Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanight93
A lot of extra details on the dispute in one of the reddit comments (from an acquaintance of a neighbouring commercial tenant that also have transformers). Here are some interesting excerpts:
It seems that the commercial owners/tenants concern about the transformers is related to the noise/heat they produce, and as well as the space that they take-up.
The justification presented by the commercial owners/tenants for why they removed the transformers seems to be that they are 'common property', (and should be installed in a electric closet or something similar as another commenter has pointed out), but were unilaterally installed by the developer into private units without consultation with the owners. It appears that this was done as a cost-saving measure by the developer.
https://www.reddit.com/r/vancouver/c..._behind_giant/
|
I absolutely agree with them on this part.
It was bad decision-making/lack-of-foresight on the part of the developers/designers to place something of that nature within an individual unit knowing what its operation would entail, as well as the need to have it be accessible for maintainance and operation procedures.
That being said, was any or all of this information availed to the prospective tenants/owners when the units were being sold or leased out to them?
I'm willing to bet that not only was it disclosed, but that they probably got a deal, or some sort of a discount on the price on account of the fact of its presence in their units.
If you willingly buy or lease a unit knowing it has a electrical component that will need to be accessed by the strata or building management every now and again, and which you know or should be aware won't be operating silently, can you ever be justified in taking unilateral action to disable it and/or deny the strata access to your unit to operate it?