![]() |
Quote:
|
|
A few months back I saw an ad pop up for the tower directly west of the Cooper along the river, but then I never saw it again. I thought that was really curious. Hopefully there is an announcement on another tower within the next year.
|
Is this project still U/C or did covid postpone it?
Would be nice to see some new shots. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That site that you said was being cleared is the site for the tallest tower of the development which is exciting :cheers: |
Quote:
|
^Seems very unlikely that would be the next building to go up. More likely some infrastructure thing. It was Building E, further south, that was supposedly in for permits, but I've lost my inside source at Perkins+Will.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5744cf22_c.jpg ( not my photo - from dog sitter I found on Rover ) Dee used to love the Alta Grand Central site when it was all fenced off - her own private running area. |
Just read an article that Lendlease has refinanced some of its recent developments, including its projects here, and it plans to use the capital towards new construction.
So I expect them to keep plodding along |
The plot next to Harrison is the prestige site, though because of the visibility from Congress... they've talked about doing something very tall there, possibly even a mass timber skyscraper (although that seemed more like a thought exercise than a real proposal).
https://www.constructiondive.com/new...hicago/428350/ I doubt they would push a project forward on this site in the middle of a recession when they have several other parcels on which to build first. Wherever the next phase will go, I hope they start soon! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
South Bank Phase II won't break ground before spring, at the earliest, according to someone in the know.
|
Quote:
|
I see the little fenced-off area (purple square) lines up with Franklin Street, and I think it's most likely for access to grout the old freight tunnels running through where the Building E foundations will be sunk further south.
https://i.imgur.com/PU4r02C.png |
Given the skepticism that a lot of industry leaders are showing for multifamily in the next year or so, this might be jumping the gun a bit ... but it's "news" nonetheless:
All About E: The New 34-Story Skyscraper Coming to the South Loop Chicago Architecture Blog |
“Skyscraper” is really stretching it!
|
Quote:
|
https://www.chicagotribune.com/real-...qxe-story.html
As some fear downturn in downtown real estate due to pandemic, Southbank developer doubles down with luxury condos at The Reed By ARIEL CHEUNG CHICAGO TRIBUNE | DEC 15, 2020 AT 5:00 AM "Word around Chicago real estate circles is that COVID-19 has slowed residential sales downtown, as more people work remotely and seek out larger homes with more elbow room and outdoor space in outer neighborhoods and suburbs. Lendlease Chicago’s executive general manager of development Ted Weldon, however, sees nothing but promise for downtown home sales in the coming years — which is fortunate, as his company is readying for its next phase of the Southbank development on the edge of the Chicago River." "Set to open in 2023, The Reed will be set on the South Branch of the river, with 216 condominiums and 224 apartments spread across 41 floors at 234 W. Polk St. in the South Loop." One-, two- and three-bedroom condos will be sold starting at $390,000 and will range from 630 to 1,670 square feet. Located on floors 23 to 41, the condos will have views that can reach as far as Lake Michigan, Weldon said. Apartments will be located on floors 9 to 22. Below them, a 12,000-square-foot outdoor deck is among building amenities that also include a demo kitchen and a private lounge exclusively for condo owners. "The Reed" https://uniim1.shutterfly.com/ng/ser...071815/enhance |
Looks like the base got heavily VE'd. Not surprising
|
|
At least there's still a riverwalk:
https://thereedsouthbank.com/imager/...6bc6b5f986.jpg (Lendlease website) |
.
|
|
The Reed
More like the Ugly. Lendlease, you guys really dropped the ball, mate! :runaway:
|
|
I like the darker color and the SW corner shot of the podium looks decent. North side of the podium (facing the park) is a let down after seeing the old rendering but overall a slight improvement in my opinion... I feel like the old tower would've looked dated in a few years
|
Quote:
I would say that it did not necessarily get VE'd (just going by the previous publicly released renderings - can't speak to any previous unreleased versions), as those renderings were very likely just placeholders. If they were just pretty drawings and not actually planned version of the tower, then there's nothing to really VE. Correct me if I'm wrong and they had started out working on blueprints corresponding to them. Also, is this still Perkins and Will? I like it (judged on its own). Nice tower. |
Quote:
|
Disappointing. I really liked the V columns along the river, the similar base to The Cooper, and the unsymmetrical, serrated facade. I also liked how the whole development was supposed to be a small white city within the city (World's Fair reference?)
On the positive side, was there a height increase? |
Quote:
|
Underwhelming.
|
Annnnnnnndddddd, we're back in Chicago. The original placeholder was more like Miami.
|
I'm guessing the inclusion of condos caused the parking need to get bigger, so the garage "ate up" the liner units on the podium and the upper reaches of the loggia along the river.
Unfortunately I don't think it's possible to sell condos for the foreseeable future without parking - it seemed for a little while that this truism of the Chicago market would die off with the growth of TOD, but Covid has dealt a serious setback to this progress. It does seem like the rentals will largely be free of parking, however. |
Quote:
EDIT: I'm noticing more changes, like a reduction in balconies and flattening of the serrations. Whatever, just happy this development is progressing more or less as planned. If they are going to invest in one building, I would prefer it to be the tallest one along Harrison. That one is going to make or brake the design of the whole plot. As it is, the extension of the riverwalk south of Congress and renovations to River City are huge wins. The design of this new tower is ok. If the facade is good, it'll be a fine addition. In the renders, I can't quite tell but it looks like painted concrete. |
That sucks. Losing the v columns and flattening the base really cheapen the look of this thing. And isn't Lendlease responsible for the VE monstrosity at 855 W Madison?
|
I actually think the modified tower doesn't look too bad.
I always hate podia, but even this podium isn't too horrible. |
The revised tower would be fine elsewhere, but it's directly fronting the river, and an increasingly trafficked stretch of river...this plot of land deserves better imo.
|
I generally prefer darker towers over lighter ones, but this redesign is pretty underwhelming. The podium treatment is awkward and I miss the angles of the previous design. I think the facade comparisons to 845 Madison are fair -- and not flattering (same architect maybe?).
What happened to the requirement that the riverwalk had to be "open to the air above?" I believe that influenced the taller height of the previous loggia (and 110 wacker). On the plus side, there's no way they're going to sell enough condos to make this happen any time soon. :haha: |
Quote:
I'm not sure how a site like 110 Wacker would be handled under the current guidelines. It may not be developable. |
Quote:
The PD only called for 3 floors open over the riverwalk. It looks like they are still providing that minimum. Even so I wonder if this requires a PD amendment since things like the liner units are written into the PD. Edit: nevermind on the first part, looking at the renderings again now I can see all 5 levels of the garage. |
Quote:
Thing is, there is a disconnect. Many would like a grand and public riverfront. But we rely on developers with no such incentive. Whatever is enough to get renters or buyers is enough. If this development had included office components, there might be incentive to do something more interesting to meet the needs of workers and create a statement that would lure companies that want to be part of that image and appeal to new employees. |
Quote:
|
I'm so tired of seeing the grandeur of an original development proposal followed by the actual proposal. I personally loved the Miamiesque design of this building along with the V supports at the river. This version, if it is the final version, is basically a yawn that protrudes over a river walk. No one will point at this building and say "Wow, look at that. What a cool building. I'd love to live there." Sure, once it's built people may say "I'd love to live there" but it won't happen because of how the building looks but rather where the building is located. Such a shame.
|
The Reed is now selling units and the website got an Update
https://thereedsouthbank.com/ https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/...chicago-river/ Also if you click the link below and scroll to the bottom you'll see a new site plan https://thereedsouthbank.com/southbank/ and a nice drawing https://thereed-prod.imgix.net/asset...step=100&w=600 |
Quote:
Seems like we lost the nice original design of the tallest tower, not loving how this is going. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 4:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.