Even though I've never been to Philly apparently, I'd like to say that it seems a bit early to demo this perfectly fine structure. I just hope they're serious about this proposal and we don't end up with a hole in the ground for years on end. But if this is really moving forward then WOW!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Boom! Love it. That means work on this tower is likely starting soon :cheers:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Patience grasshopper! But I too am excited to see this one get started. To me this one is a turning point of sorts for apartments in the City. Taller and probably more costly than any other built for rental. Plus, it's a pretty good looking design. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I believe these are the two versions we've seen.
From the CDR: Quote:
From ?: Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ugh that second version looks like a slightly elevated version of NYC public housing high rises. But I am pessimistic a developer would attempt a luxury tower without balconies. I feel like there was an interview with Dranoff when he was hyping Arthaus and one of his takeaways from his recent projects was that buyers wanted more balcony/outdoor space.
|
Quote:
What do you trust, an official submitted document with professional, high-fidelity renderings, or a website that has historically been known to post outdated info (their report every year includes projects that haven't seen movement in over 10 years) posting a 480p rendering? |
I would imagine the CDR submission is more accurate, however, I don't think we know the final design of this one since the height was increased.
|
This will block the WSFS building when walking from the park to Market St. Somehow I hadn’t realized that. What an awesome development. I despise that building.
|
Quote:
I personally like balconies from a design side, but I'm guessing they add a noticeable cost and ongoing expense if the building is going to be rental apartments. But I wouldn't be surprised if part or all of this building was designed and built with a future conversion to condos in mind. The developer can keep ownership for 10 or more years, milk the City tax and Federal depreciation for as much as possible, then sell off units as market forces dictate. I wonder if this might happen to the St. James on Washington Sq. |
|
^ Maybe they'll feel the need to go slimmer and taller like one 'o dem Central Park South twigs.
|
Here is another “construction anticipated” which to me means “we need content”. If TK don’t write it it’s not worth much to me imo.
https://phillyyimby.com/2022/09/cons...nter-city.html |
Demo permits pulled here for the non-historic parts:
https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=517109906 Address 115-17 S 19TH ST, Philadelphia, PA 19103-4905 Primary Location: 115-17 S 19TH ST, Philadelphia, PA 19103-4905 Specific Location: COMPLETE DEMOLITION OF NON-HISTORIC BUILDINGS 113-119 S. 19TH PER PLANS |
Quote:
"One of the most exciting development proposals on Philadelphia’s drawing boards is Harper Square at 113-21 South 19th Street in Rittenhouse Square, Center City. Designed by DAS Architecture and Planning and developed by Pearl Properties, the slim skyscraper is planned to rise 620 feet and 52 stories tall. The 267,874-square-foot structure will hold 215 residential units and 30,180 square feet of commercial space and incorporate existing historic buildings into the base. The development will include 30,180 square feet of commercial space at the lower floors and 183 residential units above. So far, only a preliminary approval permit had been issued, meaning that construction must await further permits to start," |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What do you get when you cross a riddle with a rhetorical question? :haha: |
It's a hobbyist blog not the Wall Street Journal. Take it easy.
|
There’s a stop work notice on the building where the st pattys pop up was. I didn’t get a chance to look at it but I think they started demo work early. I saw some guys behind cavs a couple months ago doing work. They now have wood fencing up around the old cavs.
|
Quote:
Jokes aside, I do agree "Construction Anticipated" Philly YIMBY articles are generally primo garbagio. |
:yes:
I admire his passion and ambition. He's trying to attract attention. He's trying to make a living with his passion. bunch of cats Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Stop work order on 113 S 19th in the window.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Case number CF-2022-091899 Priority STANDARD Date added Sep. 07, 2022 Date updated Sep. 07, 2022 Resolution date Not Available Violation number: VI-2022-067454 - A-301.1/6 + Code A-301.1/6 Type PARTIAL DEMOLITION Date Sep. 07, 2022 Status OPEN A-301.1/6 short description A BUILDING PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE. |
Still an overbuild?
Uh oh, this is suddenly looking like less of an overbuild per a demolition zoning permit issued September 15 for complete demo of 113-119 S 19th St, but retaining 121 S 19th; the latter is protected by designation.
From the Eclipse daily zoning report from Sep 15: ZP-2022-010409 Sep 15, 2022 115-17 S 19TH ST, Philadelphia, PA 19103-4905 113-119 S 19TH STREET LLC Complete demolition of non-historic buildings 113-119 per plans …and here’s the permit in eclipse: https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=517109906 Note that this is only the zoning permit for demo. I believe they still need a separate actual demo permit. The recently amended building permit CP-2020-006042, on the other hand, doesn’t specify demolition per se: https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=284474070 Amendment: **Amendment dated 09/12/2022: Including alterations to facades of 113-19 S 19TH ST (no work to exterior facades of 121 S 19TH ST), changing from deep foundation to mat foundation based on revised geotech report and foundation plans, changes to required special inspections and to special inspection agency (w/o change to DPRC-SI), and no other changes to previously approved work.** |
Everyone seems to have overlooked this September 16th post, including me:
Quote:
|
What is the deal with this project? Is it moving forward
|
Quote:
|
Well I saw this was issued last Friday 10/7/22. i was a bit confused and didn't know what to fully make of it. It was for 1824 Chestnut St. Maybe it will help to clear things up :shrug:
ZONING PERMIT: ZP-2022-010244 TYPE OF WORK: NEW CONSTRUCTION, ADDITION, GFA CHANGE Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=515250927 https://eclipse.phila.gov/phillylmsp...ctId=525864267 |
I know the address is slightly different, but I thought we already knew it was Cav's Rittenhouse getting demo'd.
|
The attached plans and description don’t seem to be saying the same thing weirdly.
I’m wondering if perhaps 113-119 S 19th will be getting a facadectomy while the townhouse on the corner is getting rehabbed? |
Demolition Permit Could Be First Sign of Skinny Rittenhouse Tower
Quote:
https://www.ocfrealty.com/naked-phil...tenhouse-tower |
Hey McGrath (and others of course) I just happened to look at the commercial permit that was issued back on December 14th, 2022 and I noticed a minor update and/or some movement:
Approved Scope of Work: Quote:
AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Lights have been on inside over the past month or so when passing by. Not construction light since it's not gutted, but people have definitely been in and out.
|
Demo permits are up for this one.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Demolition Permit DP-2023-000905 (Issued) Status: Issued Application Date: Jul 13, 2023 Issue Date: Oct 13, 2023 Completed Date: Expiration Date: Apr 13, 2024 We’ve known since late 2022 of the apparent pivot by Pearl Properties from the original façadist or overbuild plan to the complete demolition of 3 non-designated buildings, but this is a very disappointing outcome just the same. |
Yes, I meant the demo notices are posted on the actual buildings now. They weren’t before. Are they demolishing the entire structures or just parts of the rears as originally planned?
|
Quote:
|
EDIT: Nevermind, you're right, only the corner building is in the rittenhouse/filter historic district. I'm surprised they aren't all in it.
I guess we'll have to see. I feel like I've seen projects pull complete demo permits even if they're leaving part of the structure |
All times are GMT. The time now is 3:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.