TORONTO | The One | 1,077 FT / 328 M | 91 FLOORS
Address: 1 Bloor Street W.
Developer: Mizrahi Developments Architect: Foster + Partners / CORE Architects Just released renderings of 1 Bloor Street West (THE ONE). http://www.candidbling.com/B_2TTeBUwAAmbPa.jpg http://www.candidbling.com/5048-48920.jpeg |
Awesome! Our second supertall and its a Foster to boot :tup:
|
Niiiiice :cool:
|
Helloooo, beauty.
|
And the rendering doesn't include the 80 floor Holt Renfrew proposed tower across the street.
|
Are those indent things a balcony zone or not?
I hope they are... |
I would have guessed Foster or Rodgers without even reading. |
Quote:
Or are you talking about the two indents in the upper portion of the tower? I dont think Id ever venture on to a balcony over 150 meters above the ground. |
Excellent looking tower, and hopefully shovels are in the ground quickly for this one.
Quote:
|
$1-billion building: The proposal for a 80-storey T.O. tower: http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?playlistId=1.2276447
|
A drawing of "The One" is now in the diagrams: http://skyscraperpage.com/cities/?buildingID=105731
Toronto diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=12 |
Fuckn' A.
:tup: Toronto is beginning to resemble NYC with it's downtown and (emerging) midtown CBDs. |
Exemplary work again, koops.
|
that national post article is absolutely horrendous. To think that person actually gets paid to write crap like that.
|
Quote:
As for the height, Shangri La has them all the way up doesn't it? That's well past 150. |
Number One Bloor, across the street, will have balconies all the way up, to over 240 metres.
|
The renderings are stunning. My only complaint is the plain looking floor tiles. I'd also love to see a water feature in the atrium.
Fantasy: I'd love to see Mizrahi use the profits from this project to purchase another site around Bloor East and commission a more conventional Robert Stern tower (somthing around 200 meters tall) If that miraculously materialized, this would balance out the Yorkville skyline, perhaps even rivalling the Financial District. |
How about right next to it where Scotia Bank sits?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
That is Immense, Toronto's skyline is really a beast these days.
|
Quote:
And growing fast. we currently have 55 towers over 100m/ 328ft u/c not including about 20 under excavation. Compare that to places right now like Chicago with only 9 over the 100m mark or NYC with 23 it really goes to show how quickly our skyline is filling in. It's also been going at this pace for the past decade now with no real end in sight as the city is growing by 100k people each year. |
Call me a pessimist, but I find this rather unlikely, considering the amount of NIMBYs in Toronto and how "averse to density" Toronto's city council is. It seems likely that this will either be chopped down to 250-200 meters or less, or outright canceled.
|
Quote:
|
^ You never know, city council has already approved the Mirvish-Gehry supertall, so a precedent has been set. This building's location is also much better suited for a supertall than M-G, being at a major intersection on two subway lines and directly across from another 250+ tower currently U/C.
|
The extreme density proposed here will face some hurdles. Think the height should work though.
|
They can get a height of 295m at least, That is the height that was originally approved for 1 Bloor East across the street.
|
I think one of the main hurdles will be the issue of congestion. An extra 25 meters of height is a non-issue imo.
|
Agree, the primary issues regard Toronto making the adequate infrastructure investments to support the added population. Cities globally handle density levels 2-3 times higher than what we see in downtown Toronto. Buildings like theis only move us in that direction but we're hardly dense right now.
|
There are very few cities that would allow the density proposed for the site. Some of last few comments are perplexing to say the least.
I don't see the relevance in the overall density of the downtown area to this specific site either. For instance, purchasing air rights is rarely done Toronto. It's just not needed with our pro development zoning and little bit of heritage. |
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/...ticle23531447/
Toronto has finally found the confidence to act like a big city http://static.theglobeandmail.ca/fd3...web-to-gee.JPG MARCUS GEE Mar. 18 2015 Quote:
|
^ They say someone said this development will "kill birds"? What do they think birds are so stupid they'll fly right into the giant lump of steel and concrete that's right in front of their face? Or maybe the tower will grow arms and legs and start throwing rocks at the birds. This really does show the stupidity, paranoia, and thought process (or lack thereof) of NIMBYs
|
Quote:
|
Oh, we've had several birds fly into our windows and bounce off. haha And they're not the least bit reflective.
Man, this tower looks good, but what it'll do for Toronto's skyline is even better. I forget sometimes how "deep" Toronto's skyline is. This is going to look amazing on the skyline. |
This is the most attractive skyscraper to rise up in Toronto in ages. Dozens if not hundreds of cheap condos built over the last couple of decades, it would be a refreshing change to see a tall 1st class building go up instead. As to birds, well you know, pet cats kill a lot of birds. But I'm not going around calling for the banning of cats. And the mention of that 45ft height restriction took me down memory lane, what a clanger that thing was, I don't think it lasted even as long as Joe Clark's government. Which was quite short-lived.
|
Quote:
|
There has been some changes with this One;
The bad, The diagrid structural system is now gone from the building The good, The heritage facade of Hue's Kitchen is now being retained in the redesign, and the bldg. now has a new height of: 329.5 meters/1081 feet Quote:
|
1081 feet? Nice
Toronto deserves it :) |
Quote:
That said, Toronto is booming and this building is a great addition. |
The SSC database shows 75 towers U/C over 100 metres, 22 of them over 200 metres.
Toronto has 52 towers U/C over 100 metres, 8 of them over 200 metres. Toronto Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=68477791 NYC Diagram: http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=68448570 |
Yeah, that New York number is waaaaay off. Just check this list on the forum: http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=216002 or New York Yimby's awesome list: http://www.yimbyforums.com/c/new-york
What's most impressive is that we 5 supertalls going up right now with 7 more proposed and likely. |
Quote:
|
It wont be iconic at all without the diagrid. Just another modern tower.
Wouldnt mind if Mizrahi switched to Stern. |
I like the diagrid. one of the rendering's best features, IMO.
|
Quote:
|
I don't think he is a troll.
He was just responding to someone else's comment about the number of buildings under construction in Toronto compared to New York City. He was just giving references to get accurate information on buildings under construction in New York to get a better comparison to those under construction in Toronto. |
Yeah, the "troll" remark was way out of line.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.