/\ preach!!!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Otherwise the city would have just eminent domained the two buildings long ago. |
Did they get an extension on this project or did the approval from the city expire?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
With Google coming to the Loop in 4 years this will be the perfect spot for a residential or mixed-use supertall
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
is there anyone who's actually sad that this thing died on the vine?
https://i.postimg.cc/50PC6jKT/4998f3...5357-s-4-2.jpg |
I’d love to see JPMorgan Chase build a slender trophy skyscraper there with absurd floor to floor heights that push 1100’ to 1300’ tall
|
They should build a supertall with similar configuration to 300 N Michigan (hotel + apartments). There aren't any worthwhile hotels in that immediate area, plus as UrbanDweller mentioned, Google adding 5k+ jobs will definitely spur the need of more high end housing. I have a feeling this permit expiring was a huge blessing in disguise.
|
Quote:
Is there still a chance Chase could get a hold this site? And if they did what are the odds they go mixed-use? That could be pretty epic... no more blown opportunities hopefully. |
Quote:
large scale office/residential mixed-use towers haven't been built in chicago for over 30 years now. |
Quote:
Tribune East Tower is supposed to be mixed use as well, no? |
Quote:
Chase is not going to develop the piece of land in question into a hotel/condo tower. |
Quote:
I just fear that a pure office tower wouldn't top 900 or so feet. 1,100+ would be a better height for this parcel. |
A friend of mine who works in the area that finances major projects for Chase told me he keeps hearing chatter from his higher ups regarding a replacement Chase tower. Who knows how true that is and whether it would be here but its nice to dream!
|
Quote:
In the entire history of Chicago, there have only been two office towers built with occupiable height above 900', Sears and Aon, and they're both now nearing a half-century old. I wouldn't bet on a third happening anytime soon. Not if the past is anything to go on.... |
Quote:
Philly and SF managed to pull it off relatively recently. Cheating spires are dumb but decorative rooftop adornments are okay I guess. |
Quote:
https://chicago.urbanize.city/sites/...?itok=_UWurISe It lines up with this GM Today article from 2021 which stated that the John Buck Company pitched the site to JPMorgan. Suffice to say that if JPMorgan does build a new tower it will be a supertall or near supertall. https://www.gmtoday.com/business/cha...dda6db455.html |
Quote:
if you wanna clue as to what kinda building chase might occupy in chicago, look at the building that salesforce is putting their name on. If chase does anchor a new tower in chicago, i will be quite surprised if it has occupiable height above 900'. |
Quote:
|
^ Chase is HQ'd in NYC I believe
Quote:
Salesforce isn't Chase though, but you may be right. The article in the post before yours does give me a little hope though. I'm not sure if it'll end up exactly 1m SF like the article says or if they'll go for more. Salesforce's Tower in SF is 1.4m SF for reference. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
I'm assuming it's just a rumor that they're building an office tower in Chicago though, nothing concrete yet? |
Quote:
https://images.skyscrapercenter.com/...-w-cahill4.jpg Source: https://www.skyscrapercenter.com/bui...hase-tower/779 i doubt any new tower chase might occupy will be substantially taller than their current chicago home. Quote:
they'll partner with a local developer on a new office tower development and then anchor that new tower, just as BofA and BMO did. |
Quote:
Quote:
Hopefully the design is at least amazing and it isn't some blue box. |
There’s 2 lots here with W. Court Pl cutting thru the middle of the site. Hoping with a new plan we’ll see the smaller, north lot go residential/hotel >1000’ and the south lot along Washington can be your 800’ office building.
Always seemed like an odd site to combine for one fat ass tower IMO. Maybe as demand creeps up like we’re seeing, someone could see my vision thru. |
This project is still alive, and damn do the new renderings look good!
PD: https://gisapps.chicago.gov/gisimage...pds/PD1293.pdf |
Quote:
|
Very nice.
|
Nice. I like the interchanging terraces. It'll bring some variety to the loop. I kinda wish there were more of them, however then it would start to look like those Aqua copycats in Toronto.
|
Still too short. Needs to be 900 feet or taller to stand out...
|
Quote:
if this was any other city, a 700 footer would be skyline changing. But here it's just infill. Either way, hope to see this massive vacant lot bite the dust |
Quote:
The terraces do look cool though, other than that it's just a blue box. Way too many blue boxes in this area. |
Wow love the wavy terraces, this new render looks great! Hope it gets built.
|
|
Quote:
Is there any info on square footage? I didn't see any in the pdf. I'm gonna guess 1.3 million as those bottom floor plates are very bulky. I would love to see a hotel component on this site but I'll take this any day. |
730' at this location is so meh. The terraces and sky garden are cool at least, hopefully it won't be dumbed down if they find a tenant.
Still hoping JP Morgan Chase chooses this location and gives us a 900' signature Tower...one can hope. |
That big terrace is pretty cool, but the rest of it reminds me of a regular glass box apartment or condo building.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The new design looks promising, but as someone else mentioned, it looks ripe for the VE hatchet. |
The middle design was super boring, glad that's no longer a thing.
The balconies of the new one kind of remind me of something out of Singapore, they're pretty cool and I hope they remain untouched. It's sad how negative everything is surrounding development is these days. A semi decent proposal arises and the immediate (yet unfortunately realistic) reaction is that it must be too good to be true and we'll be VE'd to death. Quote:
900' is also meh and really is not much on the global stage these days, or in Chicago. |
Quote:
And yeah the top portion is incredibly boxy and boring. The bottom portion is only cool because of that cool terrace portion. And the terraces up from an office perspective aren't even practical for a lot. In one of my company's buildings in NYC, there's a big terrace on the 16th floor but we never once used it out of abundance of caution/danger. They refused any of us to step out there. |
Quote:
They'll probably put a logo on it though (which I personally wouldn't mind). |
Was there ever an impression that there would be an 800' or higher skyscraper here? From what I've seen all of the proposals from the past 10 or so years have always been around the same height.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.