Quote:
Originally Posted by jcchii
I know Texans don't really believe NYC exists but this is ridiculous
|
Oh hell. I think NYC was so obvious i just overlooked it. Added.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
cool start, needs major updating. Some cities conspicuously absent, others clearly have buildings above 200m.
|
Which cities would you like to see besides NYC?
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColDayMan
I hate to be that guy but it's spelled "Cincinnati."
|
Fixed
Quote:
Originally Posted by MayDay
You can bold Cleveland - two are over 200m, and Akron's tallest was completed in 1931 - not very tall but quite a handsome Art Deco tower.
|
Awesome suggestion, these cities with prewar tallests are especially interesting.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mhays
Bellevue should be 2005 and 2016 (x2) with buildings up against its 450' height limit.
Seattle might never challenge the Columbia Center, given our current FAR limits (everywhere) and height limits (nearly everywhere). Though residential doesn't count toward FAR, so that's a hope.
|
I'm suprised I forgot Bellevue, added. Seattle is an interesting one, I'll bet they could see a new one.
_____________
New additions are New York, Oakland, Bellevue,