I would vote for NABI but they don't exist anymore
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee
Is none of the above an option? I suppose Gillig is ok for smaller markets because of the no bullshit approach to what they offer and I would have to give kudos to New Flyer for at least partnering with Alex Dennis to offer their new Midi bus. Since I form my opinions admittedly based mostly on aesthetic concerns, I think most North American buses are horrible - clunky, bulky, cheap and outdated looking. As a rail advocate I hate to encourage buses in general but I do wish GM would get back in the game much the same way I wish GE would get back in the game with electric locos. If GM offered a sexy styled workhorse bus I think they would capture significant market share like they once had. Other than that, I'd like to see MAN re-enter the NA market as well as more agencies considering Van Hool and Benz.
|
Aesthetic is subjective so I will just leave it at that...
MAN, Van Hool, and Daimler were all in the market before but none of them can hack it. Daimler being the most recent to pack it up and go home with their Orion buses not getting enough orders.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Busy Bee
Where did you get that information? RATP operates Renault buses that have been in service for well over 10 years. Many US agencies replace well before 12 years.
|
Many US agencies
If the bus goes over 500,000 miles, they are eligible for retirement but generally speaking, the transit buses in the US age out (12 years) before they exceed 500,000 miles. Outside of a few isolated cases, I can't think of any example of early retirement.
Another important factor to consider regarding durability and why European buses typically have trouble in the US - US transit buses rack up a lot more mileage than European or Asian transit buses over their service lives. The typical London bus route is something like 12 km. The typical bus route in Los Angeles is 30 miles.