HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography


View Poll Results: Do you use filters ?
Yes 10 41.67%
No 7 29.17%
Sometimes, it depends 7 29.17%
Voters: 24. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2013, 7:27 PM
ShadowMaster's Avatar
ShadowMaster ShadowMaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,080
So how many of you use Filters for your cameras ?

Just a poll. How many of the folks here use glass filters in front of your lenses ? I see many debates about this on the net. A lot of people seem to use the filter as a form of protection for their glass while others are against it since it may cause ghosting and flare.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2013, 7:51 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,689
Depends on the filter. I ALWAYS use a UV filter at minimum on all of my lenses. If nothing else, they serve as an excellent lens protection system and also help out on those hazy, cloudy days. I definitely use a circular polarizer for most daytime work, especially in moderate to bright sunlight. I should pick up a few neutral density filters so I can better handle daytime or dawn/dusk long-exposure work as well.

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2013, 10:38 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by glowrock View Post
Depends on the filter. I ALWAYS use a UV filter at minimum on all of my lenses. If nothing else, they serve as an excellent lens protection system and also help out on those hazy, cloudy days. I definitely use a circular polarizer for most daytime work, especially in moderate to bright sunlight. I should pick up a few neutral density filters so I can better handle daytime or dawn/dusk long-exposure work as well.

Aaron (Glowrock)
I just got a ND2, ND4, and ND8 filter set. They're absolutely fantastic in the right setting and it takes a lot of the washout on those bright days too. I'm going to start a timelapse project and I guess those are essential for doing timelapses as well.. That being said, I've also botched a few photos (probably because I don't know what I'm doing) using the ND filters because they can add a layer of haze under certain conditions as well as make the sky SUPER blue.. But those are the only filters I have since the glass in front of the sensor is a UV filter already. Oh and I have a Holga lens which is an awesome effect.
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2013, 11:19 PM
Doady's Avatar
Doady Doady is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,735
UV filter I use as protection. Polarizer sometimes as well.

Make sure your filters are multicoated to avoid the flare and ghosting mentioned above.

Polariser and ND filters are the only ones that can't be replicated digitally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2013, 11:49 PM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
I just use them for protection mostly. I shoot everything in Raw so easy to save lots of stuff. Now someformofhuman is the filter master. That guy will show you how to use those things properly. I had another hipster friend that would go apeshit with old cokin filters to destroy photography. The result are usually pretty cool. He has an old cokin rainbow filter. It actually has a cheesy rainbow on it.

I actually just got some filters in the mail recently. Got a 82mm filter coming for my wide angle too. Hope it comes in soon since it has one of those curved lenses and im afraid of scratching it.
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 2:37 AM
initiald's Avatar
initiald initiald is offline
Oak City
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 4,946
Mostly just a circular polarizer. ND every now and then. I'd like to get one of those ND gradient filters for situations where you want to darken the sky but not the foreground. Anybody use one of those?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 6:19 AM
Illithid Dude's Avatar
Illithid Dude Illithid Dude is offline
Paramoderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Monica / New York City
Posts: 3,021
I'm going to start. I've recently gotten a few scratches on the front element of my lenses. These are very very fine scratches, and have no effect on my pictures, but I don't want to risk getting more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 6:28 AM
photoLith's Avatar
photoLith photoLith is offline
Ex Houstonian
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pittsburgh n’ at
Posts: 15,494
Nope, no filters for me.
__________________
There’s no greater abomination to mankind and nature than Ryan Home developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 12:51 PM
initiald's Avatar
initiald initiald is offline
Oak City
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh
Posts: 4,946
This is what I want to get next: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/grads.htm
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 3:23 PM
JManc's Avatar
JManc JManc is offline
Dryer lint inspector
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston/ SF Bay Area
Posts: 37,934
I started upgrading to decent glass so I use them for protection as well. I use a circular polarizer on my 17-55
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 4:36 PM
Tony's Avatar
Tony Tony is offline
Super Moderator / Sr. Committee
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto, ON
Posts: 5,999
Usual not. I do have a UV filter on my main lense, maybe it's the low quality of the filter, but I swear sometimes I get some glare from it.

I do have a couple of circular polarizers, but I don't use them much anymore.
__________________
Hunan, China 1 | Hunan, China 2 | Hong Kong | NYC 2 | NYC 1 | Florence | Venice | Rome | London | Paris


Flickr®
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 4:50 PM
i_am_hydrogen i_am_hydrogen is offline
tilted & shifted
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,608
There's a lot of debate over whether UV filters are necessary. I don't use them.
__________________
flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 7:26 PM
ShadowMaster's Avatar
ShadowMaster ShadowMaster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 1,080
I had purchased uv filters (cheaper 10-25$) for a lot of the lenses that I own but recently stop using them. Was a habit since I started buying more expensive equipment besides the basic point and shoots, and that was only because it was 'recommended' on some blogs and stores.

Noticed a difference in contrast and flare/glare and ghosting being absent after removal. The hood works and also keeping the cap on when not in use. Also can carry a small lens-pen in the bag if you are worried.

The special effect and polarizing filters would make more sense. Also is you are going to a environment like a beach or something.

Over at DigitalRev they had made a video on this subject -

Video Link


Funny guy with good reviews, luv his shows.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 5, 2013, 9:18 PM
big T's Avatar
big T big T is offline
Give us a kiss
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: mtl
Posts: 1,248
as was mentionned UV filters are useless for UV filtering on digital. as for using them for protection, my personal experience is a UV filter tends to be more detrimental to picture quality than a few scratches on the lens front element - scratches there are so far out of focus that it takes a reasonable amount to start affecting sharpness, whereas reflections due to filters can show up way more dramatically.

i do use a circlar polarizer for daytime landscape. i also experimented with handmade 'cutout' filters to get odd-shaped boked (star-shaped mostly), can be neat for novelty portraits.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2013, 9:12 PM
volguus zildrohar's Avatar
volguus zildrohar volguus zildrohar is offline
I Couldn't Tell Anyone
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The City Of Philadelphia
Posts: 15,988
I started using them last fall but need to purchase a couple more now that I've got more lenses to work with.

The UV and CPL are always on but admittedly they're cheap and I need to get better ones. That said they definitely make a difference. I've only used the ND8 a handful of times.
__________________
je suis phillytrax sur FLICKR, y'all
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2013, 10:56 PM
diskojoe's Avatar
diskojoe diskojoe is offline
3rd Coast King
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,671
Believe in the (cokin) Rainbow!
__________________
Photo Threads
Flickr
Facebook

My Book
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2013, 8:45 AM
SLC Projects's Avatar
SLC Projects SLC Projects is offline
Bring out the cranes...
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 6,108
still do.
__________________
1. "Wells Fargo Building" 24-stories 422 FT 1998
2. "LDS Church Office Building" 28-stories 420 FT 1973
3. "111 South Main" 24-stories 387 FT 2016
4. "99 West" 30-stories 375 FT 2011
5. "Key Bank Tower" 27-stories 351 FT 1976
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2013, 5:20 PM
novaCJ novaCJ is offline
Stuck in the Suburbs
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Virginia (DC Suburbs)
Posts: 360
No filters, although I can't even if I want to since I just use a simple point-and-shoot.
__________________
"The pessimist complains about the wind. The optimist expects it to change. The realist adjusts the sails."
-William A. Ward
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted Apr 1, 2013, 10:44 PM
flar's Avatar
flar flar is offline
..........
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 15,184
I don't use a filter for protection (I always use hoods).


There have been many occasions where I've wished I had either a neutral density or graduated filter. I have a polarizer but it doesn't fit on my main lens.

Colour filters are pretty much not necessary on digital.
__________________
RECENT PHOTOS:
TORONTOSAN FRANCISCO ROCHESTER, NYHAMILTONGODERICH, ON WHEATLEY, ONCOBOURG, ONLAS VEGASLOS ANGELES
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2013, 5:42 AM
bulliver's Avatar
bulliver bulliver is offline
So very tired...
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Penticton
Posts: 3,757
Yeah, lots of people use the UV filter as general protection, reasoning that it is better to break a $50 filter than a $300+ lens. I don't use them though, as I mostly shoot night-time long exposures and a UV filter will just cause ghosting and excess flare.

I sometimes use a circular polarizer on particularly nice blue sky days, but that's about it.
__________________
Support the mob or mysteriously disappear...
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Photography Forums > General Photography
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:20 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.