HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3621  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 12:37 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
If you discount urbanism enthusiasts, then very few cities including those with the most famous skylines would be instantly recognisable in silhouette to those outside the local area.

The ones that would have the best chance are probably those with observation towers like Seattle, or if you showed a silhouette that included the ESB people would recognise NY. But then if you showed a building with a similar roof line like a couple in Atlanta, you'd fool most of them.

Non-urbanism enthusiasts do well to recognise most cities in a clear, high detail, perfectly lit daytime shot.
I'd guess something of Paris with the Eiffel Tower, and something of London with Westminster, would do fine.

For Canadians with a degree of interest my only guesses would be Toronto and maybe Quebec City (the big gaps and prominence of Chateau Frontenac give it a chance). They'd have to know if was a Canadian city, and even then I think it would be a small number. Slim chance for Niagara Falls, and maybe Montreal would get a few just by population numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3622  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 1:25 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Canadian cities are extremely generic. We don't really do big and bold.

I couldn't describe what Ottawa and Quebec City's skylines look like. Nothing comes to mind. Only CN Tower and Harbour Centre/Canada Place really stick out, but I see Harbour Centre/Canada Place from my condo so I am biased on that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3623  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 2:53 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 9,103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
I'd guess something of Paris with the Eiffel Tower, and something of London with Westminster, would do fine.

For Canadians with a degree of interest my only guesses would be Toronto and maybe Quebec City (the big gaps and prominence of Chateau Frontenac give it a chance). They'd have to know if was a Canadian city, and even then I think it would be a small number. Slim chance for Niagara Falls, and maybe Montreal would get a few just by population numbers.
In London if you were to take a silhouette shot of just the Westminster area maybe, but the Westminster clock tower wouldn't even be visible in the general skyline. But St. Paul's is pretty distinctive.

But definitely true for observation tower cities like Paris. Especially since the Eiffel tends to be more distinctive than the more modern ones.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3624  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 3:15 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,172
London also has the London Eye and that is basically in every summer blockbuster movie these days.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3625  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 7:51 PM
TRiToNDREyJA's Avatar
TRiToNDREyJA TRiToNDREyJA is offline
Create and Conquer
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: 204
Posts: 199
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberguy View Post
lol, this is so sad.
It all starts somewhere. And it is sad. But in Winnipeg standards, this is still a complete change in the big picture.

Over the past decade Toronto has gone from like 50-89 on a scale to 100.

Winnipeg is going from like 0-28 in the next decade

Which is still sad but its still an overhaul for a city like ours.

And London isn't recognizable by silhouette without the London eye and and all, but what about to someone who lives in England? Could be a different story.
__________________
Life is strange, so am I
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3626  
Old Posted Sep 27, 2015, 8:12 PM
Villaggio Villaggio is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Ville de Québec
Posts: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Canadian cities are extremely generic. We don't really do big and bold.

I couldn't describe what Ottawa and Quebec City's skylines look like. Nothing comes to mind. Only CN Tower and Harbour Centre/Canada Place really stick out, but I see Harbour Centre/Canada Place from my condo so I am biased on that.
Not even this?



Pretty recognizable IMO
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3627  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 12:17 PM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by Villaggio View Post
Not even this?



Pretty recognizable IMO
That's very cool looking and I knew Quebec had a great old world style look but I drew a blank on landmarks. Didn't realize that hotel was so big.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3628  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 12:28 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 11,609
Quebec City and Ottawa don't really have skylines.. It's like saying "i don't know what washington's skyline looks like".. It doesn't have one. The cities are recognizable by famous buildings instead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3629  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 2:17 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinion View Post
Canadian cities are extremely generic. We don't really do big and bold.

I couldn't describe what Ottawa and Quebec City's skylines look like. Nothing comes to mind. Only CN Tower and Harbour Centre/Canada Place really stick out, but I see Harbour Centre/Canada Place from my condo so I am biased on that.
We don't do big and bold because we've only got one actually big city and don't have many Oil Sheikhs looking to pump up their egos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3630  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 2:34 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Quebec City and Ottawa don't really have skylines.. It's like saying "i don't know what washington's skyline looks like".. It doesn't have one. The cities are recognizable by famous buildings instead.
Exactly! Speaking of our National Capital, I'm going to Ottawa next week for the first time (shameful I know).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3631  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 2:48 PM
MichaelS's Avatar
MichaelS MichaelS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,402
Quote:
Originally Posted by tshalk View Post
Calgary, Alberta

This is great. Just need the 7 tower Eau Claire B-Lands proposal in there and it will be complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3632  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 3:30 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Canmore, AB
Posts: 66,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by tshalk View Post
Very impressive come 2025 or so.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3633  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 3:34 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
We don't do big and bold because we've only got one actually big city and don't have many Oil Sheikhs looking to pump up their egos.
In the 1970's to the early 1980's Toronto was "That City"

Now Toronto has regressed back its conservative design idology.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3634  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 5:21 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,047
Toronto? It's basically nation wide. Not enough competition between the developers building the towers and the companies occupying them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3635  
Old Posted Sep 28, 2015, 7:25 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
In the 1970's to the early 1980's Toronto was "That City"

Now Toronto has regressed back its conservative design idology.
Which is good. Toronto needs more girth than height unless it wants to look like one of those skeletal US skylines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3636  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2015, 4:50 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
Just can't get my hands around it but really not impressed with the Eau Claire Market development! IMO, it just doesn't fit in that area.... I've always thought it was a silly looking development. The rest of that Calgary photo looks great!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3637  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2015, 2:19 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 9,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by TallBob View Post
Just can't get my hands around it but really not impressed with the Eau Claire Market development! IMO, it just doesn't fit in that area.... I've always thought it was a silly looking development. The rest of that Calgary photo looks great!

I like it, the only thing about it that makes it feel a bit out of place is it feels a little bulky, at least the taller tower does. Still nice though. I'd like something like that on Toronto's waterfront. It would look good on Nun's Island as well.

Last edited by TorontoDrew; Sep 29, 2015 at 6:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3638  
Old Posted Sep 29, 2015, 5:06 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,047
The individual towers are decent. Together there's not enough variation in the sculptural forms with too much mass on the south end of the site. Overall, not a bad attempt at "wow factor" while maximizing every inch of density under the shadowing rule
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3639  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2015, 3:47 AM
TallBob TallBob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,135
It's typical... in this case instead of twins, which Calgary is famous for, it's 3-4-5 buildings of the same style. And a couple of these (Eau Claire) are just really fat/bulky looking!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3640  
Old Posted Oct 1, 2015, 1:59 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 24,068
If you know Parliament, you can recognize Ottawa's skyline, dominated by the Peace Tower and other late 19th Century, early 20th Century Gothic Revival Federal buildings.

Office and condo towers are as generic as can be and can barely be recognized by many people born and raised in the Ottawa area.


http://graphicriver.net/item/ottawa-...ground/4368164


http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/arch.../t-140994.html

And a couple future Ottawa skyline shots to stay on topic. Former Delta Hotel (12 and 17 floors) will be demolished for a new hotel and condo tower (27 and 23 floors):


http://www.obj.ca/Real-Estate/Constr...61-Queen-St./1
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:15 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.