Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
(Post 6961056)
Thanks, that's easy enough to understand.
Jjs5650...
I knew that the plans were to preserve two of the buildings, the buildings that you mentioned. If the three other buildings, The Pioneer Fruit Company and the buildings at 301 and 305 East Buchanan are to be demolished then why did combusean link to ROPE's for the three buildings? Why seek historical designation for buildings that will be torn down? :shrug:
|
I didn't link to ROPEs for three buildings, I linked to the specific ROPE for the building in question that will be razed for surface parking, the Pioneer Fruit Company Warehouse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aznsunsurfer
I had been demanding that this forum emulate those of skyscrapercity. Project updates, announcements, pictures and that's it. I guess my request fell on death ears. At least we enjoy the commentary from those who no longer live in Phoenix (the irony).
|
Like anyone has any more right to post here more than anyone else. I don't know about anyone else who's moved on, but if Phoenix had jobs in my field, I'd probably still be there after living downtown six years and in the metro for twenty-six years. A significant chunk of the types of my coworkers today absolutely prefer thriving urban environments, so maybe, just maybe if Phoenix had a thriving urban environment itself it'd do better at attracting startups and qualified employees, so yeah, I'm curious to see if Phoenix will ever get the same. Many people who have had cared deeply about Phoenix had to leave because after a while, it gets too painful waiting for something that just won't arrive on a decent timetable. By that metric, I'd say Jjs cares more about the health of downtown Phoenix than just about anyone here by the nature of his posts, but that's just my impression.
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixheadphones
I totally agree- I'm going to try and be more active in posting projects, ect, and hopefully we can change the tone a bit. I'm all for a bit of commentary when a project is discussed, but save the rest of this for the General Phoenix thread, or somewhere else entirely.
|
If I moderate too much, people complain about a heavy hand. If I don't moderate, as I've defaulted to other than sorting out wildly off topic or incendiary posts, people complain about there not being enough moderation.
The projects in Phoenix have *always* been contentious. Some people don't give a crap about an old "ugly" building, others are emphatic about its preservation. Phoenix is unique like that as this city has such few old bones, so replacement projects are going to raise a few more eyebrows, especially when they go to crap like surface parking and 5-story pedestrian dead-zones.
In a city like SF (or any place where they really are building skyscrapers) nobody really cares about razing a building from the 1920s as they're outmoded, not that comparatively old, are possibly unsafe, and the city itself is suffering from a massive housing and office shortage, therefore a decently sized redevelopment is a welcome reproach by many urbanists.
By in large part, I have not seen that bigger and better here, just a decade of a lot of crap that's built to be sold or is otherwise lowest common denominator garbage, if it gets built at all--with few exceptions.