![]() |
Quote:
It's the only way the five year time table makes sense. |
You can't even take a break around here without another supertall tower being planned.
Quote:
This is geat news, and great planning by the city. Hudson Yards is filling up faster than anticipated, and there are only a handful of developers there to work with. The City could have stood by and watched east Midtown age to irrelevance, but it didn't. And now, not only is it renewing itself, the public will get improvements in the process. |
New 70-story JPMorgan Chase tower will be the first project under Midtown East rezoning...
http://imgs.6sqft.com/wp-content/upl.../270pa-355.jpg A model of what the future 270 Park Ave building might look like via CityRealty http://www.6sqft.com/new-70-story-jp...east-rezoning/ |
Way to start off the rezoning with a bang. This is definitely good publicity for DeBlasio.
|
Not happy.
This is the first of two 600'+ International style towers (277 Park-1962) in MidTown, and as such should be respected. Keep it and do a ground-up job onthe annex. How big is the annex ft^2 wise? |
Seems like the criticism is starting already. That was quick!
= = = = = = City’s plan to demolish & replace SOM-designed 270 Park Avenue sparks criticism Quote:
https://ny.curbed.com/2018/2/21/1703...c-architecture |
So landmark it yesterday and do what you have to to the interior.
Gut and retrofit the whole damn thing if need be. Knock down the annex, build to 270P's full height (with exterior intact) and cantilever the newer structure above it. (Someone must've telepathically received the essence of my earlier post.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't see the outrage either. Of course, there would be people who complain regardless. But people also would have complained about this: https://mobile.nytimes.com/2018/02/2...ww.google.com/ Quote:
This is a better deal for the city... Quote:
|
I bet its a full demolition, start from scratch.
It's vastly more expensive and complex to try and build within the existing structure. 425 Park only went that route because they had no other choice. |
Of course these assholes want to landmark some shitty, cheap box.
|
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money...nyc/358343002/
Quote:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...15-000-workers The House That Dimon Built: JPMorgan Plans Soaring HQ in Midtown February 21, 2018 Quote:
|
Okay....
Then go sic the demo team on 277 and 245, too. I mean it. ...And FTR, not because I'm what one might call a nut-swinging fan-boy of the type of classic skyscraper architecture that seems to be finding itself increasingly unwelcome in this City, pending the fate of the first 600'+ example of it in MidTown (Isn't that worth landmarking?). It would and will be a sad day--for me; that's a cinch--if they raze this one...Or worse, all three. If is what Mayor DeBlinkero blithely gives the name "progress", I want 1095 Sixth flayed of its woefully stultified tacky-turqioise skin and re-clad as it was...with the Bell Atlantic logo on the sumbitch. They'd better seriously think about this. Sure, certain painful compromises have to be made oftentimes in ensuring a growing metropolis't transition to modernity; but let us for now at least consider what's on the table here: A full demo on a 707' structure. Surely no one here considers this a quick job. Also, let's let sink in the fact that this would be the tallest controlled demo of a skyscraper in NY since the Singer...612' and a year to do it. I haven't beem this pissed about adding to MidTown since they mulled over the deservedly ill-fated exterior overhaul to 1 Astor Plaza @1515 Broadway back in '07. "To what?", you ask? Yep. You guessed it. A fizzecking box. Oh...but a LEED Platinum box (!) furnished with all the latest amenities (!!) for today's Internet-driven business tenants blah blah blah and their clientelle!(!!!)......:no: I'm hoping fervently that the Times isn't reporting this as a fait accompli. |
Quote:
If the footprint of the future building is not yet known, that definitely points to a full tear down of the current building. I say bring it on!! |
Quote:
Personally, I dig it. It'll definitely make the view down Park Avenue more impressive than it already is. Plus this could play nicely with 1 Vanderbilt. |
I'm not happy about this, 270 and 277 are a couple of my favorites on that stretch of Park Avenue- they look like a pair of pinstriped bookends, or perhaps mates. As for 245 Park, a modern reclad could do that one some good- a modern update on what's there- perhaps bronze/copper tinted glass to replace the brown brick, and some modern terra cotta, like they're using on Steinway tower up on 57th street.
As for 277, I've read articles recently suggesting that they're doing maintenance and renovations aimed at keeping it going a good while longer. It's a beautifully maintained building. As for 1095, if I'd had my druthers, I might have given it a blend of what it had before, and what it has now- replace those white marble pinstripes with glass similar to what was used for the reclad of First Canadian Place, and swap out that that old black glass for the green. It would still have its cool pinstripe/piano keys pattern, but with a nice modern update. |
Quote:
Meanwhile, there is a very specific a serious proposal to take this one down and replace it with a larger and modern office tower that can accommodate the bank's needs under one roof. And it will be in an area of Midtown that the city is desperately trying to hold as the number one business district in the city, even as it provides room for expansion elsewhere. With all of the improvements already coming to the area, thanks to One Vanderbilt (which is really the first tower to move forward under rezoning, just a technicality) and the Eastside Access of the LIRR make this the logical place to add density. I don't hate this building, but I think the improvements (in both the new building, and area) outweigh just trying to hold on to a building just because it's old. And it Chase had decided to refurbish the building again, it would likely get a new facade like some of the other buildings are doing now anyway, so it wouldn't even look like the same building, losing the point of trying to keep it. They say this would kick off next year, so that means the approval process (a formality) would have to kick off this year to get things in place. I'm looking forward to learning and hearing more about this proposal as it moves forward. In the meantime, some Google Earth images... 1. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...DyWdcyy.g1.JPG 2. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...7UTmOUm.g2.JPG 3. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...ZiDmsKt.g3.JPG 4. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...NXO0Nix.g4.JPG 5. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...cw41bEZ.g5.JPG 6. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...sXzYsAv.g6.JPG 7. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...Qpyj4Sw.g7.JPG 8. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...2oC8GIA.g8.JPG 9. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...xmi0h7B.g9.JPG 10. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...8en9tA.g10.JPG 11. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...pgc4B0.g11.JPG 12. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...C20Q0c.g12.JPG 13. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...OmKWSB.g13.JPG 14. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...XFcMiu.g14.JPG 15. http://a4.pbase.com/o10/06/102706/1/...TNvR2Y.g15.JPG |
https://www.businesswire.com/news/ho...n-NYC-Mayor-de
JPMorgan Chase CEO Dimon and NYC Mayor de Blasio Announce New, State-of-the-Art JPMorgan Chase Headquarters to Rise at 270 Park Ave Company Will Collaborate Closely with Other Key Government Officials, Including New York City Council and Governor’s Office, to Quickly Move Process Forward February 21, 2018 Quote:
https://nypost.com/2018/02/21/jpmorg...ry-skyscraper/ Quote:
|
The first of many to come in Midtown East!
|
This will fit right in.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.