SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   City Discussions (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=24)
-   -   How Is Covid-19 Impacting Life in Your City? (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=242036)

dave8721 Sep 24, 2020 4:30 AM

I dont know how true it is but I have heard that planes are "relatively" safe, or at least safer than you would expect an air tight box that you are trapped in close quarters in for hours at a time. They generally have air filtration systems that are constantly sterilizing the air before cycling it back into the cabin or else they would be germ factories in normal times as well. Of course plane travel also involves close quarters indoor security lines and such which are not well ventilated. The actual flight part is probably safer than a bus or train ride.

Pedestrian Sep 24, 2020 7:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dave8721 (Post 9051892)
I dont know how true it is but I have heard that planes are "relatively" safe, or at least safer than you would expect an air tight box that you are trapped in close quarters in for hours at a time. They generally have air filtration systems that are constantly sterilizing the air before cycling it back into the cabin or else they would be germ factories in normal times as well. Of course plane travel also involves close quarters indoor security lines and such which are not well ventilated. The actual flight part is probably safer than a bus or train ride.

I believe that's true but it's like saying you're safer in a tornado than in a hurricane because the hurricane lasts longer.

Being in a closed box for hours, even with regularly changed air, is not terribly safe and it depends somewhat on where you are sitting. I don't believe the air in planes is "sterilized" (although I've read talk of trying to do that with UV light). It's just changed constantly with the cabin air replaced by outside air.

The problem is that there are two kinds of emissions from your fellow humans that are problematic: Droplets and aerosols.

Droplets are larger bits of spittle we spray when we talk, yell, sneeze or cough. They don't travel terribly far though perhaps as far as 12 ft in some cases, then generally fall on surfaces. If they contain virus, it may live on those surfaces for days. Changing the air in the plane probably doesn't effect this much because the droplets fall out of the air so quickly but they can infact you if they hit you (hence why mask wearing is good) or if you touch where they've fallen and then touch your nose, mouth, eyes etc.

Aerosols are smaller particles--think something like the cloud of vapor expelled by someone "vaping" nicotine. These stay in the air for a long time and will be sucked out of the plane cabin by the ventillation system after a few minutes although there may be stagnant pockets of air where they remain, like eddies in a stream. That's why they say you are better off in a window seat with the air vent on full blowing at you. Masks, incidentally, are less helpful against aerosols.

Actually, take a good look at where the vapor cloud goes when this guy vapes in his video and imagine you were standing 6 or 8 ft away. Coronavirus goes about the same distance.

Video Link

CaliNative Sep 24, 2020 9:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9051802)
I'm beginning to think that's true of the entire world. The relatively low density, low physically connected places have had the least trouble. If the population is low and the sophistication relatively high so that contact tracing and testing are feasible, that helps a lot too. In some cases it may have been dumb luck--for example the fact that this disease struck in late winter when Sweden, for example, probably doesn't have a lot of tourists.

Things like masks and distancing probably do reduce transmission substantially but that "flattens the curve" without shrinking the area under it. Without a vaccine, we'd eventually all get infected (well, most of us). Delaying that does have advantages, though, because aside from the vaccine, some more effective treatments such as monoclonal antibodies are probably coming online.

Viral load matters. The viruses are everywhere. Is it possible that if we breath in a few viruses our immune system can mount a defense and we can develop immunity gradually? On the other hand if we are unfortunate to be in a place or room with a few infected people nearby we get a much higher viral load that can overwhelm our immune system and make us very sick? In other words, can we acquire immunity by being exposed to a low viral load over a period of time?

CaliNative Sep 24, 2020 9:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil McAvity (Post 9051669)
What's Covid-19?

CO(rona) VI(rus) D(isease)-(20)19

CaliNative Sep 24, 2020 9:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phil McAvity (Post 9051669)
What's Covid-19?

Quote:

Originally Posted by iheartthed (Post 9051832)
I would feel a lot better about flying before a vaccine if they're able to do this. This pandemic is the longest I've gone without getting on a plane in 10+ years, but I've pretty much ruled flying out until there is a vaccine.

I'd rather get on a plane with some social distancing and people wearing masks than go to an indoor bar or restaurant or political rally with few people wearing masks. But mostly I avoid people and assume that every person might have it, even people you know. Becoming a hermit until the angel of death passes over.

SteveD Sep 24, 2020 2:04 PM

I've traveled by air twice since April and I'm about to do it again this morning.

Airport and airlines are bending over backwards on the side of caution and I feel MUCH safer in airports and on a plane than I do, say, going to my local Kroger.

iheartthed Sep 24, 2020 2:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliNative (Post 9051948)

I'd rather get on a plane with some social distancing and people wearing masks than go to an indoor bar or restaurant or political rally with few people wearing masks. But mostly I avoid people and assume that every person might have it, even people you know. Becoming a hermit until the angel of death passes over.

Yeah, I'm not doing any of that either. But, if a restaurant or bar is too crowded you have the option to leave. You can't really control who gets on a plane, and once you're on it you can't remove yourself if you get the feeling that you're too close to someone that shouldn't be flying.

iheartthed Sep 25, 2020 6:31 PM

We knew it was coming:

Quote:

NYC to extend popular outdoor dining program permanently: de Blasio

The city’s COVID-era outdoor dining initiative, which allows restaurants to use sidewalk and street space to serve customers, will become permanent, Mayor de Blasio announced Friday.

“We will make the Open Restaurants initiative, permanent — and year-round,” de Blasio said on the Brian Lehrer show. “This has been, I think, an extraordinarily positive experiment, and it’s worked.”

The Open Restaurants program allows restaurants to use sidewalks and street space, primarily parking spots, to serve diners eating outdoors. Despite its popularity — more than 10,000 restaurants are now participating in the program — its long-term fate had become uncertain in recent weeks as temperatures began to dip and with winter on the horizon.

"We hope — I believe — this is going to make it a lot easier for restaurants to survive,” de Blasio said, estimating that the program has saved nearly 100,000 jobs.

His announcement comes as the city braces for indoor dining to resume next week. That plan will allow restaurants to operate at 25% capacity, a number that prompted many restaurant owners to point out that it will not be enough for them to survive and to call for outdoor dining in the colder months.

De Blasio said he wants restaurants to provide heating for outdoor diners in the winter and that restaurants would also be able to enclose outdoor spaces, but such enclosures would be subject to the 25% limit on customers.

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...bmu-story.html
This was probably close to a no-brainer. NYC has felt a lot more European with the street closures and massive amounts of outdoor seating space, and there have been few complaints so far. The pandemic basically implemented the pipe dream plan to close lower Manhattan to cars, and did so over a much wider geographic area.

Crawford Sep 25, 2020 6:35 PM

This has been one of the few bright spots of the pandemic. The expanded outdoor dining and closed streets have worked surprisingly well. And yeah, year-round is a no-brainer.

All that's lost is some on-street parking, which shouldn't be allowed in prime areas anyways. Manhattan didn't even allow on-street parking until around 1960 or something.

sopas ej Sep 25, 2020 6:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 9053753)
This has been one of the few bright spots of the pandemic. The expanded outdoor dining and closed streets have worked surprisingly well.

It's worked here in LA as well; Mayor Garcetti of LA last month extended the "Al Fresco Program" until the end of the year; it had been set to expire August 31st.

It has certainly made the streets appear to be more vibrant, but it's kind of a Potemkin affect, being that the restaurants inside are completely empty of customers.

LA21st Sep 25, 2020 6:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sopas ej (Post 9053762)
It's worked here in LA as well; Mayor Garcetti of LA last month extended the "Al Fresco Program" until the end of the year; it had been set to expire August 31st.

It has certainly made the streets appear to be more vibrant, but it's kind of a Potemkin affect, being that the restaurants inside are completely empty of customers.

I think its going to be permanent for LA. The weather, people love it etc.

JManc Sep 25, 2020 7:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 9053753)
This has been one of the few bright spots of the pandemic. The expanded outdoor dining and closed streets have worked surprisingly well. And yeah, year-round is a no-brainer.

All that's lost is some on-street parking, which shouldn't be allowed in prime areas anyways. Manhattan didn't even allow on-street parking until around 1960 or something.

Year-round...in new york?

Crawford Sep 25, 2020 7:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JManc (Post 9053784)
Year-round...in new york?

You can use propane heat lamps, and igloo-like clear enclosures. It's already done in other cold-weather cities.

JManc Sep 25, 2020 7:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crawford (Post 9053795)
You can use propane heat lamps, and igloo-like clear enclosures. It's already done in other cold-weather cities.

Ok, that makes sense, I've seen the plastic enclosures on deck/ patio seating in colder climates in the winter.

Pedestrian Sep 25, 2020 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveD (Post 9052073)
I've traveled by air twice since April and I'm about to do it again this morning.

Airport and airlines are bending over backwards on the side of caution and I feel MUCH safer in airports and on a plane than I do, say, going to my local Kroger.

They want you to feel safer but really, aside from leaving empty seats to facilitate distancing--which some are doing and some are not--they haven't really done much.

As I've already posted though, something truly useful is now coming onstream: Pre-flight coronavirus testing. In Europe Alitalia and Lufthansa are using 15-minute tests administered to everyone pre-flight.

In the US, this is new:

Quote:

United Launches COVID-19 Testing for Passengers Out of SFO
By NBC Bay Area staff • Published September 24, 2020 • Updated on September 24, 2020 at 5:31 pm

United Airlines on Thursday announced it will be the first U.S. airline to launch a COVID-19 testing program for travelers, and it’s starting with passengers at San Francisco International Airport next month.

Starting on Oct. 15, customers traveling on United from SFO to Hawaii will have the option to take a rapid test at the airport or a self-collected, mail-in test ahead of their trip, the airline said in a news release.

The rapid Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 test, administered by GoHealth Urgent Care and their partner Dignity Health, provides results in about 15 minutes, United said. The tests will be available to United customers on the same day as their flight departing from SFO.

The mail-in test option will be administered by Color, and United recommends travelers test at least 10 days before their departure date and provide their sample within 72 hours of that date.

The airline along with Hawaii officials ensure that any United customer who tests negative, whether they're visitors or Hawaiian residents returning home, will not be subjected to the state's 14-day quarantine requirement, the airline said.
https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/loca...f-sfo/2369064/

I really think the 15 minutes test just prior to boarding should be the standard and used on all flights until vaccination becomes commonplace at which time people could exempt themselves from testing by showing proof of vaccination (the old yellow international immunization cards would work).

If they did that, even I might consider getting on a plane.

Pedestrian Sep 25, 2020 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JManc (Post 9053784)
Year-round...in new york?

The waiters will skim the ice off your drinks for free.

Actually, though, I've been wondering if we are going to see a reverse effect in the Southwest where the weather in summer has been to hot to sit outdoors but in winter it can be perfect.

Acajack Sep 26, 2020 2:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JManc (Post 9053784)
Year-round...in new york?

Hey they are going to allow outdoor restaurant and bar patios to stay open this winter in Ottawa!

homebucket Sep 26, 2020 3:09 AM

https://hauteliving.com/wp-content/u...74_4286311.jpg

Quote:

Equinox Opens Its First Fully-Outdoor Gym In Los Angeles
CITY GUIDE, NEWSSeptember 21, 2020by Laura Schreffler

Innovation and out-of-the-box thinking is definitely something necessary during this time, which is why we aren’t at all surprised that Equinox, a leader among fitness clubs, has decided to open their first fully-outdoor facility. It happens to be in Los Angeles, which has beautiful weather year round, which isn’t the case for other destinations such as Manhattan or London, but here, it works.
https://hauteliving.com/2020/09/equi...e=morning_brew

araman0 Sep 26, 2020 3:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pedestrian (Post 9054066)

I really think the 15 minutes test just prior to boarding should be the standard and used on all flights until vaccination becomes commonplace at which time people could exempt themselves from testing by showing proof of vaccination (the old yellow international immunization cards would work).

If they did that, even I might consider getting on a plane.

Imagine the embarrassment if someone tests positive right before getting on a flight. Suddenly people in hazmat suits would come and escort them away in front of the whole airport.

Still a great idea though if they can produce enough copies of the testing kits for everyone.

Pedestrian Sep 26, 2020 5:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by araman0 (Post 9054278)
Imagine the embarrassment if someone tests positive right before getting on a flight. Suddenly people in hazmat suits would come and escort them away in front of the whole airport.

Still a great idea though if they can produce enough copies of the testing kits for everyone.

If somebody tested positive they would just be denied boarding. Much worse would be having one or more such people on the plane. Anybody who wants to be spared this “embarrassment” could, of course, get their own test a few days before travelling and cancel their flight if positive.


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.