Quote:
Curious to see how The Blue turns out as they incorporate their tower into the exterior facade. Project has been kind of quiet lately, last update I remember is the website going live. Quote:
|
Hansji is luhrs block and they have to have a 50' easement from the north side of the block to preserve the Luhrs Arcade in between the two older high-rises.
Thunderbird Legacy (formerly known as Blue) released updated renderings on their website and I suspect it will break ground spring of next year if it's still a real project. |
Quote:
We are talking about the old Sing High building, also owned by Hansji Corporation. |
Quote:
There's an old photo of the Pratt Gilbert building (which looks confused with the building behind it) and surprise, it's just a garage where those stone inserts are. https://www.instagram.com/p/B_8xbHZH840/ I suspect similar conservation easements for Pratt Gilbert and Stag/Patio will occur but those lots look too small to redevelop on their own and have such an easement without being assembled. |
Quote:
https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4452...8192?entry=ttu |
Quote:
|
They are listed as historic, but why, I'm not entirely sure. I sorta like the brickwork on Sing High but as far as art deco it's still pretty ugly...maybe there's something underneath that stucco on the second floor... maybe.
If you remove the non historic stone elements on 1W you could get some arcade and I like those historic columns ... but I'm just not seeing any purpose of preserving these outright. |
The proposed development is only the South half of the block, 1W Madison and Sing High would remain with possible renovations. I believe its a 15-story residential building that is proposed.
|
Quote:
Quote:
https://azbigmedia.com/real-estate/h...ouse-district/ Quote:
|
Arguing buildings should be saved simply because they are old undermines the whole preservation movement because it strikes outsiders as unreasonable. There’s nothing noteworthy about the Sing Hi building; in fact it’s a dump. Preservationists would fare better with a targeted approach rather than a blanket “save it” policy.
|
Quote:
But I'm just becoming an Old now myself. I'm not going to try standing in the way of someone's private development. I agree that actual historic preservation needs a targeted approach in the grand scheme of things. If these buildings ultimately meet the wrecking ball, I just think that would suck and would make our City less interesting. Old buildings are typically cooler and show better craftsmanship and overall building materials than new builds, height be damned. |
If we are really lucky we can save the Sing Ha Building and it can sit ugly and abandoned for a decade just like Melrose Liquors!!!!!:koko:
|
Quote:
That was a ridiculous situation. However, if Melrose Liquors actually could be used and look nice (or just not deteriorate in the first place) it would be a cool building and use to keep around for that neighborhood. All other factors disregarded. |
|
Quote:
Also, has anyone heard of the construction status of X phase 2? There still isn't any movement on construction starting back up since halting a month ago. This seems to be more than just a little contract dispute. :shrug: |
Quote:
|
Debated where to drop this but Its not really a stadium development:
Do we know where this is going? its in the warehouse district but which block? from scratch or is it reusing old buildings? I cant seem to find any specifics even with very detailed renderings. https://azbex.com/wp-content/uploads...10/Mercury.png |
^ This is the Lincoln Union property that the Mercury is taking over, discussed in either the stadium thread or here a few pages back.
|
Quote:
|
Does anybody have any details on what this might involve? Implies might be multifamily and hotel.
https://apps-secure.phoenix.gov/PDD/...Number=2306032 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.