Quote:
on a serious note, 2Pru and FC are like our junior level supertalls; they're technically there, but they certainly don't feel like they deserve the distinction. |
Yes I agree. Buildings like Bank of America, N.Y. Times and Chrisler in N.Y. feel the same way. They all just don't have the same presence as buildings that are 1000ft plus to the roof.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hadn't noticed this earlier but that wide gap between buildings really helps to preserve the lake views of the folks over in the Trump building. How nice of Related to do that. |
Quote:
|
No, lets not use the existing foundation for one grand massing tower, Instead lets split the site and add visual clutter to the lakefront. Let this die on the vine.
|
Quote:
Wolf Point and 400 N LSD are really the width-wise Hancock/Sears pair going forward. |
Quote:
and those who actually build tall buildings. Buildings become less efficient the higher you go—geometrically so. There's the amount of floorspace required for elevators and exit stairs, the strength of the concrete, the time needed for construction. That's why the Spire went through three iterations, each trying to hang more units on the same set of elevator shafts. Do you really think Related and SOM didn't run the numbers? Do you think they just picked the floor counts based on the CEO and his daughter's ages? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I hope they give this project an intriguing name. Don't get me wrong. I think there is power behind a street address like say 300 N LaSalle or 432 N Park, but for this guy I hope they come up with something. Being able to call Vista, Vista, has a better ring to it than like 310 E Wacker.
|
Quote:
|
Why? This is not an office tower. Trip generation rates for residential highrises are quite small, and for those sold at superpremium prices to nonresidents, transit boardings are less than rounding error. There just aren't that many cleaning ladies coming by every day.
|
Quote:
(Lower Carol st between State and Dearborn - Marina City) |
It's very fortunate for Chicago that the cost of developing buildings is a fraction of what it is in NY because it makes projects like much more viable and easy to build. Due to the obscene costs of land acquisition and labor, towers like this could never have a rental component in NY. In fact, towers like this couldn't even rise in NY as condos priced at less than $5k/sf, and the market for that price range obviously is limited.
I look forward to these beauties. |
Quote:
On that note, it's very fortunate for me that my mom had ovaries because if she had testes I wouldn't have been born. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Beresford, Majestic, San Remo, Dakota, Apthorp....
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.