![]() |
I so agree:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now, here is my question/concern: During a bad flu season, we do nothing different. No masks, social distancing, restrictions, etc. So at what point, or how bad does a flu season have to be to make us do those things? I ask this because let's say Covid goes to r=1.4? Its worse than the flu, but as I said, we never did anything different for the flu, so why are we only going to declare mission accomplished when we get to flu levels, why not slightly higher than flu levels? I hope that point/question makes sense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The current vaccine is less than 100% effective against existing mutations of the virus and at any point in time, anywhere on the planet, a new mutation could pop up that's almost 100% resistant to the vaccine and even the vaccinated could be exposed to it unknowingly. So what makes sense to me is to continue with "layered" protection. Sure, get vaccinated, but also do the other things that are really no big inconvenience or bother. At the same time, go ahead and do the things that really matter to you such as travel. And as a society, once most of us are vaccinated (or those who refuse to get vaccinated get infected and either die or recover with immunity), we can return the economy to a normal status, allowing however for those of us who want to remain careful to do so. I, for example, expect from now on I will ALWAYS wear a KN95 mask on public transit or in indoor crowds. At the very least, I'll get fewer colds. |
Quote:
COVID has a ~5-10 greater hospitalization rate than the flu, and hospitals are often somewhat burdened during flu season (in fact, probably the size of the burden during flu season sets hospital capacities, to some extent). A sustained r=1.4 COVID every year probably overwhelms hospitals with patients after a few months, but maybe not. Depends on length of stay and stuff like that. It's probably better for everyone just to get vaccinated every year, if necessary. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As you know, I'm sure, the flu virus is less stable than coronavirus and exists in a greater number of varieties such that mutations are regularly occurring and almost impossible to suppress. Hence the need for a new vaccine every year (the vaccine offered in the northern hemisphere is usually based on the latest mutations and prevalent varieties of virus found that northern summer (southern winter) in the Southern Hemisphere. But such a pattern of regularly occurring mutations isn't likely in coronavirus, especially if vaccination is widespread even in poorer countries. |
Quote:
I know, I've been offering it for years, and lots of people say no. And those are just the people who see the doctor. Influenza vaccination has never been a prerequisite for normal life, like, ever.... But yes, among the elderly COVID is far more deadly, I'm aware of this |
Quote:
If Covid had the same death rate as the flu, we could deal with a higher r rate. However, since it is a lot more deadly, an r rate of 1 is basically the floor to judge when we are "good to go"? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's a matter of swapping out the mRNA for the latest variant, shoot it into people, and "poof" you're good. We got this! :tup: The mood everywhere is so somber, I don't get it. More people should be happy, we are really getting close to the end of the worst of this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Actually, we've seen this situation in the U.S. fairly recently. I believe this was similar to the 2009 swine flu outbreak. |
Quote:
So I stand by historic facts: Influenza vaccination has never been a prerequisite for normal life. Besides, even today millions--perhaps billions--of people never get vaccinated regularly against Influenza. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 2:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.