Quote:
Originally Posted by L41A
^^^^ I agree. Underground should not be torn down.
Maybe the groundlevel (Underground) of Downtown can be re-energized with the completion of the new Atlanta Falcons stadium which is proposed to be situated on the groundlevel streets. The groundlevel streets are mainly used for parking and tailgating now. The proposed MMPT also utilizes the groundlevel streets and may even help re-energize the Underground area.
Atlanta should make a concerted effort to save as much historical structures as possible especially in that part of town. Underground is some of the most interesting history of Atlanta. Atlanta's railroad and transportation past should be celebrated more. Using hindsight, either the demolished Union Station and Terminal Station could have served as railroad museums. It's numbing to me that the Terminal Station was demolished for boxy dull RBR Federal Building (was there no other place to put that building other than where Terminal Station stood). I would hate to see something similar happen to Underground.
|
Amen, amen, & amen, especially to your second paragraph. I like that you used the word "celebrated" which is exactly what should happen to this portion of downtown, it should be celebrated not shunned. UA will never be all that it's meant to be until the immediate neighborhood is given the attention that it deserves. Here, I agree with Uptowngirl that the "city" has not done enough to care for the "heart" of the city not just referring to UA. The city must lead the way and incentivize the right type of development and retail in this portion of downtown. Perhaps even create a historic district that would encompass the UA development, the zero mile post, south Peachtree Street, and all of south downtown.
To the prospect of simply leveling the entire UA development to the ground and starting again......absolutely NOT!!! As others have stated, there are portions of UA that are historic and original and these portions must be maintained. The owner of UA should first give plenty of thought and care to programming (something lacking in the 2nd UA, i.e. "mall") and come up with a good financial model to make that programming a realty and sustainable. Hopefully, with the right programming the development would have more of an organic and native vide and feel less contrived and mall like. I still have hope for UA and south downtown. It's the historic heart of this city.