![]() |
I'm so f'n down with a casino in this building. If done right, it would only take one floor, and likely be so much better than the POS rivers casino. It would attract tourists like crazy, a little bit of riff raff, but mostly people with money who are either living in the city or visiting the city. The rest of the building could be used for office space, and the idea of creating a transit center of some kind is awesome. Point being, there are many possibilities for this building, and the increased amenities on the southern canal corridor as well as incoming residential development in the south loop makes this more viable than ever for redevelopment. I'm optimistic
|
All of this casino talk is pointless. It isn't going to happen. We know what is going to happen, the new owner has told us. It isn't a casino.
|
An art deco casino is like something out of the movies.
|
With some real forward movement with the OPO over the last few days it really does shape up a wild month. Finally real plans for the old Cook County Hospital. Imminent starts for Wanda, Riverline, and WP East. Finally some activity to speak of at dormant sites at Nordstroms and old Rezko river lot. An imminent design decision and location likely coming on the Obama library and Lucas possibly moving.
What other major news am I msising I can't think of. What a month or so. |
I will put my prediction down, McDonalds Chicago HQ will here. We could hear an announcement of their intentions to move downtown in the summer
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I doubt any large company would make it it's HQ. It would be best as something similar to Merchandise Mart, many many tenants of different sizes. Granted it will take twenty years for it to be like MM (it will take quite a while to fill that much space with smaller tenants) and it wouldn't likely have an industry of one type (even MM isn't that so much anymore).
Having more tenants of smaller sizes would make the building more stable financially long term and keep occupancy up. MM has never really had major problems with un-rented space, which older buildings can have. Having a large company make its HQ there would be flashy, but they would never stay long, and then you got a huge empty space again. Face it, large corporations still prefer new construction for HQ's. The old Post Office would be great space for back office operations, company data centers, startups, call centers and small tech firms. Yeah, nothing flashy, but it would make for a profitable building. And it would fill it, and keep it mostly full. |
Let's not overestimate how much of the Mart is tech—or office space of any kind. Without CoStar access, I'll guesstimate somewhere around 250,000 square feet is any kind of office space.
The old post office is 10 times that. |
Quote:
I worked for a company there which had an entire lower floor. If there are 18 floors, not counting the tower, that's about 200,000 square feet per floor. And that was one firm - a tech firm - and that was 10 years ago. The amount of tech in the Mart has only grown since then. 1871 alone takes up 115,000 square feet, too. That's eclipsing your 250,000 number with just *2* firms - CCCIS and 1871. And then thre's GoHealth and Moto Mobility Yelp and others. And isn't ConAgra locating there? That's not a tech firm, but it is a 200,000 square foot office lease. It's easy to forget that the Mart has 4 million square feet just in the original building and over 2 million more in the Apparel Mart. I'm sure that office uses presently account for over a million square feet of space, perhaps more, and that a decent chunk of that is tech firms. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
1871 has 41,000 RSF ConAgra has 168,000 RSF Brain Tree has 58,000 RSF Yelp has 60,000 RSF GoHealth has 90,000 RSF CTU has 48,000 RSF Motorola Mobilty has 604,000 RSF (200,000 SF of that they have up for sublease in which VelocityEHS takes 91,000 RSF) Plus Discovery Chicago, MSL Group and Razorfish all have large leases too. Those are just to name a few and the building has an additional 243,864 SF available for lease |
Quote:
|
Quote:
From what I've heard in my company there aren't any large blocks of floorspace available in Sears (we were looking since my company is doubling our workforce in the Tower). |
Quote:
|
Speculation time....I wonder what gym brand they have in mind or even locked up. From the sound of it it seems like a major component of the plan. I would love for it to be East Bank Club. I've read that the upkeep on their River North property is very expensive and I'm sure they could sell that lot for an ungodly price that could hold a number of condo/apartment towers once the building was scrapped. Or maybe Lifetime Fitness would decide its a perfect location to finally go urban.
- Also I wonder what is in mind for the south east lot where the annex building is. It would have near perfect north views of the South Branch. It would provide a great bookend similar to River Point, Wolf Point, and Trump. Maybe they will not invest too heavily into the landscaping if there is any idea for a highrise (or supertall) in mind for the lot. |
http://www.chicagotribune.com/busine...517-story.html
The saga continues. Apparently Davies was dead for five days before the deal closed and his death was reported about 24 hours prior to the closing. |
Quote:
I think East Bank Club is unlikely, as it was/is founded by the owner of Habitat partly to boost the value of their land holdings in western River North. If they moved the club, it would have a negative impact on Habitat's rental properties. Quote:
|
Quote:
I think it would be great to see something developed there eventually (maybe a business cycle or two down the road), and would not want to see anything done that ruled that out. But on the other hand, I think the Old Post Office itself should be the current focus, and I'm pretty happy with what they've shown so far in their renderings. There's not much point distracting from the business at hand with talk of a tower that might or might not happen a decade or more from now. One thing that occurs to me is that when the Post Office and Riverline are done, we'll have a river side pedestrian path all the way from Roosevelt up past the confluence. Assuming River City is integrated into Riverline's riverwalk, the only gap will be the block north of the Post Office next to 300 N Riverside. It would behoove 300 N Riverside's owners, the city, and that block's neighbors on the river plaza to work together to make sure that final gap is bridged. |
Quote:
|
this whole thing is just bizaree
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If "power of attorney" was shorthand for what was actually something set up in trust form then it may not matter. Some trusts survive death. There's probably not enough public details about exactly how everything was structured for anyone to make a truly educated guess as to how this will play out but I suspect we'll find out within a month or so whether there will be any disputes. |
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/c...20-column.html
New plan for old post office has better chance of delivering than past flops May 20, 2016 Quote:
|
^whatever, Kamin is still and always will be a tool... idiot! Sad.
|
Quote:
|
The ChicagoDPD twitter account shared a couple more pictures from 601W:
http://i.imgur.com/KvlYs92.png http://i.imgur.com/FrzGBBc.png |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/cou...n-post-office/
Quote:
|
From the rendering it looks like the lane on the north side of the bridge doesn't continue through the building, or is drastically reduced.
|
^Just an illusion with the way the sound wall is curved.
|
It does seem as if the pedestrian walkways to the north and south of the Congress tunnel will be restored, though, and a connection under Congress next to the river.
Sadly it doesn't sound like there is some awesome Chelsea Market-style destination planned for the building, but I'll be glad if they improve the way the building interfaces with its surroundings. |
|
Quote:
Given that Gensler is the architect, I'm sure they will find all sorts of great ways to improve the property, hopefully there is something in the budget for doing something creative to the horrendous way Canal is currently treated. Also, if my suggestion were implemented, it would generate a huge amount of street facing retail space along the base which would probably provide a significant windfall to the owners since ground floor office doesn't rent for nearly as much as upper floors and retail tends to rent for more than office to begin with. |
I'm dreaming about the evenings when this building is all lit up at night. Rejoice!
|
Yes indeed. It will be very impressive, especially driving in from the west.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They could certainly landscape that area better however, maybe ramp it up and over the Eisenhower and then back down. You could do something really graceful and minimal like the Art Institute's pedestrian bridge, but with seating and plantings so it feels like a linear park. Originally there would have been a pretty cool westward vista down the expressway, but now I think it'll be blocked by the new upper-level ramp at the Circle. |
I wonder if the [Sterling Bay] redevelopment of the Union Station garage will have any effect on the Post Office redevelopment, being right across the street.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Or, the question might be "I wonder if the Post Office redevelopment will impact/boost any development potential over at Union Station?" They're both only proposed projects at this stage - actually, 601 W Cos already owns its site, while Sterling Bay very much does not right now..... |
Sounds like the first renovation permit has come through. :cheers:
http://chicago.curbed.com/2016/10/6/...ovation-begins |
|
Cmon guys, this is worth a :banana:
|
Well that was fast, amazing what happens when you don't have a total schmuck owning the building. They do deserve a banana for this!
:dancing: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.