|
Quote:
|
Quote:
that what might have been meant was 1,300 feet long rather than deep. The Google tells me that the highest point in Elysian Park is about 750 feet, so for the workers to be 550 feet below sea level seems unnecessary. |
Thanks FW. The 1,300 depth has been driving me crazy.
http://imageshack.com/a/img924/3082/Kevd5h.gif |
Quote:
At first I thought the diagonal line was the tunnel, but it does an about turn at the bottom. is that an electrical line instead? |
Elysian Park Tunnel Rescue
:previous: The diagonal line I see running SW from the red Water Works building leads to the reservoir at the bottom
(the line branches off on the full map, with the other line leading to another reservoir), so I figure it's a tunnel, if not the tunnel from your photo. _________________________________________________ Here's a question for you, e_r . . . which tunnel on the map you posted did these guys get themselves stuck in? http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...f.jpg~original http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...t.jpg~original December 23, 1935, Los Angeles Times @ ProQuest via LAPL Here are three photos (confusingly all dated December 31) of the rescue, apparently from different sections of the tunnel: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...j.jpg~original uclamss_1429_13300 http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...k.jpg~original uclamss_1429_13301 http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...o.jpg~original uclamss_1429_13302 The mustachioed Mr. Cheatham and his associate Mr. Harmer after their rescue: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...c.jpg~original uclamss_1429_13299 Photos from Los Angeles Times Photographic Archive. Department of Special Collections, Charles E. Young Research Library, UCLA. |
Quote:
Many noirishers know Jim for "California Crazy" and its sequel, both on roadside vernacular architecture. --------------------------------- Impressive you recognizing the 3rd South Pasadena Masonic Lodge building unihikid. Good eye! |
Quote:
!,300 feet does not make sense for the depth. :previous: |
MYSTERY TUNNEL TRAPS TWO MEN
Quote:
First of all the mention of the bridge http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/320...922/KThbNp.jpg water and power says "the Riverside-Figueroa Bridge,previous location of the Dayton Ave Bridge." I thought the tunnel might have something to do with the old Dayton Viaduct. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800...924/8rQJGh.jpg la creek freak also because of the the mention of irrigation tunnels & the fact it was found high up from the bank of the river. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/320...922/QbIo5D.jpg :previous: update: I was in such a hurry to figure out the mystery when I read "viaduct" my brain read "aqueduct". (Duh) so this theory is shot to hell :( ___________________________________________________________________________________ OK, lets try this again. THEORY #2 Then I remembered the part in the article where it said the tunnel turned "southward". http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640...924/5d1v9z.jpg :previous: did they mean to say 'westly' direction instead of 'eastly' direction? (east doesn't make sense :shrug:) Despite the directions, I believe it's NUMBER #8 on the 1938 map. (detail below) http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800...923/JAWmUB.jpg http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640...924/K5MsAT.jpg Is this the one you thought it might be FW? __ |
:previous: Well, 8 connecting to 7 is the closest fit to the printed description. I wouldn't want to speculate beyond that.
|
:previous:
#7 had crossed my mind as well, but it was only a ditch. (used until about 1894) _ |
:previous: Then forget I mentioned #7. :)
|
lol :)
Well I thought about #7 too, remember. I was desperate....it's the only way the directions printed in the article make any sense. _ |
One more post before I call it a night.
This is another photo by photographer Robert Frank (the Movie Usherettes, Los Angeles 1956 guy) And it's a mystery location folks. http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/102...924/4w2x7A.jpg art institute of chicago "Los Angeles, 1955" Gelatin silver print 21.1 x 33.3 cm (image); 28 x 35.5 cm (paper) |
Ethereal: "I believe we finally found the correct building- What do ya'll think?"
It's possible, but I remain somewhat skeptical, one reason being that the windows at the left in the interior photo don't match up with the exterior fenestration on the building. While it's true that the fenestration might have changed since the 1910s, the exterior doesn't look to me as though it has been substantially altered. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Looking at Historic Aerials and fuzzy pictures at USC, it looks like the Rocky's building on the corner had gone by 1964, and its neighbors on the left by 1970. The buildings on the right (Watkins department store in 1956) were replaced by 1980. |
Quote:
Speaking about school in those long ago days....I absolutely disliked the insipid Dick and Jane books. My preferred reading in 3rd grade was TIME magazine. The overhead catenary of trolley wires seem to cloud the sky. Fun photo ER. https://i.pinimg.com/236x/4b/ea/80/4...rs-mercury.jpg https://i.pinimg.com/236x/4b/ea/80/4...rs-mercury.jpg Lucy at MGM studios with that long trailer and a 1950s era Mercury as the Star. http://www.diecast.org/assets/images...ng-trailer.png http://www.diecast.org/assets/images...ng-trailer.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
While the grille-less design was considered modern, the '53 Mercury's basic styling was in its second year. The engine was anything but modern--its V8 was a 125-hp (about 85hp in modern terms) descendant of the first Ford flathead that came out in 1932 models, still prone to vapor lock and overheating, and it would finally be replaced by an overhead-valve V8 in the '54 Merc. Quote:
Here's its flathead...heads never removed...(power steering had been introduced on Fords and Mercurys in July '53, the month my car came off the line): https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/FH...M=w800-h479-no |
Quote:
The building is not leaning; the street actually slopes. It should really look like this: https://scontent-lax3-2.xx.fbcdn.net...f2&oe=5A95A8E2 http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/102...924/9fguiS.jpg gsv By the way, this Papa John's location closed some time this year. The Korean-owned Japanese restaurant in the space to the right of it, though, is still open. I also live a few blocks away from this building. According to a book I have called "South Pasadena 1888-1988: A Centennial History," it's not mentioned that this building ever housed a Masonic Temple. I would have to read through it again to be sure, I suppose, but according to this picture I took from the book, this building a long time ago housed a garage and record publishing company: https://scontent-lax3-2.xx.fbcdn.net...59&oe=5A96C736 It's interesting to me that the garage was where the restaurant is now. Also, notice the curbside gas pump. Looking at the modern photo again, I guess it is possible that this might've housed a Masonic Temple. I read somewhere that this building used to only have 2 stories, and a third story was added later. When it only had 2 stories, it could have had a higher ceiling... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.