air rights to develop large towers, but here is one gift wrapped with the Hudson Yards zoning. It's early, but Time Warner's move to the Hudson Yards along with the subway expansion makes that area "official". The Hudson Spire would be right in the middle of it all.

Sherwood earlier flirted with the idea of hotel instead of office space for the site. But we'll wait and see if the site is expanded (consolidated) for a larger building.

Submariner Feb 6, 2014 2:16 PM

Yet another reason why we need a new Penn Station - the gateway into this site needs to match the site itself.

Hypothalamus Feb 6, 2014 7:37 PM

It's a good read for people not fimiliar to the site-- renders in the article already posted here...

New York YIMBY:

New Renderings: Hudson Spire
BY: NIKOLAI FEDAK ON FEBRUARY 6TH 2014 AT 6:00 AM

Quote:

....
The height reduction of Related’s tallest tower — at 30 Hudson Yards — will also allow any tower to enjoy completely unobstructed views from a relatively low 1,227 feet. Massey Knakal’s concept highlights luxury residences from the skyscraper’s 80th to 108th floors, and views would definitely be the driving motive behind extreme verticality.
....

manchester united Feb 6, 2014 11:23 PM

To change the title, please : 1800 feet / 108 floors !!!!

Submariner Feb 6, 2014 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manchester united (Post 6440422)
To change the title, please : 1800 feet / 108 floors !!!!

It would be nice to have a rendering done up for the NYC diagram. There are several diagrams in there that are concepts, so I don't see why there shouldn't be one for this proposal. It appears that the height to the roof is 1,800+ feet and we know nothing of a spire yet, but there should be at least a rendering documenting what we currently know...

NYguy Feb 7, 2014 12:43 AM

It's still just a concept. Whatever developer is brought on to the project would choose their own architects for the project.

Thefigman Feb 7, 2014 5:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy (Post 6440564)
It's still just a concept. Whatever developer is brought on to the project would choose their own architects for the project.

Right. This is just filler for the potential buyer to see what could be on the lot.

Submariner Feb 7, 2014 6:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thefigman (Post 6441583)
Right. This is just filler for the potential buyer to see what could be on the lot.

Yeah, I know, I just like seeing it put up on the diagram :D

Still, we have towers like One Vanderbilt up there and that is by no means even close to a finalized proposal.

NYguy Feb 9, 2014 2:13 PM

Under the current scenario, the bulk of the tower would be hotel/condo. If the other piece of the property is obtained from Sherwood Equities (which would no longer be able to build the massive tower they were planning), there could be some office space added to the development. It's all a matter of just who gets the site, and just what will happen with the rest of it.


Quote:

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...TATE/140119991

The Rosenthal family has hired Massey Knakal Realty Services Chairman Bob Knakal and his colleague James Nelson to market a parcel it owns stretching from West 35th to West 34th streets between 10th Avenue and what will be a grand new thoroughfare running through the neighborhood called Hudson Boulevard. That parcel can accommodate as much as 1.2 million square feet of space, including about 200,000 square feet of residential development.

Also, the site sits directly next to another similarly sized piece of land owned by Sherwood Equities, which for years has planned to develop a single super-tower on the two parcels in partnership with the Rosenthals. Now that the Rosenthals are selling, Ryan Nelson (no relation to James), a senior vice president at Sherwood Equities who manages the company's acquisitions and sales, said it, too, will consider selling its parcel to either the buyer of the Rosenthal land or another purchaser.



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154396667/original.jpg



http://www.pbase.com/nyguy/image/154086374/original.jpg



http://mjmacalusoblog.com/


http://mjmacaluso.files.wordpress.co...=370&h=&crop=1



http://mjmacaluso.files.wordpress.co...1000&h=&crop=1



http://mjmacaluso.files.wordpress.co...1000&h=&crop=1



http://mjmacaluso.files.wordpress.co...1000&h=&crop=1



http://mjmacaluso.files.wordpress.co...1200&h=&crop=1


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.