Quote:
|
|
|
i need to dial back my enthusiasm on this one.
I feel like I'm setting myself up for disappointment. Never had a tinder date, but I've heard some horror stories from buddies. I hope that the result will live up. I really hated the Independent crown, and now I freaking love it....I see each night peaking over the pecan tree in my back yard and it makes me smile. The lighting team killed it. I want the Sail to inspire me...I want it to draw us back downtown...I want it to force local architects to contend with it....I want it to cajole Cristopher Cross out of retirement to sing at the Grand Opening....I want to make sweet, sweet........reservations at the Michelin 3-Star bbq restaurant destined for the Sail.....I want to set up my easel on top of Doug Sahm Hill and paint a masterpiece of her gracious curve. Anyone got an easel I can borrow? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMkIuKXwmlU |
Quote:
|
It's been a while since I heard anyone mention Christopher Cross, so I Googled him to see what he was up to. He was recently very ill with Covid, but as of two weeks ago he has fully recovered.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am honored ;) |
Side note, I used to work with a guy who may have been the real life Garth. I sometimes wonder if Dana Carvey met him before filming Wayne's World.
|
Quote:
|
imo burying cesar chavez is more important than burying 35
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Burying 35 seems like a nice idea but maybe tackling same problem at a smaller scale would be a good idea? and is there a better opportunity than cesar? lamar? congress? (obv i think cesar is better opp) |
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
i can promise you traffic will still be horrendous after/if 35 is buried. which is why i'm more keen on developing land (via burying road) on a tract that touches waterfront AND cuts through our current DT area AND would be much cheaper |
Short of making this another transportation thread, traffic flow wold be *slightly* improved due to fewer on- and off-ramps for the length of the tunnel, if they do it the right way. This will allow for through-traffic to continue without the slow-downs commonly experienced from people entering and exiting the expressway.
All that said, the financial gains from land made available is definitely the loudest argument, and certainly one to which property owners, city leaders, and others will play close attention. I'm not arguing against that direction at all. It is interesting that you offer the property value and development potential view for Cesar Chavez. I think it would be awesome, personally, but I have to ask if that's just an opinion that you floated or if you've seen something of that idea posted elsewhere. Just curious. Either way, buildings (such as Block 185) on Cesar Chavez would do well to encourage pedestrian interaction. The library even seems to focus more on the creek interaction. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 6:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.