![]() |
Quote:
|
That didn't take long
Delete
|
Quote:
|
just saw this:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...lans-1.3484648 I think that a similar approach could be done for the Chicago Post Office, leave the big floor plates for office/retail, and put residential on top, almost like a city within a city |
^^^Nope, residential makes absolutely no sense in any capacity in this building. I don't know why anyone would think otherwise, it's already been discussed ad nauseum that office is the only logical use for floorplates this large. This is a merch mart clone, would you suggest they should kick Motorola out and fill the upper floors with residential there?
|
But there's just not that much demand for that kind of office space. Even the Mart is no more than 15 percent tech offices, and none of those are in windowless spaces.
Setting aside the Van Buren building, you can really only use the first 30 feet of the perimeter for residential—and only the first 80 feet of the perimeter for office. The workroom building is 344 by 652 feet! You could put colocation rack space in the center, but I don't know if there's that much server space required in the entire state of Illinois. That's why I feel like you'd have to demolish the center of the top 8-10 floors and create some kind of atrium, winter garden, or light court. It could be large enough and amenity-filled enough to have residential units face it, or a little less generous and faced with office windows. Probably a combination. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And even 15% of the Merchandise Mart is 600K sqft; given that it's only been converting to tech tenants for a few years, it seems like there is significant demand (especially given the success of other large-floorplate office conversions like 600W Chicago, 1000W Fulton, and the River Center). I'm not saying it'd be easy or necessarily the fastest to lease up, but it doesn't seem implausible that the building could be reused without cutting huge light wells into it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Even if they were really conservative in calculating the foundations for the post office, you probably could only support 4-5 additional stories. To go higher than that, you'd have to put down new piers and caissons, which means not only going down through the old building but also avoiding the highway and railroad tracks underneath. |
Casinos and outlet malls don't need windows.
|
Quote:
Additionally, they don't have to lease out the entire building at once since the structure already exists. It's not like new construction where you need to justify construction of the superstructure, you can lease it out and do TI as you find the tenants. |
Quote:
|
Why not tear out the guts of some of the building and just do what they did on the Michigan, Monroe, Wabash block for the Legacy and build a tower or two on the inside? Seems like that could work just as well as trying to do some hamfisted/forced attempt to shove offices into an industrial sized floor plate.
|
Someday I hope they push the Metra Rock Island terminus a little farther south and demolish the Chicago Stock exchange viaduct over Congress. It would open up the Congres Blvd Vista and allow a new tower to be built over the new Metra terminus on Congress.
Demolish the eastern side of the post office and just leave the larger annex portion of the building to renovate. |
Quote:
When that happens, Metra should buy the trading floor and turn it into a ticket hall, maybe with a new glassy facade like the tollway oases. http://i68.tinypic.com/2qxrdz4.jpg |
The building is too large it will stay around in the planning stages for a while.
|
Quote:
|
This is for premium viewers, but here is an article in today's edition of Crains about the New York firm that is under contract to buy the Old Post Office.
They seem like the right kind of firm to do this deal, if they can close on it as planned. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.