Quote:
Originally Posted by Simplicity
Please explain to the board - without using baseless qualifiers - how a profitable NHL team deserves $13MM in subsidies.
Notwithstanding the sad truth that people somehow conflate watching hockey with civic pride and their own self worth, I'd like to know how the Winnipeg Jets make us better to the tune of $13MM annually when there are many other objectively better ways we could be spending that money.
|
- The 23 players playing for the Winnipeg Jets pays income tax - $66,768,300?
- 84 flights into and out of the city by the teams. Added business to WAA? And the 42 teams coming here to stay, most of the time stays at Fairmont and likely eats at Hy's (I saw the Senators team there when I dined with my wife). The team's staff, coaches, and all that likely spends some money here. Not including playoffs
- Players such as Ladd has a house here. I'm pretty sure it's not a small $250,000 house. Some added property taxes there.
- I know that some people would say "But hey it's just money relocation, without Jets people would buy something else" but what are the chances of those money spent being trips to Bahamas? They would stay here instead and pay for seats?
- I wonder, if it wasn't for the Jets, would Mark Chipman still invest $400,000,000 on that new development he's planning?
Correct me if I'm wrong. But for me, 13M is a small investment. If it was 25M+ like Glendale or more, that would probably change my mind.