HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #41  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 2:59 AM
NutmeG's Avatar
NutmeG NutmeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 110
^^^ THis is not a language thread but a contruction thread for montreal.. i don't see any reason to bring up whatever it is u were trying to say...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #42  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 3:49 AM
Gilbert's Avatar
Gilbert Gilbert is offline
Vive Stéphane Dion!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 478
Update 13/03/07

- Les Résidences Gouverneurs are now under construction.

- The website of le 1500 René-Lévesque Ouest is closed, the rental office too. The project will be probably cancelled.

- There is new renders of the 701 University :







- There is new projects:

Le Lowney

Architects: ?
Completion: 2008
Usage: Residential
Status: Approved

? meters - 10 floors






Campus de l'UDM

Architects: ?
Status: Under construction
Completion:2010
Usage: New residences for 1000 students of Université de Montréal
Cost: $1 billion







333 Sherbrooke phase 2

Architects: ?
Completion:2008
Usage: Residential
Status: Approved

? meters - 10 floors








Last edited by Gilbert; Mar 14, 2007 at 3:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #43  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 8:16 AM
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,338
701 University = Saint Jacques lands ... is it approved ??
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #44  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2007, 6:47 PM
Gilbert's Avatar
Gilbert Gilbert is offline
Vive Stéphane Dion!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 478
Unfortunately, the project just a proposal...but a serious proposal!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #45  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2007, 2:25 AM
Gilbert's Avatar
Gilbert Gilbert is offline
Vive Stéphane Dion!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Montréal, Québec
Posts: 478
Construction update: (I took all of those pictures, exept the one of 400 Sherbrooke Ouest)

Crystal de La Montagne, 18/02/07



Îlot Voyageur, 02/01/07



Terrases Windsor, 02/01/07



Tour Québécor, 02/01/07



Westin Montréal, 02/01/07



801 Signature, 02/01/07



Beaux-Arts Condominiums
, --/12/07



Le Concorde
, 18/02/07



400 Sherbrooke Ouest, 01/03/07 (Picture by francely57)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #46  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2007, 12:14 AM
hockey rules!'s Avatar
hockey rules! hockey rules! is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Montréal
Posts: 592
Le Westin Montréal sera environ quoi, 100 mètres de haut?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #47  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2007, 12:08 AM
PeterSmith's Avatar
PeterSmith PeterSmith is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 43
Montreal is such a fantastic city. Great to see so many cool projects in the works. Montreal's architecture is amongst the best in the world, hands down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #48  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2007, 1:39 AM
Wheelingman04's Avatar
Wheelingman04 Wheelingman04 is offline
Pittsburgh rocks!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Salem, OH (near Youngstown)
Posts: 8,800
Nice update, Gilbert.
__________________
1 hour from Pittsburgh and 1 hour from Cleveland
Go Ohio State!!
Ohio Proud!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #49  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2007, 9:55 PM
Rnr_ss's Avatar
Rnr_ss Rnr_ss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sherbrooke
Posts: 324
Est-ce qu'il y a des bonnes nouvelles pour le 1300 René-Lévesque Ouest ? Ou le projet est mort ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #50  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2007, 2:55 PM
West_aust's Avatar
West_aust West_aust is offline
Vorsprung Durch Technik
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 1,080
New project - Redeveloppement of Bonaventure expressway into an urban boulevard and a new entrance to the city





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #51  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2007, 7:41 PM
floralieca's Avatar
floralieca floralieca is offline
Attention, chien méchant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dogville
Posts: 940
Question sur l'ilot voyageur, avec les problèmes de l'UQAM est-ce que la portion de 13 étages qui donne sur Maisonneuve sera construite ou pas ?
__________________
Please mind the gap Floralieca's blog
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #52  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2007, 9:17 PM
malek's Avatar
malek malek is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montréal
Posts: 8,185
oui
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #53  
Old Posted May 18, 2007, 9:35 PM
MaJc_QC MaJc_QC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Pourquoi il y a-t-il une limite de hauteur pour les buildings qui sont situés à l'est et à l'ouest du Mont-Royal????
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #54  
Old Posted May 19, 2007, 4:03 PM
MaJc_QC MaJc_QC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Bon, maybe somone can answer my question in english..........why is ther an height limit for the buildings located east and west of the Mount Royal???
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #55  
Old Posted May 27, 2007, 1:05 AM
Rnr_ss's Avatar
Rnr_ss Rnr_ss is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sherbrooke
Posts: 324
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaJc_QC View Post
Pourquoi il y a-t-il une limite de hauteur pour les buildings qui sont situés à l'est et à l'ouest du Mont-Royal????
Je pense que c'est pour garder un genre d'effet de contraste. En mettant les building moins grand que la montagne, elle parait plus grande et les buildings aussi. Par exemple, les buildings à Toronto paraissent tous petits à côté de la tour du CN, tandis que plusieurs d'entre eux sont plus grands que les gratte ciel à Montréal. Aussi pour que le mont soit dans le sky-line et qu'on le perdre pas de vue derrière les buildings. La limite de hauteur est autour de 210mètre.
Corriger moi si je me trompe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #56  
Old Posted Aug 1, 2007, 3:48 AM
Gjm137 Gjm137 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rnr_ss View Post
Je pense que c'est pour garder un genre d'effet de contraste. En mettant les building moins grand que la montagne, elle parait plus grande et les buildings aussi. Par exemple, les buildings à Toronto paraissent tous petits à côté de la tour du CN, tandis que plusieurs d'entre eux sont plus grands que les gratte ciel à Montréal. Aussi pour que le mont soit dans le sky-line et qu'on le perdre pas de vue derrière les buildings. La limite de hauteur est autour de 210mètre.
Corriger moi si je me trompe
230 metres je penese bien...
Esceque Vancouver a aussi cette type de restriction? On diriait qu'il y a un grand nombre de gratte-ciels qui sont tous sous une certaine limite...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #57  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2007, 3:37 AM
Arseniq33's Avatar
Arseniq33 Arseniq33 is offline
Sláinte!
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 71
The View from Labatt Park would have been awesome!
__________________
Raise What's left of the Flag for Me
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #58  
Old Posted Aug 25, 2007, 5:42 AM
Montréalais Montréalais is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West-Island/ Montreal
Posts: 44
Nice thread Gilbert!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #59  
Old Posted Sep 19, 2007, 7:15 PM
steve81 steve81 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gjm137 View Post
230 metres je penese bien...
Esceque Vancouver a aussi cette type de restriction? On diriait qu'il y a un grand nombre de gratte-ciels qui sont tous sous une certaine limite...
Réponse sur Wikipedia en anglais :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vancouver
Quote:
Vancouver's "View Protection Guidelines" were approved in 1989 and amended in 1990, establishing view corridors in the downtown with height limits to protect views of the North Shore Mountains. These guidelines have succeeded in preserving mountain views, although some find Vancouver's skyline flat and lacking in visual interest. Many agree that there is a need for some taller buildings to reflect Vancouver's contemporary image, but others are concerned about proposals for much higher buildings. Many believe that the natural setting, and in particular, views of the North Shore Mountains, may be hindered as tall buildings grow in number. In response to these concerns, Council commissioned a "Skyline Study" in 1997.[109]

The Skyline Study concluded that Vancouver's skyline would benefit from the addition of a handful of buildings exceeding current height limits, to add visual interest to Vancouver's skyline. This led to the General Policy on Higher Buildings. The study noted that the opportunities for such buildings were restricted due to a limited number of large development sites in the downtown. There were at least five sites identified where buildings exceeding the 137 metres (450 ft) height limit are possible, and at least two sites in the northwest corner of the central business district where heights up to 122 metres (400 ft) (exceeding the 91 metre/300 foot limit) might be considered.[110] Eight years later, five of the seven identified sites for higher buildings have been developed or are in the development application process. The tallest of these new buildings is the Living Shangri-La hotel/residential tower, which when completed in 2009 will stand 197 meters (646 ft)[107] tall (61 storeys).[111]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #60  
Old Posted Oct 26, 2007, 6:18 PM
Grumpy's Avatar
Grumpy Grumpy is offline
Honored Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,338
Question proposed or not ?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilbert View Post
[

- There is new renders of the 701 University :







It it a go with this building ?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.