Quote:
|
Quote:
The freight tracks in Chicago were all grade-separated 80-100 years ago to remove the trains from the busy streets below. Today, grade-separation is usually a matter of moving the crossing roads onto over or underpasses. Road overpasses create unsightly views and underpasses have drainage issues. They're both relatively inexpensive solutions, though. Has anybody done any cost-benefit studies of grade-separation by modifying the rail tracks? I think a open-cut arrangement like the one in Winnetka is desirable. At several points in Barrington, the land drops off and the railroad becomes higher than grade level, so it wouldn't involve as much excavation as it seems. This is of course extremely unrealistic, but it's what I'd like to see happen in a perfect world. Sound-barrier technology also exists that is reasonably-priced, and could be implemented relatively quickly. So far, the Barrington coalition's strategy is purely aimed at stalling CN and putting off the approval of the EJ&E purchase by requiring CN to perform an Environmental Impact Statement. All this will do is postpone the increase in rail traffic, and the problems with road traffic will be even worse as more development happens in the surrounding area. Rather than creating bad blood with CN by angrily delaying them at every turn, why not work cooperatively with them on mitigation projects? |
Quote:
The results of the Palatine survey were that it wasn't worth the cost and effort, but I don't remember how far off the numbers were. I'll see if I can dig up the study. |
Quote:
I suggest these so-called leaders have their meeting in an el train endlessly circling the loop until they have a solution. There will be no bathroom breaks. (Isn't that what some riders use the little one seat booth at the end of the cars for?) No food or beverages. Every time the el goes round the loop once each "leader" will pay $2 out of his own pocket. I also suggest voter vote these idiots out of office. And if no one is running against use your vote for a right in protest cause the uncontested candidates will win no matter what you do. Posted by: MACK | Nov 14, 2007 2:46:22 PM |
Quote:
Cary recently (within the last 20 years) built a nice underpass on Cary-Algonquin Road, which is nowhere near as highly-traveled as Northwest Highway, Palatine Road, Arlington Heights Road, Lake-Cook Road, or Highway 59. Franklin Park also has built a new underpass on Grand Avenue as part of CREATE. The chances of Barrington building an underpass at Hwy 14/Northwest Hwy are very good, considering the road's tremendous volume of traffic. The other grade crossings, probably not. |
Quote:
Grand Avenue was desperately needed because the trains at that location are passing between yards and often stop across the roadway if there is a backlog or delay in switching. |
Did I hear correctly on the radio yesterday morning that the tax increase proposed by some to fund the CTA that the governor is against would only mean Chicagoans paying an extra 25 cents for every $100 spent, and residents in the 6 county region would only be paying an extra 50 cents for every $100 spent? That's what someone was saying that was in support of the tax increase as opposed to raising fares which would obviously hit riders much harder than the measely 25 cent tax increase on $100 spent.
|
Quote:
|
Blago calls out Madigan for not bringing the sales tax plan to a vote in the Senate, but then pledges to veto that same tax plan should the Senate pass it.
IL government is full of shit. I think the gas-tax plan would have some momentum if not for the governor's attitude. As it stands, I don't think any plan for transit-funding can secure a veto-proof majority, so the governor can basically dictate his terms and the 51-65% of legislators have to comply if they want to get anything passed at all. |
I don't get it. Blago doesn't want to burden poor people with a sales tax, but at the same time it is the poor people who rely the most on transit.
So if he drops the ball on transit, he still ends up burdening them. Makes no sense |
I kind of liked the idea of redirecting the gas-tax in the 6 CHicagoland counties to go to the CTA.
|
Quote:
|
^ Yes. They not only shot it down but embarassed him in the process (deservingly too since the GRT was one of the worst ideas to come out of Springfield in recent memory). Maybe Blago can get some "testicular verility" (his words not mine) and show some leadership on this issue.
|
Quote:
This discussion is from 2 weeks ago, but I have since learned information that caused me to change my original response to this post (my original response: local Woodlawn groups worried about crime fought to tear the el down and now the area is "vibrant" with 200K and 300K condos): basically, the Woodlawn groups (who were church based in a crime ridden area) should have learned from the experiences of another church-based group in a crime-ridden area, New Bethel Life, in West Garfield Park, that, instead of fighting for the Lake St. Green Line El to be dismantled, instead built around it: an arts center, a community center at Lake St. & Pulaski (i.e. right next to the El), senior housing, residential housing that they are now trying to sell at affordable rates and market price, retail development etc. etc. Instead of seeking to get rid of the El, they actually fought for more El stations. I don't know the crime rates in West Garfield Park currently, but they can't be any worse than the areas south of 63rd st. So, basically, (and in contrast to what I argued before) the myopic hostility to transit lines in Woodlawn was extremely short-sighted, leaving those areas with oddly situated housing on what should be a retail thoroughfare, and no little to no public transportation, in contrast to West Garfield Park, which has sought out TOD options and retail development. anyway, apologies for beating a dead horse. i just wanted to clarify my stance. |
^ Glad you came around on that issue. I suppose we'd expect nothing less from the U. of C. ;)
In general, I never support reduction in urban infrastructure. |
Quote:
More nonsense..... http://www.pioneerlocal.com/barringt...507-s1.article Barrington leaders speak out against Canadian National's plans November 15, 2007 By TONY A. SOLANO Staff Writer Barrington trustees spoke adamantly at Monday's meeting about the negative impact the purchase of the EJ & E Railroad by the Canadian National Railway could bring to the area. Barrington trustees spoke adamantly at Monday's meeting about the negative impact the purchase of the EJ & E Railroad by the Canadian National Railway could bring to the area. |
Did I read that right "abandon tracks along the city’s lakefront and in the South Loop."
That would be nice :banana: :yes: :banana: |
More sheer idiocy from my neighbors... my god. Absolutely NOBODY is talking solutions, only griping about the problems and campaigning against the increase in trains - as if they have any power to stop it.
Seriously, all we can do is plan around the increase in traffic, and make our town better and safer in the process. |
I was working with this idea over the weekend, and I'm posting it in response to a comment in the Boom Rundown thread.
Quote:
The Lakefront Line - built in several phases. Part I involves the dedication of two tracks along the Metra Electric line to regular CTA trains, and the construction of stations every 1/2 mile. Part II is a tunnel bored from South Water Street Station beneath Stetson and under the river, north up Columbus/Fairbanks/DeWitt, west on Delaware, and then up Rush Street and Division to meet and join the Red Line tracks at an expanded Clark/Division Station. Part III goes north from Clark/Division along LaSalle, Clark, and Broadway to meet the Red Line tracks at Wilson. (This third part is sort of a wish-list item, but Part II is serious) http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/5...ontlinelb3.jpg |
[QUOTE]The Lakefront Line - built in several phases. Part I involves the dedication of two tracks along the Metra Electric line to regular CTA trains, and the construction of stations every 1/2 mile. Part II is a tunnel bored from South Water Street Station beneath Stetson and under the river, north up Columbus/Fairbanks/DeWitt, west on Delaware, and then up Rush Street and Division to meet and join the Red Line tracks at an expanded Clark/Division Station. Part III goes north from Clark/Division along LaSalle, Clark, and Broadway to meet the Red Line tracks at Wilson. (This third part is sort of a wish-list item, but Part II is serious)[QUOTE]
This should be on the agenda. But instead we'll be talking about propping up the existing El system for the foreseeable future... As someone who lives on the north side but works in hyde park though, I can say I'd ride this every day and happily so. Obviously, it would be great for the olympics too. Maybe once Obama become prez he'll help shepherd through some federal funds for this kind of project. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 8:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.