SkyscraperPage Forum

SkyscraperPage Forum (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/index.php)
-   Austin (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=446)
-   -   Circuit of the Americas Development Updates (https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=182007)

satxgreen May 25, 2010 7:24 PM

Circuit of the Americas Development Updates
 
[QUOTE]After a three-year hiatus, Formula One is coming back to the states in 2012 and the city that's been chosen to host the World Cup of Motorsports? Austin, Texas. Yes, Austin.

According to the release from F1, the race will be held in the city from 2012 to 2021, and since Austin doesn't have a race track, a facility will be purpose-built to host the events. Get all the details in the press release after the jump.

[Source: Formula One | Image: Corbis/Getty]/QUOTE]
http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/25/breaking-formula-one-coming-to-austin-texas-in-2012/

Mopacs May 25, 2010 7:29 PM

Very cool! Just read the story in the Statesman a few moments ago...I was wondering where the other F1 racing locations were in the US... guess that answers my question. Puts us in rather select company! Where would they race? Purpose-built facility or on existing roads?

EDIT: Your article notes a purpose-built facility. Wonder where?

Statesman Article

Quote:



Mayor: Formula One is coming to Austin


By Austin American-Statesman staff
Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 02:39 PM


Formula One is coming to Austin, Mayor Lee Leffingwell says.
Leffingwell said he had a conversation with State Comptroller Susan Combs several months ago to start conversations about bringing the global racing event to Austin.

“We have been working with them ever since I first met with Susan to try to make this happen,” Leffingwell said.

According to published reports Tuesday, Austin will host an annual race from 2012 through 2021.

“This is a case of the right timing in the right place,” said Austin-based Tavo Hellmund, the managing parter of Full Throttle Productions, a special event and sports production company that was formed in 2005. “As many Americans know, Austin has earned a reputation as one of the ‘it’ cities in the United States.”

Mopacs May 25, 2010 8:28 PM

... regarding location, it would seem most logical to place along or near the 130 corridor, given available land, proximity to air and ground (highway, out-of-town) transportation, etc. Of course, the eastern fringes of Austin hardly resemble the Hill Country, as the press releases tout :)

the Genral May 25, 2010 9:23 PM

Wow, this is incredible!!! HUGE!!! Hopefully NASCAR will run an event here too.
Now we truly need more Hotel rooms. First I heard of this. Mayor and Gov kept this quiet for a while. Wherever they put the track, it will need to be directly off I35 or 130. These are usually up to week long events which includes promotions, qualifying and the actual race. The track could also be used by tire companies for testing their tires, road rallies, 24 hour races, car companies test driving their vehicles, motorcycle racing and more. OK I'm dreaming, but this is a huge big league victory for Austin.

wwmiv May 25, 2010 10:00 PM

This is HUGE. I'm so excited.

Spaceman May 25, 2010 10:03 PM

This can't be valid...wish it was...this is the most prestigious sport in the world....ton's of $$$$$...It would make Austin a world destination...
Here's the problem. F-1 flys their cars and support equipment in modified Boeing 747's,...ABIA can't handle 747's..

Mikey711MN May 25, 2010 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spaceman (Post 4853220)
Here's the problem. F-1 flys their cars and support equipment in modified Boeing 747's,...ABIA can't handle 747's..

With a runway nearly 12,000' long, they have more than enough pavement to handle a 747 landing or, more relevantly, taking off.

Now, I'm unaware of any gates configured to "handle" a 747 on a jetbridge, but they wouldn't need those anyway.

The airport is a non-issue. Mueller certainly would've been.

Mopacs May 25, 2010 11:12 PM

Is this a typical configuration of a Formula-1 track?

http://www.autodromodoalgarve.com/index

http://www.monchiqueportugal.info/images/circuit2.jpg

http://www.monchiqueportugal.info/New_F1_Race_Track.html
http://www.autodromodoalgarve.com/index

ATXboom May 26, 2010 12:58 AM

http://www.formula1.com/news/headlines/2010/5/10824.html

Its official. this is HUGE... much bigger than a super bowl event. this is like holding the olympics in austin

Time to start building hotels... lots of em.

Regarding the airport... that's funny. For a while ABIA had the longest runway in TX and was an alternate land site for the shuttle. Remember it was a military base first... Any plane can take off and land with ease on the west runway. 13K feet long. It was 14K feet long when the military ran it. DFW's strips were 10K feet but about 10 years ago they extended almost all of them to 12K feet. Jet bridgets are on hydrolics... they can adapt to 747s etc no problemo.

the Genral May 26, 2010 1:09 AM

I watched a 747 with the space shuttle strapped to its back land on ABIA's longest runway (when it was Berstrom AFB). Not sure why you don't think they can handle 747's with a few open wheeled vehicles and equipment.
They can handle the unloading at the cargo area using fork trucks.

austin242 May 26, 2010 2:22 AM

I hope this means add ons to ABIA. :yes:

bluedogok May 26, 2010 3:11 AM

Algarve hasn't held an F1 race, but it is a similar facility. Bahrain, Circuit Losail in Qatar, Shanghai International Circuit are ones built in recent years, Yas Marina in Abu Dhabi was opened up last year.

Hopefully it comes through, then I won't have to travel too far to. We went to Indy in 2007 and had been looking at going to a race next year somewhere.

TXAlex May 26, 2010 3:19 AM

This is exactly what I have been wanting to come here for years. That is just awesome! Huge win for Austin! Now it just better happen.

Austinite May 26, 2010 2:38 PM

when I read about this yesterday I literally couldn't stop laughing. Having composed myself, here's what I have to say about this, ladies: there is zero chance that this will happen; no one will spend $250 million plus on this because - think about it - no one can. And for those of you who've lived in Europe or are otherwise familiar with F1, you know about Bernie Ecclestone and I don't need to say anything about him. Anyway, that 60 room tower over the Robertsons' old building on Congress has a better chance of happening than an F1 track (and that's saying something).

Jdawgboy May 26, 2010 6:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinite (Post 4854050)
when I read about this yesterday I literally couldn't stop laughing. Having composed myself, here's what I have to say about this, ladies: there is zero chance that this will happen; no one will spend $250 million plus on this because - think about it - no one can. And for those of you who've lived in Europe or are otherwise familiar with F1, you know about Bernie Ecclestone and I don't need to say anything about him. Anyway, that 60 room tower over the Robertsons' old building on Congress has a better chance of happening than an F1 track (and that's saying something).

Here's the problem with your statement. One, Formula 1 would not be announcing this in the first place if they didn't intend to do it. They signed a contract with the city of Austin. Two, This has been in the works for awhile now albiet secretive. I got off the phone just this morning with a friend in San Jose, who has connections with people who have known about this deal for months and he knew this announcenment was comming even though he didn't bother to tell me ealier which I chewed him out for it lol. Three..., im not sure where your getting that $250 million from because they havn't stated the ammount that this would cost. The $250 million is the ammount of money that will be pumped into the Austin economy because of this event. You remind me of all those who said the Austonian would never be built lol.

This is earth shattering news for the city of Austin. Not only will we be hosting a true international event, but there will be thousands of new jobs that will be created here because of Formula 1. Not just the event itself, but the residual affect. Hotels will be sprining up downtown like weeds (hopefully tall ones), not to mention other parts of the city. The track will be used year around as well, not just for this one event. Companies that are researching alternative fuels will set up shop here to use the track for testing. This is as big as they come for any city and this will propel our city like a slingshot over the next several years. You think our population was going to grow before, now with this announcment you can bank on a pretty big population growth spurt that most likely would have never happend if this event never came here.

DruidCity May 26, 2010 9:25 PM

I know some of you hate roads, but with all of this "world-class growth," what can be done to improve Austin's infrastructure to handle the growth ?

From San Marcos, I've found that it often takes as long to travel 25 miles north to Austin as it does to travel 50 miles south to San Antonio.
San Antonio is also a large, fast-growing city, but somehow I never see the traffic jammed up like I do so often on Austin's stretch of I-35.

What is I-35 going to be like when you host world-class events like Formula One ?

Schertz1 May 26, 2010 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Austinite (Post 4854050)
when I read about this yesterday I literally couldn't stop laughing. Having composed myself, here's what I have to say about this, ladies: there is zero chance that this will happen; no one will spend $250 million plus on this because - think about it - no one can. And for those of you who've lived in Europe or are otherwise familiar with F1, you know about Bernie Ecclestone and I don't need to say anything about him. Anyway, that 60 room tower over the Robertsons' old building on Congress has a better chance of happening than an F1 track (and that's saying something).

It may, the State of Texas is providing 25,000,000 a year to host the event in Austin for a ten-year run. If the event happens, we - Texas - are open to providing more dinero.

Austinite May 27, 2010 12:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jdawgboy (Post 4854380)
Here's the problem with your statement. One, Formula 1 would not be announcing this in the first place if they didn't intend to do it. They signed a contract with the city of Austin. Two, This has been in the works for awhile now albiet secretive. I got off the phone just this morning with a friend in San Jose, who has connections with people who have known about this deal for months and he knew this announcenment was comming even though he didn't bother to tell me ealier which I chewed him out for it lol. Three..., im not sure where your getting that $250 million from because they havn't stated the ammount that this would cost. The $250 million is the ammount of money that will be pumped into the Austin economy because of this event. You remind me of all those who said the Austonian would never be built lol.

This is earth shattering news for the city of Austin. Not only will we be hosting a true international event, but there will be thousands of new jobs that will be created here because of Formula 1. Not just the event itself, but the residual affect. Hotels will be sprining up downtown like weeds (hopefully tall ones), not to mention other parts of the city. The track will be used year around as well, not just for this one event. Companies that are researching alternative fuels will set up shop here to use the track for testing. This is as big as they come for any city and this will propel our city like a slingshot over the next several years. You think our population was going to grow before, now with this announcment you can bank on a pretty big population growth spurt that most likely would have never happend if this event never came here.

The Statesman article provided that building the track could cost $250 million. Because many other things necessary for this event would cost many additional millions of dollars, I stated that this would cost more than $250 million.

I suppose it's possible that the event would, as you say, pump $250 million into the local economy. That would be wonderful, if true. The problem would be in raising that much start up capital during perhaps the worst year for private and public finance in the history of private and public finance.

Everyone is broke. Which leads me to my next post . . .

Austinite May 27, 2010 1:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schertz1 (Post 4854912)
It may, the State of Texas is providing 25,000,000 a year to host the event in Austin for a ten-year run. If the event happens, we - Texas - are open to providing more dinero.

The state is having to make staggering budgetary decisions on things like education, health care, and infrastructure because it is running a 10 digit deficit. Therefore, you can be certain that legislators will give Austin $25 million every year to help a sport that most of them, when they learn of its existence, will find vaguely Belgian. This will happen, of course, the instant a Laredo parking lot freezes-over in July.

wwmiv May 27, 2010 1:23 AM

25 million is really NOT that much money. To put this in perspective: The direct connectors at the 183 and 290 interchange are costing around 107 million.

LoneStarMike May 27, 2010 2:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mopacs (Post 4853092)
... regarding location, it would seem most logical to place along or near the 130 corridor, given available land, proximity to air and ground (highway, out-of-town) transportation, etc.

I wonder if they might put it on the site of the abandoned Villa Muse project? The whole Villa Muse project was supposed to be 681 acres 15 minutes east of downtown and 15 minutes northeast of the airport.

electricron May 27, 2010 2:21 AM

Congrats to Austin.

Too bad Fort Worth already has two NASCAR and one Izod Indy Car racing events, because that just leaves one Formula 1 event per year.
NASCAR isn't expanding anymore, there's already new oval tracks waiting inline for a new Nascar event. it's possible Izod Indy Car may provide a second event for the Austin track to strengthen its appeal in Texas. I'm not so sure F1 would allow that.

There are road courses all over America available for testing new technologies already, a new one really isn't needed.

The ATX May 27, 2010 2:30 AM

I'm curious as to how this will be financed and built so quickly in an era where virtually no large projects can obtain financing. If/when construction starts there needs to be flood of financing made available to hotel developers.

Spaceman May 27, 2010 3:14 AM

For a track to be ready for the 2012 season wouldn't ground have to be broken almost immediately...The track would be the easy part...pit garages, grandstands, media centers, parking, the list is endless..that's a LOT of structures to build ...I hope this happens but I can't see how it can be done in two years. The Austonian took nearly two years and it is miniscule compared the the vastness of a race track.

wwmiv May 27, 2010 3:22 AM

Financing is available, but only to the projects most likely to give a good return. I don't know where the track itself will get funding, but you can be sure that financiers and lenders will see this event as literally an insurance policy. In fact, this event is so large that many projects in similar markets (Charlotte, Raleigh, etc.) that were seen as likely to get financing could now not get financing due to an absorption effect into the Austin market of what limited funds that there are at the moment.

This is the biggest thing to ever happen for Austin apart from two things: The government (which is also responsible for UT) and Dell.

Austinite May 27, 2010 4:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwmiv (Post 4855256)
Financing is available, but only to the projects most likely to give a good return. I don't know where the track itself will get funding, but you can be sure that financiers and lenders will see this event as literally an insurance policy. In fact, this event is so large that many projects in similar markets (Charlotte, Raleigh, etc.) that were seen as likely to get financing could now not get financing due to an absorption effect into the Austin market of what limited funds that there are at the moment.

This is the biggest thing to ever happen for Austin apart from two things: The government (which is also responsible for UT) and Dell.

ha ha ha ha

bluedogok May 27, 2010 4:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DruidCity (Post 4854670)
I know some of you hate roads, but with all of this "world-class growth," what can be done to improve Austin's infrastructure to handle the growth ?

From San Marcos, I've found that it often takes as long to travel 25 miles north to Austin as it does to travel 50 miles south to San Antonio.
San Antonio is also a large, fast-growing city, but somehow I never see the traffic jammed up like I do so often on Austin's stretch of I-35.

What is I-35 going to be like when you host world-class events like Formula One ?

I went to San Antonio a few times this month, I-35 around Selma/Schertz is just as bad and 410 gets bad. The people complain about Austin traffic I guess have never been stuck in traffic in Dallas or Houston.

Quote:

Originally Posted by electricron (Post 4855154)
Congrats to Austin.

Too bad Fort Worth already has two NASCAR and one Izod Indy Car racing events, because that just leaves one Formula 1 event per year.
NASCAR isn't expanding anymore, there's already new oval tracks waiting inline for a new Nascar event. it's possible Izod Indy Car may provide a second event for the Austin track to strengthen its appeal in Texas. I'm not so sure F1 would allow that.

There are road courses all over America available for testing new technologies already, a new one really isn't needed.

There is only one FIA sanctioned track in the US, Indy. Nascar ovals are overbuilt as the wait for race dates shows. There is a shortage of tracks that can hold these type of events in this part of the country as most of the tracks are country club style tracks or older tracks, neither were designed to handle these type of events. Road courses can handle all sorts of events and for the track to be profitable they would have to have other high profile events along with a bunch of regional events.

A FIA sanctioned track where F1 race could become the premiere facility in the country and attract the events that don't come to this part of the country because the proper facilities don't exist. I could see an ALMS race signing on quickly, they have nothing between Miller (Salt Lake City) and Barber (Birmingham, Alabama) since the Houston event folded due to the IRL/Champ Car merger, it was a crappy parking lot race anyway. World Superbike has hinted at wanting a second race in the US, MotoGP is another possibility.

I have heard there are large foreign investors behind this proposal, which if true is better than trying to get a financial company to invest in something like this. As far as the time frame many of the recent tracks have been built in about 18 months. Much of what is done is the track and necessary facilities are built and more amenities are built after the first race.

I consider myself hopeful that it will come through, I consider myself "cautiously optimistic" that it will.

TexasPlaya May 27, 2010 4:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedogok (Post 4855359)
I went to San Antonio a few times this month, I-35 around Selma/Schertz is just as bad and 410 gets bad. The people complain about Austin traffic I guess have never been stuck in traffic in Dallas or Houston.

No, I-35 is way more annoying than anything I've driven on in Houston. Just my two cents.

wwmiv May 27, 2010 5:12 AM

Everything is Austin is way more annoying than anything I've driven in Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio.

ATXboom May 27, 2010 4:25 PM

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/track-site-engineers-secured-f1-group-says-711472.html

Track Site & Engineers secured

The Lorax May 27, 2010 9:25 PM

I agree that those who whine about Austin traffic need to spend some time inching south on 610 West between I-10 and the US 59 split. Painful.

I really don't see this happening. Perhaps its a play, a bluff to shake some incentives out of a New York or California facility.

Jdawgboy May 27, 2010 9:48 PM

This is not a play and the fact is they are farther ahead than the public knows about. They already have the land, they had it before the announcment was made, they just don't want the public to know exactly where it is just yet. They have big investors from what I hear and yes there is some international investors, this is not some pipe dream that people are throwing around. I can understand people's reluctance to really accept something this huge to happen here when honestly I never thought anything like this would happen in Austin. But all in all this project is very well off and has been in the works for awhile. They don't just announce something like this out of the spur of the moment with no investors or land and just say Hey Formula 1 is comming!!!! Im sure we will hear about the construction start of the track fairly soon.

NormalgeNyus May 27, 2010 10:53 PM

wasnt there suppose to be a track being built just east of the airport. never heard about a race being held on it but it was suppose to be a road course

Schertz1 May 28, 2010 1:40 AM

I35 just south of New Braunfels to 1604 is brutal.

If this is built it will be good for Austin, but I would not expect too much from it. The 250 million a year impact is inflated. The impact will likely be just north of 100 million, closer to what Indianapolis experienced. Nevertheless, it will still be good for the region.

feconi May 28, 2010 5:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedogok (Post 4855359)
I went to San Antonio a few times this month, I-35 around Selma/Schertz is just as bad and 410 gets bad. The people complain about Austin traffic I guess have never been stuck in traffic in Dallas or Houston.

That's merely subjective. I've seen no other freeway in Texas with the kind of all-day congestion as on I-35 in central Austin. The worst of Dallas and Houston might compare, but not San Antonio.

The stretch of freeway you reference in SA has 139,000 vehicles per day on six lanes. The stretch of I-35 in Austin that I'm referencing has 227,000 vehicles per day on six lanes. I'm guessing you're not on I-35 in Austin much.

ATXboom May 28, 2010 7:27 PM

http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A1034935

TXAlex May 28, 2010 8:03 PM

Wish I owned the concrete company that will get or has that contract.

KevinFromTexas May 28, 2010 11:40 PM

The problem with I-35 is everyone and their dog uses it. And it's used by many more people than just Austinites. I-35 is the main north/south route in the US for transportation. People like to blame Austin for the traffic on it, but really the problem is much greater than just city traffic. Most of our other major highways are no where near as bad. Mopac can be a pain sometimes, but really I don't think anything comes close to I-35.

Loop 610 in Houston can be pretty bad. We've been stuck there more than a handful of times. And I-35 through Dallas can be bad. San Antonio though has pretty good flow, but there have been times when I-35 has been at a crawl there too.

The thing is, that's just the nature of highways.

ATXboom May 29, 2010 1:37 PM

http://m.statesman.com/statesman/db_43071/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=E7ZdYIqp&src=cat

UTSABA06 May 29, 2010 7:18 PM

I hate Austin traffic!

DougRockstead May 29, 2010 10:00 PM

Formula 1
 
The eastside is the only part of town that could handle dispersing traffice after an event like that. The traffic issues is horrible on the west side, thanks to all the westside nimby's shooting down any improvements to the roads out there. No one wants SH45 out there because they don't want the increased traffic it could bring to their neighborhoods.
The Eastside makes more sense.

bluedogok May 30, 2010 3:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by feconi (Post 4857475)
The stretch of freeway you reference in SA has 139,000 vehicles per day on six lanes. The stretch of I-35 in Austin that I'm referencing has 227,000 vehicles per day on six lanes. I'm guessing you're not on I-35 in Austin much.

Nope, I live here in South Austin in between I-35 and Mopac, I take Mopac about 90% of the time. I avoid it like the plague. My wife works right off I-35 between 290/183 and when I have had to pick her up from work it doesn't seem as bad as I have seen in the past. What I was really saying is that interstate traffic is pretty much bad in the major cities anywhere, San Antonio is not immune or some tremendous oasis of no traffic issues. If someone thinks Austin is the "worst in the world" then they must not have seen much of the world or driven in those places with major traffic issues. Most people think "traffic is bad" when they can't set the cruise 60 mph on an interstate highway.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 4857960)
The problem with I-35 is everyone and their dog uses it. And it's used by many more people than just Austinites. I-35 is the main north/south route in the US for transportation. People like to blame Austin for the traffic on it, but really the problem is much greater than just city traffic. Most of our other major highways are no where near as bad. Mopac can be a pain sometimes, but really I don't think anything comes close to I-35.

Loop 610 in Houston can be pretty bad. We've been stuck there more than a handful of times. And I-35 through Dallas can be bad. San Antonio though has pretty good flow, but there have been times when I-35 has been at a crawl there too.

The thing is, that's just the nature of highways.

I commuted to Dallas for four months in 2005, leaving at 6:00 am on Monday mornings I would say a good 80% of the traffic on I-35 was semi-truck traffic, bumper to bumper all the way to the I-35 split near Hillsboro. Most of those were probably out of San Antonio or points further south, I was getting on at William Cannon so I was having to head through town every morning.

KevinFromTexas May 31, 2010 11:10 PM

It does sound promising when you read about their ability to fund this. Also, this article mentions that they never approached any wealthy car enthusiasts in Texas. Now that those people know about the planned track, they say they'd like the chance to help pay for it.

http://www.statesman.com/sports/pro/f1-austin-announcement-a-big-surprise-to-many-718374.html
Quote:

F1 Austin announcement a big surprise to many

By John Maher

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Published: 8:54 p.m. Sunday, May 30, 2010

While there is some skepticism in racing circles about announced plans to bring a Formula One event to Austin in 2012, there is also plenty of support and enthusiasm for the project both locally and internationally.

One of the oddest things about Tavo Hellmund's plan to build a $250 million Formula One racing facility is that people who would seem to be the most likely investors — very wealthy Texan car enthusiasts — aren't. Most weren't even approached. Neither were their friends. That segment had no idea Hellmund's project was in the works — and some of them apparently would at least like a chance to get in on the action.

Last week, Hellmund said his investment group was complete and sufficient to pull off the grand project, but he left open the possibility that other investors could be added.

One person who did hear some buzz was Tracy Krohn, founder and CEO of W&T Offshore, Inc. In recent years the Houston oilman has been ranked in Forbes' Top 400 wealthiest Americans and in the Top 1,000 in the world. Krohn is not only the owner of Krohn Racing, he's an avid driver. This weekend he's at the 2010 GRAND-AM Rolex Sports Car Series at Lime Rock Park in Connecticut for the Memorial Day Classic.

...

KevinFromTexas Jun 2, 2010 6:15 AM

http://www.statesman.com/news/texas-poli...ld-foot-1st-formula-one-bill-721621.html
Quote:

Texas taxpayers would foot 1st Formula One bill
Budget rider allows $25 million in state money to be used for fee to bring international race.

By Eric Dexheimer

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Published: 9:25 p.m. Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Contrary to earlier assertions, Texas taxpayers are putting up the first $25 million in a deal aimed at luring Formula One racing to Austin.

And the money, to be deposited in the state's Major Event Trust Fund, would pay the sanctioning fee London-based Formula One Group charges for the privilege of hosting the first of 10 annual F1 races planned for Austin beginning in 2012. Austin resident Tavo Hellmund would organize and promote the races.

Last week, state officials said money from the fund would not go to the promoter but to local governments to reimburse them for costs incurred in hosting such large sporting events. Previously, the fund, which has been used to cover costs associated with hosting the Super Bowl and baseball and basketball all-star games, has been generated from sales taxes and other tax receipts in host communities that are attributable to spending at the event.

...

KevinFromTexas Jun 7, 2010 2:35 AM

Man, check out the grand stands and, is that a hotel in the 2nd pic?

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/form...?srcTrk=RTR_661354&viewAsSinglePage=true
Quote:

Formula One racetrack designer was recruited for an Austin racing venture once before
Last project to which Hermann Tilke's name attached was a country club for enthusiasts that got a red flag from economy.

By John Maher

AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF

Updated: 10:28 p.m. Saturday, June 5, 2010
Published: 9:36 p.m. Saturday, June 5, 2010

Aside from billionaire boss Bernie Ecclestone, few figures in the flamboyant world of Formula One racing are more polarizing than Hermann Tilke, a 55-year-old German engineer.

When Tilke GmbH was announced as the designer for the proposed Austin Grand Prix track, race fans here and around the globe were quick to post scathing comments on websites charging that Tilke and his "boring" courses were killing racing. "Effete," "sterile" and "characterless" are some of the adjectives heaped by self-appointed critics on his designs.

...

bluedogok Jun 8, 2010 4:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas (Post 4868163)
Man, check out the grand stands and, is that a hotel in the 2nd pic?

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/form...?srcTrk=RTR_661354&viewAsSinglePage=true

Most of the Tilke tracks are kind of boring, Instanbul (where the last F1 race was held) is one of the better tracks, especially the 5 apex "neck stretcher" turn. I don't know whether it is his track designs or the terrain that makes them less interesting than the older, traditional tracks like Spa Francorchamps. Most of them have been done in locations without much terrain, like the deserts of the Middle East, Shanghai or Maylaysia. It will be interesting to see what he comes up with.

hookem Jun 8, 2010 6:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedogok (Post 4869721)
Most of the Tilke tracks are kind of boring, Instanbul (where the last F1 race was held) is one of the better tracks, especially the 5 apex "neck stretcher" turn. I don't know whether it is his track designs or the terrain that makes them less interesting than the older, traditional tracks like Spa Francorchamps. Most of them have been done in locations without much terrain, like the deserts of the Middle East, Shanghai or Maylaysia. It will be interesting to see what he comes up with.

Honestly, it's hard for us Americans to understand what a "boring" or "interesting" track is. We just know ovals. Beyond that we wonder about the grandstands and box suites, RV sites, parking, etc.

Sad, I know.

Spaceman Jul 8, 2010 1:45 AM

It appears that Bernie's true motive has been revealed...The Austin GP announcement was really a ploy to get the New York area to up its bid for the Grand Prix....Even thought Austin would be the "real USGP" the New York race would quickly overshadow Austin's race....The clout of New York and its hugh population, media, and international access has ended this dream for Austin....Too bad...It would have changed this city more than anything since the early tech immigration of the 60's and 70's...Austin never had a chance...The guy is a snake and that's an insult to the snake community.

austin242 Jul 10, 2010 9:44 AM

I always knew it was probably to good to be true. Just like the white water waller creek. It would have been something new that no other downtown had but no. They go for the lame river walk that every other city these days are makeing. TStacy's Tower, Villa muse, Lady B lake Boardwalk, Museum tower, Green being finished by 2014 , H.E.B. downtown, Childrens Museum at the W, a real commuter rail and much much more. It just makes me sad, and none of these things usually say that its not going to happen they downgrade it into something that doesn't even matter or just plain out don't say anything at all or even worse say it will happen in the next four years and then they say next four years just like the overpasses at I35 and Benwhit/ 71 Its always going to be but isn't.:hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell: :hell:

JoninATX Jul 10, 2010 4:34 PM

It's okay let New York or some other state have it, we still got alot of great things to be proud for, Austin needs a major attraction something different like an indoor ski area or a small disney theme park not sure if that would go well with Earthquest and six flags close to each other but its a start :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.