Quote:
|
No idea when they will start. It’s probably a funding snafu. The Fulton Market Association was in favor of the station but didn’t want all $70M of the project cost to come from the Kinzie TIF district... they want CTA to get free money from the Federal government instead. Apparently they think the Trump administration is sitting on giant piles of transit cash, just itching to hand it out. LOL
|
What the status of the Cta Green Line Damen Lake street stop
|
On a different topic... While I appreciate the large-scale electrical, track, signal, station and other replacements/expansions/improvements all along the length of the Blue Line from O'Hare through to Downtown, the weekend delays have been absolutely absurd as of late! My normal 25 minute train trip from Belmont to Clinton and vice-versa took nearly 45 minutes because of the single-track section between Clark/Lake and Damen. This morning was roughly the same. Wouldn't one think that CTA would try to schedule trains at intervals which don't involve one train sitting for a very long period of time while one or two trains traverse the stretch in the opposite direction?
Ah well, first-world problems, I guess. :shrug: Aaron (Glowrock) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I didn't realize Chicago had actually created a guide for Transit Oriented Development here in the Chicago. Nice to see it.
|
Block Club has a nice update on flyover construction. Even has a bit of construction fundamentals (70 ft piers) you don't always see.
Quote:
|
If I'm not mistaken, these are the same caissons we see for highrise construction... so we do "always see them" on this forum, lol.
I appreciate getting info from Block Club on this kind of stuff, but I feel like the constant and intensive coverage really makes this work seem like they're building the Great Pyramid or something. In any Asian city, this kind of project would be very minor! And certainly on the private side, companies like Case and Revcon do this kind of foundation all day nonstop for developers. It's a pretty standard technique. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Related chopped 10 stories off the proposed Equinox Hotel (down to 48 stories), but in transit news it seems like Burnett is pushing for the reconstruction of the Halsted L station given the development activity in the area. I think there are higher priority infill stations, but it’d be awesome to get this one back. The spacing on this segment of the Green/Pink Lines would be tight, but there’s a lot going on. 90/94 just east of Halsted eats a decent amount of the service area, but we’ll survive.
Hopefully the push wests continues and we can get a Pink Line stop at Madison in addition to a Brown/Purple Lines stop at Halsted and Division, and that Green Line stop at Damen that’s allegedly under construction... |
Quote:
As you say there are higher priorities for new infill stops. |
Quote:
Still, glad to see Burnett pushing for CTA to solve the traffic problems in the West Loop area instead of more parking. Not that Burnett has any real leverage over CTA, though. |
Quote:
|
I think the Halsted Green Line is a great idea. The area is going to need some significant transit improvements, considering the expansion of the downtown zoning a few years ago. A stop at Halsted likely wouldn't open until the later part of the 2020s at the earliest, so I think it's entirely reasonable to assume demand will be higher whenever it does open.
The Green Line could do with a few more infill stops also. Western, Elizabeth, 26th would all be very helpful in improving downtown connections. 63/Racine could be reopened relatively easily, and perhaps some other demolished stations could be rebuilt, maybe in tandem with a re-extension along 63rd to University or Stony Island. |
Quote:
Edit: Looks like the Brown/Purple section of the bypass will be finished in 2021, Red/Purple tracks a few blocks north are being reconstructed between 2021-2024. Hopefully that means new stations after 2021 |
I was looking at CTA Rail Ridership stats for full year 2018 (the last year we have full stats for), and noticed that the official full year total for rail ridership was around 225 million riders. But if I go through the line items and add up total yearly ridership for each line, it sums up to 186.3 million.
Can anyone here explain that discrepancy? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.