|
And here's a peek inside the Alexandria Hotel on Feb. 3rd, 1915.
http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/924/qxVRos.jpg http://www.ebay.com/itm/Org-PHOTO-19...wAAOSwPc9W14B~ Here's that same room in 2008. -note how the pediments have changed over the doorways. (and faux 'balconies' added) for search purposes: Third Annual Banquet of Old Guardsmen of the Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corporation Alexandria Hotel, Feb. 3, 1915 _ supposedly there's a X marking one of the men. (this was written on the back) http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/640...923/IST0q3.jpg detail *the seller says 'papa' is written by the man as well, but I haven't been able to find the man yet. (are my eyes going? :() __ |
Quote:
Paul C. Koehler |
Quote:
Paul C. Koehler |
Quote:
Paul C. Koehler |
Worst Company in America?
Quote:
The image below is from my Photobucket account page. As you can see, after posting at NLA and elsewhere for 5 years I'm at 1% of storage. My current subscription ($30 a year) runs through September. However, after that, if I want to use Photobucket for image hosting, I'll have to pay $399.99 -- a 1,233% increase! And given Photobucket's past reliability problems, I wouldn't be surprised if people who pay the extra $ end up having to relink all their images anyway. http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...g.jpg~original FW image |
Quote:
|
Mrs. Watson and the Girls' Home
Quote:
Mrs. Helen A. Watson was the LAPD's first Matron. I know Lucy Gray is said to have been appointed the first LAPD Matron in 1888, but that is not correct. Mrs. Watson was appointed Matron to support her work with young girls (and boys, too). The reasoning was, if it weren't for Mrs. Watson, the police would end up dealing with many of the girls and boys, either because they had become criminals, or they had become victims of crime. The Girls' Home, mentioned in the article you quoted about the baseball game, opened in temporary quarters at 11th and Myrtle (now Wall) on July 6, 1887 (a Times article on July 2 explained that Mrs. Watson needed to rent a home now, rather than wait to find a place to buy): http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psg9jvsnwk.jpg July 7, 1887, Los Angeles Herald at CDNC Mrs. Watson shared your distaste for the term "stray girls," e_r, though only as it applied to the girls under her care: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psyl1dftry.jpg July 12, 1887, Los Angeles Herald at CDNC The permanent location for the Girls' Home turned out to be 13 Fuller Street: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psj3ljzstl.jpg November 12, 1887, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL Here's the Girls' Home in the 1891 LACD at 2150 Glowner: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psrqwk7mbp.jpg fold3.com That's not because the home moved, it's because Fuller became Glowner: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...ps0t82odem.jpg February 6, 1889, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL The site of 2150 Glowner is marked by a blue dot: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...i.jpg~original October 1, 1895, Grider and Dow Map, 249513 at Huntington Digital Library Eventually 2150 Glowner was renumbered and renamed 2230 Wall. It's been replaced by an apartment building: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...8.jpg~original Jan 2017 GSV In late 1897, the Girls' Home sort of dissolved, and the Los Angeles Boys and Girls Aid Society (not Home Society) apparently took over the assets of the Girls' Home (Lot 13 is 13 Fuller/2150 Glowner): http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psxwkwsf9p.jpg December 15, 1897, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL In 1898, the Boys and Girls Aid Society built an orphanage at Mission and Orange Grove in South Pasadena, now the site of Orange Grove Park. That facility was condemned in 1925, and the following year the current facility opened in Altadena. It's called Five Acres, and it traces its origins back to the founding of the Los Angeles Boys and Girls Aid Society in 1888 -- by, among others, Mrs. Watson: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...ps7sffton1.jpg May 22, 1888, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL Oh yeah, about the Matron thing . . . on August 1, 1888, the LA Police Commission appointed Mrs. Helen A. Watson as the LAPD's first Matron (she was "H. A." not "M. A."): http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...pswehewbxx.jpg August 2, 1888, Los Angeles Herald at CDNC http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psmomklucf.jpg August 2, 1888, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL However, Mrs. Watson was interested in helping children, not in searching or attending to women brought to the jail: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...pssxfavbrg.jpg August 30, 1888, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL There was continued opposition to the idea of a Police Matron, Mrs. Watson was not performing all the duties expected of her, and some of the things she did seem to have rubbed some people the wrong way. As a result, the Police Commission voted to eliminate the position of Police Matron on January 9, 1889 ("His Honor" is Mayor John Bryson): http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...pswakphbki.jpg January 10, 1889, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL Mrs. Watson wanted her job back: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psmoarmmzo.jpg April 25, 1889, Los Angeles Herald at CDNC But when the Police Matron position was reestablished, it went to Lucy Gray: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psjbegptkv.jpg July 11, 1889, Los Angeles Herald at CDNC Mrs. Watson, who lived at 6 Sand (just east of Fort/Broadway) then 920 Bartlett (I think that's now part of the Harbor Freeway, just north of Sunset), eventually moved to somewhere in Colegrove, where she died in 1899: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psvjobowkj.jpg http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...psbceqg9oo.jpg September 12, 1899, Los Angeles Times at ProQuest via LAPL |
Quote:
Still trying to find this house...or is it a school or some other kind of institution? Now there is an additional clue-- the address on the right-side gatepost, seen in the picture below. The number is "320X" with the letters "CO"-something centered above. It may just be a house, but there appears to be a large wing to the right and whatever that is to the left.... Here are more s/s's: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/qQ...Q=w986-h648-no https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/n2...Q=w696-h529-no ...and from the porch toward the gate... https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/ax...g=w685-h522-no |
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a 28 or 29 Ford AA Express Pickup, not a 1930. Paul C. Koehler |
Quote:
Paul C. Koehler |
I think this was answered before, but it is a demonstration of a breeches buoy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breeches_buoy Crude, but effective. Cheers, Earl |
Quote:
Paul C. Koehler |
Quote:
This is going to be devastating. Photobucket Just Broke Billions of Photos Across the Web by Will Nicholls / JUL 01, 2017 https://petapixel.com/2017/07/01/pho...-embedded-web/ Since 2003, the popular photo hosting service Photobucket has been letting users upload and host images for free on their servers. They have over 10 billion images stored by 100 million registered users. But now they’re going to start charging, and that means billions of images around the Web are now broken. It would have been nice instead if users were asked to pay for any future 3rd party hosting or hot linking as this sudden policy will leave countless sites with unlinked photographs. And no warning. Photobucket allowed hotlinking photos uploaded to and stored on its servers for a long time. This was their business model, and they made money from ads on their own site, which users would be exposed to when they went to upload content. Unfortunately for Photobucket users, without warning, things just changed. Now the service is rolling out a $399 per year subscription fee for those who want to hotlink images from Photobucket’s servers to display elsewhere. That means that billions of images across the Web now display an error message instead of the image in question. The move has sparked fury from users, who have relied on the service for years and now feel “blackmailed” into paying the subscription fee. Or as the headline from another article says: Photobucket Says Photo-f**k-it, Starts Off-Site Image Shakedown Can Photobucket be sued? It's one thing to start a new policy, but to start one that affects up to 14 years of understanding with a company...that seems just wrong. |
Nazimova residence
Quote:
This undated image of Hayvenhurst seems to show the same view as the color postcard, but back a few feet: http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...h.jpg~original Islandora (link not always available) What's that on top . . . two dragonflies mating? http://i1165.photobucket.com/albums/...k.jpg~original |
I'll have to continue with Photobucket for now as the thought of moving 8,000+ images and editing 3,000+ NLA posts to update the image links is too much to comprehend at the moment. There's no way I'm paying $399/year, so I'm open to suggestions for an alternative. I have no problem paying a small annual fee, but raising the rate by over 1000% is just plain disgusting. What's even worse is that I normally suggest members use an image host so they have control over their images!
--------------- I think that today's Julius Shulman post shows an office building. There's no sign of manufacturing or storage. It's "Job 1655: Jones and Emmons, Klein-Norton Co. Building, 1954". http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...1.jpg~original This was the better of the two end shots, although the other shows a "KLEIN-NORTON CO" sign under the windows. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...2.jpg~original This is obviously just inside the entrance, but I'm not sure if it's a waiting room or casual meeting area. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...3.jpg~original A little further in we get to see the reception area. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...4.jpg~original The final shot shows one of the fancier offices, which seems to come with an indoor garden. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...5.jpg~original All from Getty Research Institute The Klein-Norton Co was apparently in the clothes manufacturing business. From an article about the Klein family at earthlink.net: The company was on Ninth and Los Angeles Streets in the garment district of downtown Los Angeles. In perhaps the 1950s, it moved to Culver City (suburban Los Angeles). It was run mostly run by the Nortons until 1940, then by Vice President and General Manager Stephen F. Nordlinger (whose father had married Mamie Norton's sister Esther) from 1940 through his retirement in 1969 and then by his son, Stephen. The company was sold to non-family managers who moved it to Santa Ana, Orange County, about 1980.The move in the 1950s must have been to the building above. It's still standing at 4200 Sepulveda Boulevard, Culver City. http://i809.photobucket.com/albums/z...6.jpg~original GSV |
:previous:
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/tf...A=w511-h648-noHistoric Los Angeles More on the family and the business here |
Quote:
Thanks a load Ed |
Quote:
Start from the South end, and follow the lead that goes diagonally through the yard. The tracks to the West of the double slip switches would be the "Cornfield" and the tracks to the East would be the "Links". The clean out tracks were close to North Broadway at the Chinatown end, and the tracks at the north end before you go under North Broadway was the Bullring. The "Cornfield was named as that where grain cars were spotted for inspection by the Federal Grain Inspectors. The Bullring was where stock was rested when needed, stock pend were gone by the early fifties. As you know once something gets a name on the railroad it stays even if it no longer applies. Paul C. Koehler |
Happy Birthday E_R!
http://www.lamag.com/wp-content/uplo...2011/06/53.jpg The Los Angeles cake designed by Richard Ruskell For additional amusement: 8 Los Angeles Landmarks Rendered in Cake https://la.curbed.com/2014/4/21/1011...ndered-in-cake |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:14 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.