The designs of those towers are gorgeous, not too simple and ve'd. Just what Chicago needs.
|
Depending on the time between phases, I'd bet the design aesthetics will get mashed up as it's built. When has a mega-project ever fulfilled its original renderings through all the phases?
edit: sorry ardecila already pretty much said this above. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I would not worry about the towers looking all alike. The developers themselves said this buildout will take at least 10 years, so the chances that each of the 4 phases has a different design is pretty high. The original LSE renders had all (fairly ugly) towers looking like mirror images of each other, with varying heights. We ended up getting a very diverse collection of towers after 15-20 years. |
Quote:
|
I've worked on Goose Island for the last 10 years and all I can say is any development is positive.
|
Not sure if this was mentioned previously but appears the Riverside Development just south of Halsted Point is off the table now.
https://news.yahoo.com/developer-giv...204100670.html |
Quote:
Hope that doesn't mean anything for this project. |
Quote:
|
O'Donnell cited this being included in the 20% ARO pilot area as a reason for cancellation in addition to Covid.
Obvious side effect of saddling developers with cumbersome "do gooder" regulation that flies in the face of market forces: less housing. |
Quote:
Sounds like he just doesn't want to deal with affordable housing. |
Quote:
Aaron (Glowrock) |
Quote:
Also the rents between the tribune site and prime West Loop sites are probably significantly lower. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Zoning app is up, no notable changes: https://chicago.legistar.com/Legisla...vanced&Search=
|
Oh hell yes, the tallest building will now rise 691' according to the latest plans.
https://urbanize.city/chicago/post/h...-design-change https://urbanize.city/chicago/sites/...?itok=L0bHlHO7 |
Quote:
Plan Commission Presentation: https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/...on_8.16.21.pdf |
These huge master planned developments right along rivers and bodies of water sure must be popular for developers because they pretty much never have to build through streets.
Great excuse for cul-de-sacs, which are attractive to future residents who value privacy and have "safety" concerns |
Not really much of a spot for a through street on this one.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.