![]() |
There’s 2 lots here with W. Court Pl cutting thru the middle of the site. Hoping with a new plan we’ll see the smaller, north lot go residential/hotel >1000’ and the south lot along Washington can be your 800’ office building.
Always seemed like an odd site to combine for one fat ass tower IMO. Maybe as demand creeps up like we’re seeing, someone could see my vision thru. |
This project is still alive, and damn do the new renderings look good!
PD: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/gisimage...pds/PD1293.pdf |
Quote:
|
Very nice.
|
Nice. I like the interchanging terraces. It'll bring some variety to the loop. I kinda wish there were more of them, however then it would start to look like those Aqua copycats in Toronto.
|
Still too short. Needs to be 900 feet or taller to stand out...
|
Quote:
if this was any other city, a 700 footer would be skyline changing. But here it's just infill. Either way, hope to see this massive vacant lot bite the dust |
Quote:
The terraces do look cool though, other than that it's just a blue box. Way too many blue boxes in this area. |
Wow love the wavy terraces, this new render looks great! Hope it gets built.
|
|
Quote:
Is there any info on square footage? I didn't see any in the pdf. I'm gonna guess 1.3 million as those bottom floor plates are very bulky. I would love to see a hotel component on this site but I'll take this any day. |
730' at this location is so meh. The terraces and sky garden are cool at least, hopefully it won't be dumbed down if they find a tenant.
Still hoping JP Morgan Chase chooses this location and gives us a 900' signature Tower...one can hope. |
That big terrace is pretty cool, but the rest of it reminds me of a regular glass box apartment or condo building.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The new design looks promising, but as someone else mentioned, it looks ripe for the VE hatchet. |
The middle design was super boring, glad that's no longer a thing.
The balconies of the new one kind of remind me of something out of Singapore, they're pretty cool and I hope they remain untouched. It's sad how negative everything is surrounding development is these days. A semi decent proposal arises and the immediate (yet unfortunately realistic) reaction is that it must be too good to be true and we'll be VE'd to death. Quote:
900' is also meh and really is not much on the global stage these days, or in Chicago. |
Quote:
And yeah the top portion is incredibly boxy and boring. The bottom portion is only cool because of that cool terrace portion. And the terraces up from an office perspective aren't even practical for a lot. In one of my company's buildings in NYC, there's a big terrace on the 16th floor but we never once used it out of abundance of caution/danger. They refused any of us to step out there. |
Quote:
They'll probably put a logo on it though (which I personally wouldn't mind). |
Was there ever an impression that there would be an 800' or higher skyscraper here? From what I've seen all of the proposals from the past 10 or so years have always been around the same height.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.