HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #61  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2012, 5:33 AM
Millennium2002 Millennium2002 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,742
Curious... is there not like a thread for the Enbridge Gateway pipeline? I understand that the topic is rather controversial, but that shouldn't mean it just "doesn't exist". Just my thought.

In any case, I don't know if this is true, but apparently due to the recent budget bill, CBC reports that a deadline for the pipeline decision has been set for the end of next year, and that a decision will come about six months after. But anyway, that wasn't the surprise... instead there was one other line that caught my attention:

Quote:
Gateway pipeline deadline set amid B.C. minister's concerns
CBC News
August 3, 2012

Under the changes, the joint review panel can't reject the pipeline project for only environmental reasons.
If this statement is true, then... honestly why do a review? The board is now forced to be more partisan and biased towards the pipeline unless it can find economic or cultural reasons to block the pipeline, and both are not entirely favourable to the strong environmental risk case. They could easily say that the economic impacts are still good to BC, even though they are rather disproportionately small for the risk, and that there'll be few cultural or societal impacts to First Nations.

Basically, the status of land claims and treaties may be the only thing left that could really delay or block the project, and even then, it's likely that this determined government could attempt to coerce the nations into a treaty by suspending assistance payments.

In the end, the situation just looks more dire for the environment up in the north. And don't get me wrong: I'd like economic development in the north, but preferably of a more ethical and responsible kind, and particularly not from a company who has been implicated for negligence of maintenance in several other oil spills.

(If off topic, please move or just tell me to remove it. However the port of Kitimat is small and sort of close to Prince Rupert anyway.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #62  
Old Posted Aug 4, 2012, 6:44 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan_kuan View Post
Curious... is there not like a thread for the Enbridge Gateway pipeline? I understand that the topic is rather controversial, but that shouldn't mean it just "doesn't exist". Just my thought.

In any case, I don't know if this is true, but apparently due to the recent budget bill, CBC reports that a deadline for the pipeline decision has been set for the end of next year, and that a decision will come about six months after. But anyway, that wasn't the surprise... instead there was one other line that caught my attention:



If this statement is true, then... honestly why do a review? The board is now forced to be more partisan and biased towards the pipeline unless it can find economic or cultural reasons to block the pipeline, and both are not entirely favourable to the strong environmental risk case. They could easily say that the economic impacts are still good to BC, even though they are rather disproportionately small for the risk, and that there'll be few cultural or societal impacts to First Nations.

Basically, the status of land claims and treaties may be the only thing left that could really delay or block the project, and even then, it's likely that this determined government could attempt to coerce the nations into a treaty by suspending assistance payments.

In the end, the situation just looks more dire for the environment up in the north. And don't get me wrong: I'd like economic development in the north, but preferably of a more ethical and responsible kind, and particularly not from a company who has been implicated for negligence of maintenance in several other oil spills.

(If off topic, please move or just tell me to remove it. However the port of Kitimat is small and sort of close to Prince Rupert anyway.)
First the CBC report - the panel no longer has the power to reject projects outright, with no cabinet override. I am not sure this is as much of a change as environmentalists would have you believe - the cabinet used its reserve powers 2 years ago to reject the Prosperity Mine in BC. That being said, that was a standard Environmental Assesment, not one partially covered by the National Energy Board.

Well, the question is fundamentally about risk. So are any risks born not ameliorated by current levels of regulation and corporate responsibility? Are there risks of imposing costs on BC taxpayers?

I would say no, or that if current liability limits are too low, they can be changed. There is little precendence for compensating against a risk where the compensation is mainly against possible future costs of mental anguish, not actual costs. If BC wants a fund or bond that could be drawn upon in case of a large scale issue, that would revert back to shareholders when the pipeline is decommissioned that is somewhat reasonable.

As for jurisdictional issues, besides the duty to consult with First Nations (which is not a duty to seek approval) the BC government's hand is very very weak. The federal government can easily declare the project of national importance (in fact, by having the NEB do the review and the BC government sign off on the joint review panel the BC government has already put the Federal government in the driver's seat).The federal government can put anything under federal control if they want. They have in the past, look at short line railways, telecommunications and the nuclear industry. The federal government can use its constitutional powers to move regulation of works related to the pipeline which are under the provincial government to under the federal unbrella (like local hydro connections, forestry permits).

No need to 'punish' BC through some realpolitik to force the province to allow something to happen. Only BC openly defying the courts, which would be unprecedented and is incredibly unlikely, could lead to odd federal-provincial interaction.

Oil is a fungible good, that is relatively easy to move around. BC does not have any powers that could stop a freight car of bitumen from going to Prince Rupert. BC does not have any powers to stop a company from building a terminal to load said bitumen onto tankers at a federally regulated port.

The price advantages of shipping to the pacific rim are so huge there is little way to stop it. The pipeline is the safest way to do so. If it, or similar pipelines are not approved, the railways will likely undergo a massive expansion to move the same product in a different way. There is already a trade in oil this way from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #63  
Old Posted Sep 12, 2012, 11:31 PM
Mitchapalooza Mitchapalooza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
More MAJOR project developments for Prince Rupert BC Area with latest news updates

Pinnacle Renewable Energy - Westview Pellet Terminal
Cost: $45 Million

Latest News Update
August 31,2012 - The Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA) announced today that the environmental assessment of the Westview Terminal Redevelopment Project proposed by Pinnacle Renewable Energy Group (Pinnacle) is complete, and the project has been approved. PRPA has made the approval subject to strong mitigation and enforcement measures designed to ensure the operation fulfills its environmental, health and safety performance requirements.

About This Project
Pinnacle Renewable Energy Group, the longest established pellet producer in Western Canada has recently announced plans to construct and operate a $45 million wood pellet receiving, storage and shipping facility in Prince Rupert. Pinnacle Renewable Energy Group owns and operates six pellet plants across British Columbia with a production capacity well over one million tons annually.

The proposed Westview Terminal wood pellet shipping facility will be designed specifically to receive wood pellets transported by rail from production facilities in the interior of British Columbia, to store wood pellets in storage silos and to load wood pellets into bulk cargo vessels bound for overseas markets. It includes the construction of private rail storage tracks, wood pellet receiving and unloading building installation of conveyor and ship loader system and at full build out pellet storage will be provided by up to seven silos, two of which will be constructed in 2012.

This state of the art terminal will be able to unload eight rail cars per hour, approximately 1,000 tonnes per hour and will have storage capacity for 60,000 tonnes following the first phase. Once operational the Westview Terminal will be able to accommodate Panamax class vessels up to 75,000 DWT (deadweight tonnes) with a loading rate of 2,000 tonnes per hour.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Canpotex Terminals Inc - Ridley Island Potash Terminal
Cost: $800 Million

Latest News Update
Canpotex terminal in Prince Rupert enters final public comment period

By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: September 07, 2012 9:00 AM
Updated: September 07, 2012 9:50 AM

The proposed Canpotex terminal in Prince Rupert continues moving forward, with the comprehensive study being released and the final public comment period beginning on September 7.

The 87-page comprehensive study proposes land clearing and construction of the terminal starting in the second quarter of 2014 with work being done on the terminal in the fourth quarter of 2017 and operations commencing in 2017 as well. The terminal calls for dock and marine infrastructure to receive 180,000 tonne vessels, a 180,000 tonne potash storage building with conveyor and dust collection system, an automated railcar unloading and conveyor system and buildings for administration, maintenance, personnel in addition to site services like water and hydro.

About This Project
Canpotex is currently working toward the completion of a feasibility analysis. This analysis covers environmental assessment, First Nations consultation and detailed design engineering activities. The company hopes to have regulatory approvals before the end of 2012.

The Canpotex Potash Export Terminal will include the following components:

■A marine wharf, access trestle, causeway and all weather ship loading facility capable of receiving vessels of up to 180,000 dead weight tonne (DWT)
■A 180,000 tonne potash storage building with associated conveyor and dust collection systems
■An automated railcar unloading and conveyor system
■A settlement pond for storm water and wash down water
■Administration, personnel, maintenance, and storage buildings
■Site services including water supply, natural gas and sewage.

The Canpotex Potash Export Terminal will have the capacity to provide an annual throughput of approximately 12.5 million tones of red potash and approximately 500,000 tonnes of white potash, a total of 13 million tonnes per year.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRPA - Ridley Island Road, Rail & Utility Expansion
Cost: $300 Million

Latest News Update
February 23, 2012 -
The federal Minister of International Trade and the Asia-Pacific Gateway announced that it will be investing $15-million in the port's Railway Corridor project on Ridley Island.

Fast says that the fast-paced growth of the Port of Prince Rupert and expectations of future demand from China for energy makes the investment in infrastructure that will help to increase capacity at the coal terminal a good idea. Fast says that this will have benefits for the entire country.

“The Asia Pacific Gateway is about all of Canada; its a pan-Canadian strategy . . . Prince Rupert and the Asia-Pacific Gateway part of that strategy are at the forefront of Pacific trade and critical to our country's long-term prosperity. So the railway corridor project shows our commitment to moving that agenda forward,” said Fast at a gathering in Prince Rupert.

And the money will certainly move the project forward. The $15-million promised by Fast for the corridor represents the last piece of the puzzle when it comes to funding the $90-million project.

Both the Port of Prince Rupert and CN Rail are putting up $30-million each and Christy Clark came to Prince Rupert last September to announce a $15-million investment on behalf of the Province.

The Road Rail Utility Corridor will add two additional tracks to forma a loop around most of Ridley Island as well as another one that branch off from the loop towards the Ridley Terminals building. On top of that electric, road and water utility extensions “to help develop 1000 acres of deep-sea terminals.”

“This project is more important than ever, not only has coal seen record exports out of Canada's northern gateway, but there is also great potential to increase these shipments and allow for other commodities to be exported,” says Minister Fast.

The CEO of the Prince Rupert Port Authority says the investment shows how Prince Rupert is has become crucial to the country's future trade opportunities.

“In order for Canada to capitalize on that opportunity (China's need for energy security), there is going to be a lot of work that is going to be required. There's going to be a need to develop port infrastructure and ocean infrastructure to meet the demand that coming our way for trade with Asia. The spotlight is on this port and on this community to be the solution for Canadian trade,” says Krusel.

The mayor of the District of Port Edward. Dave MacDonald says that the federal investment is welcome news to him and to his community.

“I think it's great. We needed the feds on-side and as I always say: anything good for Ridley is good for Port Edward. So I'm looking forward to seeing that shovel in the ground.”

Now that all the funding is lined-up , the port authority says that construction is expected to begin sometime later this year to be completed in 2014.


About This Project
The project will be constructed to include an access road, rail loop, utilities, onshore terminal infrastructure and marine components.The completion of this project will act as a catalyst for further developments at the Ridley Island Industrial Park. By providing vehicle and rail access as well as basic utilities to prospective users, the Prince Rupert Port Authority will be able to attract investments consistent with the 2020 Gateway Vision

The first phase of The Road Rail Utilitity Corridor Project at Ridley Island consists of three inbound and two outbound tracks for coal, potash and other bulk terminal developments, two additional tracks that form a loop around the main part of Ridley Island and one new track that extends off the rail loop towards Ridley Terminals.

The full build out of the Ridley Island road, rail and utility corridor will consist of:

■The access road will be two lanes wide paralleling the rail lop and include an overpass at the northwest corner of the loop and an underpass at the southern end of the loop. The overpass and underpass will provide vehicle access to the potash terminal, lands within the rail loop, and lands at the south end of the island.

■A new approximately 3.4 km 69 kV powerline, owned by the PRPA, connecting Ridley Island and proposed development sites to the existing power transmission system.
■An approximately 7,818 m rail loop corridor with capacity for 14 inbound tracks and 11 outbound tracks.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maher Terminals/PRPA - Fairview Container Terminal - Phase 2 Expansion
Cost: $650 Million

Latest News Update
September 12, 2012 - ...With five years at the terminal now in the past, Krusel anticipates even more success going forward.

“We are in the final stages of working with Maher Terminals on the commencement of construction that would take Fairview Terminal to a 1.2 million to 1.3 million TEU capacity...There is no indication that the growth in the next five years will be interrupted, and the challenge now is to manage that growth,” he said.

“The success of the past five years has set the stage for dramatic expansion of volume through Prince Rupert for other commodities. I see an exciting future for Fairview Terminal, but I see an even more exciting future for the port of Prince Rupert.”

About This Project
www.investnorthwestbc.ca
After successfully converting the former Fairview Terminal from a general cargo facility to a state of the art container handling facility, container vessels commenced calling the Prince Rupert Container Terminal in October of 2007. While ample capacity remains at the current Prince Rupert Container Terminal, plans are already underway to expand the existing facility to the north and/or south. This project represents an estimated $650 million capital expansion plan that will see the extension of the wharf to 800 metres maintaining a 17-metre minimum water depth, increasing the dock area to 165 acres, double the number of super post-Panamax cranes and create an additional 725 person years of employment. The expanded facility would have an on-site storage capacity of 25,000 TEUs and accommodate the continued growth in regional export traffic anticipated to develop over the next decade. Plans also include construction of a new industrial access road, alongside the existing CN rail line, between Fairview Terminal and Ridley Island. Along with increased storage capacity Phase 2 will see an increase of capacity from 500,000 TEU's annually to 2,000,000 TEU’s annually, meeting the demands of continued growth in Asia Pacific traffic trade.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spectra Energy/BG Gas - 850km Natural Gas Pipeline to Prince Rupert
Cost: $6-8 Billion

Latest News Update
September 10, 2012 -

After BG Group expressed interest in creating a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal in Prince Rupert earlier this year, another big-name in the LNG industry has committed interest to creating a new natural gas transportation system that would serve the terminal.

If the project went through the transportation system would begin in northeast B.C. and would end at BG Group’s potential LNG export facility in Prince Rupert. The transportation system would be approximately 850-kilometres and would be capable of transporting up to 4.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day.

The Spectra Energy Corporation and BG Group have signed a Project Development Agreement to develop plans together, with both companies agreeing to have equal ownership interest in the project. Spectra Energy would be responsible of constructing and operating the transportation system, and BG Group has agreed to contract for all of the proposed capacity.

“We have been working with BG Group in development of this project for the better part of a year. We’ve got to know them quite well and see them as a very major player that intends to make a very major difference in the LNG market,” said Doug Bloom, president of Spectra Energy Transmission West in an exclusive interview with the Prince Rupert Northern View.

David Byford, spokesman of BG Group in Texas, says that the project is still in the feasibility phase, although they have narrowed their focus to a site on Ridley Island in Prince Rupert.

“We believe [Ridley Island] is an ideal site for a potential LNG facility. It benefits from road and rail access as well as a coastal location and proximity to existing Asia-Pacific markets,” Byford told the Prince Rupert Northern View.

In its announcement, Spectra is assuring that the proposed natural gas line will include not only current standards but also state-of-the-art safety measures.

“We’re very familiar with the technology and terrain in British Columbia. This pipeline we’re designing will use all the latest materials and most current and advance construction techniques. We think it will be very safe and reliable for decades to come,” Bloom assured.

Bloom also believes that communities along the proposed route, and the province will better receive the project than Enbridge’s Northern Gateway oil pipeline.

“I think people ascribe more risk to the environment as a result of oil lines than they do to gas lines,” he said.

Additionally, Spectra estimates that over 4,000 jobs would be created in British Columbia during the construction phase of the project, with around 50 to 60 permanent jobs being created in the company’s portion of the project.

Early conceptual routes have been developed, however Spectra Energy and BG Group will continue to engage with stakeholders, including Aboriginal and local communities, environmental organizations and regulatory agencies to further refine the route.

After further work with stakeholders, project construction is expected to start in 2015, with service starting before 2020.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BG Gas - Ridley Island LNG Terminal
Cost: $4-6 Billion

Latest News Update
September 10, 2012 -
An 850-kilometre gas supply pipeline announced Monday is a key component in a proposed BG Group PLC liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility at Prince Rupert, B.C., that could result in the investment of “tens of billions” of dollars.

Reached at his recently opened Vancouver office — so new he had to look up the phone number — Steve Swaffield, acting president of BG Canada, said the U.K.-based gas-handling major is actively studying the feasibility of constructing a two-train LNG export facility to open by 2019 on a site on Ridley Island with access to a deepwater port.

The project would involve building the pipeline as well as signing upstream supply agreements or asset purchases.

“I think the total to develop the entire value chain would be in the tens of billions,” he said in an interview with the Herald.

Earlier this year, BG confirmed it had an option to develop an 80-hectare section of land on the Ridley industrial development site, owned by the Prince Rupert Port Authority.

On Monday, Houston-based Spectra Energy Corp. announced that it has signed a deal with BG to consider building a large diameter natural gas pipeline capable of bringing 4.2 billion cubic feet per day from northeastern B.C. to Prince Rupert.

No price tag was given but industry sources and analysts pegged the cost at between $6 billion and $8 billion.

Swaffield wouldn’t be specific on how much it might cost to develop its projects but said Australian projects provide some guidance. In 2010, BG sanctioned the two-train, 8.5-million-tonnes-per-year (about 1.1 billion cubic feet per day) Queensland Curtis project, in which it planned to invest $15 billion for liquefaction plant, wells, field facilities and pipelines. The project is to begin shipping LNG in 2014 and can be expanded to a third train.

Swaffield said the intention is that the entire contents of the Spectra pipeline would supply its LNG export terminal. The line would be built in phases and would be 50 per cent owned by each party,

He said BG has no Canadian upstream gas assets at the moment but is confident that there will be enough supply to fill the pipeline and export facilities when they come on stream after four and half to five years of construction.

A final sanctioning decision is expected in late 2015.

About This Project
The Prince Rupert Port Authority has engaged with the British Gas Group to consider Prince Rupert for a potential LNG terminal that could be used to load Western Canadian gas onto ships bound for consumers in Japan, South Korea and China. BG is a leading player in the global energy market with operations in more than 25 countries over five continents.

The North Coast has emerged as the favoured West Coast location to access Asia's markets for oil and gas, and millions of dollars of investments are already flowing in the region with several LNG projects planned in Kitimat BC.

BG has secured access to a 200-acre section of land on the Ridley industrial development site, owned by the Prince Rupert Port Authority.The Prince Rupert Port Authority has given the BG Group a period of time to conduct the feasibility and suitability study, and if it is determined to be viable then further development will proceed.

To serve the proposed terminal BG has signed a Project Development Agreement with Spectra Energy Corp for a new natural gas transportation system from northeast B.C. to Prince Rupert. The approximately 850-kilometre (525 mile), large diameter natural gas transportation system will begin in northeast B.C. and end at BG Group’s potential LNG export facility in Prince Rupert. The new transportation system will be capable of transporting up to 4.2 billion cubic feet per day of natural gas. The project also will connect with the Spectra Energy system at Station 2 (southwest of Fort St. John), a growing natural gas hub that collects supply from multiple areas of the province and other supply basins in Western Canada.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Petronas Gas - Lelu Island LNG Terminal
Cost: $4 Billion

Latest News Update
June 28, 2012: Petronas, one of the world's largest producers and shippers of LNG, struck a deal to acquire Calgary’s based Progress Energy Resources Corp. for $5.5-billion. At the same time Petronas and Progress announced Port Edward, BC, near Prince Rupert, as the location for their planned export terminal for liquefied natural gas (LNG).

About This Project
The Petronas-Progress LNG Project has engaged with the Prince Rupert Port Authority (PRPA) to conduct feasibility and investigative studies for a potential LNG plant on Lelu Island. The plant would be used to produce and load LNG from the companies’ Northeast British Columbia gas fields onto ships bound for consumers in the Asia Pacific.

Petronas is one of the world's leading LNG companies and is fully involved in every value chain of the LNG business, from liquefaction and shipping to re-gasification and trading. Progress Energy is a Canadian company that has been operating in Northeast BC for years.

The project has begun engagement with the PRPA, other relevant authorities and First Nations, as well as community groups, and will begin its investigation to understand the environmental and social impacts as well as ascertaining technical feasibility.

If the project proceeds the plant is anticipated to begin operation by 2019 and is being designed to process up to 1.2 billion cubic feet of gas a day, with an estimated shipping capacity of 7.4 million tonnes a year. As part of this project various pipeline options are being examined to build a link to the LNG facility from the Northeast BC gas fields.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ridley Terminals Inc - Coal Terminal Expansion at Ridley Island
Cost: $200 Million

Latest News Update
March 28, 2012 - Construction at Ridley Terminals continues at a steady pace as the capacity realization project enters its second year of development. The first year included the installation of two dumper barrels in December 2011, which marked the first actualized capacity growth at the terminal since it was commissioned in 1983. 2011's planned works wrapped up when Arctic Construction finished clearing 44 acres of additional lands for improvement. The second year will involve site civil works, upgrades of the existing stacker/reclaimers, delivery of a third stacker/reclaimer, installation of additional conveyance, and installation and upgrade of nearly 14 km of rail infrastructure. After a competitive bidding process Adventure Paving of Prince Rupert, BC was awarded the contract for the site civil works. They mobilized and began work mid-March. Sandvik will be delivering the new stacker/reclaimer in November 2012. In 2013 construction will continue with the integration of new lands into the existing operation. In 2014 a new tandem rotary dumper and a new thaw shed will be added to the Terminal's operation, doubling total terminal capacity from the initial 12 Mt/y. The Ridley Terminals capacity realization project is scheduled to be complete by the end of 2014.

About This Project
Ridley Terminals Inc., a federal crown corporation, owns and operates the most advanced coal unload and loading terminal in North America. Its currently has an annual shipping capacity of 12 million tonnes and storage capacity of 1.2 million tonnes. Ridley Terminals Inc has secured long term contracts with major coal producers in North America that has helped them nearly reach their current capacity. The modifications that are being made throughout the multi-phase project will allow RTI to increase annual shipping capacity from 12 million tonnes to 24 million tonnes by 2015. As a result, an additional 20-25 permanent jobs will be available at the terminal, along with many other employment opportunities through contract work.

An environmental assessment has been completed for the project and construction began in late August 2011. The terminal modifications will occur in four stages of development, with an expected completion by early 2015. The cost of the project is approximately $200 million.

The first phase of development involved site preparation of 44 acres of land, and replacement of two dumper barrels. The second phase will involve site civil works, refurbishing and upgrading of two existing stacker/reclaimers, adding a third stacker/reclaimer, and the installation and upgrade of existing rail lines. The third phase includes the installation of a fourth stacker/reclaimer, as well as adding and extending existing conveyor lines. The fourth phase of development adds a new dumper and a new thaw shed to the Terminal's operation.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WatCo Development Corp - Watson Island Industrial Site Re-Development
Cost: $50-150 Million

Latest News Update
August 1, 2012 - Watson Island Development Corporation (WatCo) confirmed today that it has presented an offer to purchase the former Skeena Cellulose pulp mill properties in Prince Rupert and Port Edward.

About This Project
Prince Rupert and Port Edward have accepted a conditional offer from Watco to purchase the former pulp mill site, a site which the communities acquired through a tax sale process. Watco is a venture made up of Metlakatla First Nation, Lax Kw'alaams First Nation, Colonial Coal and Hillsborough Resources. Sale conditions include the development, approval and funding of a remediation plan for the land, which is contaminated as a result of decades of pulp mill operation. WatCo has offered to fund the planning process and make a significant contribution to the cleanup, pending provincial government approval.

Watco has purchased the property to develop a seaport terminal and industrial park. The eventual re-development of this industrial property will be a huge benefit to the economies of Prince Rupert and Port Edward. Currently there is a need in the Northwest British Columbia to invest in Industrial Land Developments. Demand for such lands is growing most notably in response to the expanding opportunities arising from the increasing transportation and logistics industry in Prince Rupert driven by the increased traffic at the Port of Prince Rupert.

The redevelopment of this site offer a unique opportunity for Watco and the communities. This site has the advantages of having transportation infrastructure in place in terms of rail, ocean and road access and could host a variety of potential uses. The redevelopment and re-use of Watson Island could contribute economic and social benefits that include: increased tax revenues at all levels of government, community revitalization, business opportunities, economic development, and new employment opportunities.
www.investnorthwestbc.ca
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #64  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 3:17 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 11,521
Good god. That's a lot of investment. PR is most definitely going to be BC newest 'big' metro area in the next 25 years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #65  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 6:28 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,829
I honestly hope all this goes through, this could be the start of Prince Rupert's long awaited boom. I would love to have a 100 000 + community on the north coast of BC.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #66  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 5:24 PM
Mitchapalooza Mitchapalooza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
I honestly hope all this goes through, this could be the start of Prince Rupert's long awaited boom. I would love to have a 100 000 + community on the north coast of BC.
If all of the above projects are realized - that equates to a $16-20 Billion dollar investment in Prince Rupert by the start of 2020.

Full-time jobs = 2000 to 3000 full-time (thats a very frugal estimate, numbers floating around the city are much higher)
Multi year construction jobs = 10,000+

That doesn't include spinoff or indirect jobs.

There is also plans for construction of a 2nd container terminal on the western harbour side of the city, under Fairview's Phase 3 expansion in 2020. These plans would add an additional 2,000,000 TEU and 1500 jobs, with over $1 Billion of capital investment.

There are also confirmed reports that two other gas companies are (one is rumored to be Exxonn Mobil) going to be building LNG terminals on the Northwest Coast (so either Kitimat or Prince Rupert). The likelihood would be a PR location as there is much more industrial land available in the area and the city is closer to Asian markets than the Port of Kitimat, not to mention they have an unobstructed open harbour to the Pacific.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #67  
Old Posted Sep 13, 2012, 5:49 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,439
Not all the LNG terminals will go forward, there just isn't enough suppy. Of the ones that do go forward, I wouldn't be surprised to see them mostly built offshore substaintially reducing the construction workforce.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #68  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2012, 6:46 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert Port Authority on track for a record-breaking year
By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: October 10, 2012 11:50 AM
Updated: October 10, 2012 11:50 AM

With just three months to go until the calendar turns over to 2013, the Prince Rupert Port Authority is on track for another record breaking year.

Traffic through Fairview Terminal was up 17 per cent this September compared to last September, sitting at 52,994 TEUs compared to 45,424, while so far this year there have been 47 per cent more TEUs moving through Prince Rupert, jumping from 287,059 TEUs to 421,641 TEUs.That number is just shy of the 500,000 TEU initial capacity the terminal was designed for.

Imports were up 20 per cent this September, sitting at 29,877 TEUs, and so far this year imports are up 45 per cent, jumping from 164,539 to 238,434.

Exports are up 13 per cent this September compared to last, but the number of loaded TEUs moving through Prince Rupert is actually down 14 per cent while the number of empty TEUs is up 45 per cent. For the year-to-date, exports are up 50 per cent, sitting at 183,207, with the number of loaded containers being shipped out up 28 per cent and the number of empty containers leaving Prince Rupert up 80 per cent.

After a record 2011, Ridley Terminals is also on track for a record breaking year. In September the tonnage handled by the terminal was up 56 per cent, sitting at 848,150 tonnes compared to 543,376 tonnes in 2011, while so far this year the terminal is up 20 per cent, with 8.48 million tonnes being moved in 2012 compared to 7.1 million tonnes in 2011.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/173313641.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #69  
Old Posted Nov 9, 2012, 5:15 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert Port Authority on track for record year despite challenging October
By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: November 08, 2012 5:44 PM
Updated: November 08, 2012 5:44 PM

The Prince Rupert Port Authority continues its push to another record year, despite a rough October for many of the terminals.

Fairview Terminal was up 22 per cent this October compared to last October, with 50,721 TEUs moving through the terminal compared to 41,465 last October, while so far this year Fairview is up 44 per cent compared to last year. Imports through the terminal were up 14 per cent compared to last October, with 26,816 TEUs being handled, and so far imports in 2012 are up 41 per cent compared to the first 10 months of 2011, with 265,250 TEUs coming ashore compared to 188,046 last year.

While exports were up this October compared to last, the number of empty containers being shipped out was 84 per cent while the number of loaded containers leaving Prince Rupert was down five per cent, falling from 10,216 TEUs to 9,661 TEUs.

So far this year the number of loaded TEUs being exported is up 24 per cent compared to the first 10 months of 2011, but this is the fourth month in a row that loaded exports through Prince Rupert have fallen. In July year-to-date loaded containers being shipped out were up42.8 per cent while July 2012 numbers were down 12,2 per cent compared to July 2011. In August the year-over-year numbers were down 1.2 per cent, in September the year-over-year exports were down 14 per cent, and this October saw five per cent fewer containers being shipped out of Fairview Terminal. The Prince Rupert Port Authority is still analyzing possible reasons for the decline.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/177895181.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #70  
Old Posted Dec 15, 2012, 5:22 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert coal terminal to be sold by federal government
Move reverses Harper's 2006 decision to keep Ridley Terminals

CBC News
Posted: Dec 14, 2012 8:05 AM PT

The federal government has decided to sell off the Crown-owned Ridley Terminals in Prince Rupert, a key asset in B.C.'s growing coal export industry.

Minister of State for Finance Ted Menzies says the decision to sell the terminals was part of the government's review of its corporate assets.

Ridley Terminals handles bulk exports of coal and other commodities, mostly to Asia. It is considered a world leader in transferring cargo from railcars to large ships for export.

In 2006, as one of his first acts as prime minister, Stephen Harper halted plans by the previous Liberal government to sell the terminals to an Ontario mining company.

The government says the Ridley Terminals recorded losses in four of five years leading up to 2006 and has required millions in financial support to get it operating properly again.

Last year, the terminals broke records in revenues, profits and volume. It signed 11 new contracts and reduced its debt by 70 per cent.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/britis...-for-sale.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #71  
Old Posted Dec 29, 2012, 12:18 AM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert mayor reflects on 2012, looks ahead to 2013
By Martina Perry - The Northern View
Published: December 28, 2012 9:00 AM
Updated: December 28, 2012 10:19 AM

With 2012 now in the history books, Prince Rupert Mayor Jack Mussallem was optimistic while speaking with the Prince Rupert Northern View about the past year’s highlights and the year to come.

Mussallem considers successes in Prince Rupert’s industrial sector as a highlight in 2012, mentioning the Prince Rupert Port Authority’s “banner year”.

“Prince Rupert is being recognized more and more for the opportunities the port provides importers and exporters of products,” he said.

Mussallem said more Rupertities getting hired at port operations, such as the additional longshore hiring in the spring, has been a highlight in 2012.

“There’s some optimism in the community as more expansion is expected in coming years,” Mussallem said.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/185064121.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #72  
Old Posted Mar 9, 2013, 4:16 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Construction of $90-million Road, Rail and Utility Corridor at Port of Prince Rupert Will Support Billions in New Terminal Developments and Increase Canadian Trade Capacity and Exports to Asia-Pacific Markets
FRIDAY, MARCH 8, 2013 | VIEW AS PDF

PRINCE RUPERT, BRITISH COLUMBIA -- A groundbreaking at the Port of Prince Rupert today marked the start of construction of the port's $90-million Road, Rail and Utility Corridor project, which will support billions in new terminal developments and boost Canada's trade capacity and exports to fast-growing Asia-Pacific markets.

The Road, Rail and Utility Corridor will be a catalyst for significant terminal developments being advanced through private sector investment on the Ridley Island Industrial Site at the Port of Prince Rupert. The project includes construction of five parallel rail tracks, a two-lane roadway, and a port-owned power distribution system along an eight-kilometre corridor. This will provide shared-use infrastructure for proposed potash, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and other terminals on the island. The capital costs of the terminal developments are currently estimated in the billions of dollars. The first phase of the project will be completed in December 2014.
http://www.rupertport.com/news/relea...ruction-begins

Quote:
Work underway on $90-million road, rail and utility corridor in Prince Rupert
By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: March 08, 2013 5:11 PM
Updated: March 08, 2013 5:12 PM

Work on the Ridley Island Road, Rail and Utility Corridor kicked off with a groundbreaking ceremony on March 8.

Phase one of the $90 million project includes the construction of an eight kilometre loop of five rail tracks, a two-lane road and port-owned hydro lines. The result will be opening up 400 hectares of industrial land on the island for projects like the Canpotex potash terminal and BG Group LNG export terminal.

"This isn't just something for the people of Prince Rupert or the region, projects like this are critical for us as a province and as a nation. As trade with Asia grows, B.C. needs to lead the way," said Minister of Infrastructure Mary Polak, noting that competition is fierce among west coast ports.

"This brings us into the realm of competition... This is one more way we see Prince Rupert as becoming the top of the chain."

Funding for the project came in the form of $30 million apiece from the Prince Rupert Port Authority and CN Rail and $15 million apiece from the provincial and federal governments. The 90 workers needed for the project, however, will be mostly comprised of First Nations from Lax Kw'alaams and Metlakatla.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/196629751.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #73  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2013, 11:46 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Traffic at Prince Rupert's Fairview Terminal up slightly, Port Authority up 31 per cent this year
Published: April 06, 2013 7:00 AM

While Ridley Terminals recorded its second highest monthly volume in the terminal's history in March, Fairview Terminal saw a sharp year-over-year decline.

This March the container terminal handled 35,424 TEUs compared to 52,284 last March, a drop of 32 per cent. Imports last month were down 43 per cent compared to 2012 numbers, while exports were down 19 per cent.

"The moderate volume decrease at Fairview Terminal in March was attributed to both the timing of the Chinese New Year holidays whereby container lines consolidated loading in Asia to pre and post-holiday services, and CN Rail experiencing some winter operating issues attributed to an extended cold period in the prairies that resulted in railcar shortages country-wide," said the Prince Rupert Port Authority in a statement.

"This contributed to the Port of Prince Rupert only hosting 10 container ship operations in March rather than the average 13 to 15 calls normally accommodated."

However, the terminal remains slightly ahead of last year through the first quarter. So far in 2013 there have been 134,975 TEUs pass through Prince Rupert compared to 127,785 in the first three months of 2012, a difference of six per cent. Imports are up five per cent this year, with exports up seven per cent.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/201708921.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #74  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2013, 4:30 PM
Mitchapalooza Mitchapalooza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 11
$30 Million Condo/Hotel complex announced for Prince Rupert

http://www.thenorthernview.com/break...203502141.html

Downtown Prince Rupert could soon be home to an estimated $30 million multi-use building.

The 2G Group announced on April 17 its plans to build an integrated office, hotel, apartment and restaurant complex at the site of the old Elizabeth Apartments. The project, done in partnership with the Blended Capital Group and Stuart Olson Dominion, is expected to be open next summer, but 2G Group CEO Geoff Greenwell said response has already been strong.

"We have a couple of major corporations interested in taking a significant portion of the building," he said, noting the idea is a very new one.

"A lot of this is based on feedback from people leading up to this conference... At this point it is basically tell us what you want and we will build it."

Much of the steel frame building will be built in a modular manner off the site and brought into Prince Rupert. Greenwell envisions a high end five or six story building depending on how the hearing process with city council proceeds.

"All of the companies expressed the need for high end executive residences, but also office space. They said if we're coming here, where are we going to put our managers and executives," he said.

"We want to get this up and going this year because it is a beautiful site with an amazing view."

Prince Rupert mayor Jack Mussallem said the building will fill a gap in the community's housing inventory.

"I have noted that people I have talked to on an individual basis about getting older have said they want a view, they don't want maintenance like lawn mowing and they want to come and go as they please... The demand for that type of accommodation is there," he said, noting that it bodes well for Prince Rupert's future.

"It speaks to the optimism and opportunity in Prince Rupert and the surrounding area that is driven by port development."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #75  
Old Posted Jun 26, 2013, 3:11 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert city council tells MP they are 'overwhelmed' by LNG projects
By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: June 25, 2013 8:00 AM
Updated: June 25, 2013 8:56 AM

Skeena – Bulkley Valley MP Nathan Cullen attended Prince Rupert city council on Monday night and heard firsthand the frustration of councillors when it comes to LNG growth in the region.

"We're constantly having projects coming in for assessment and we're feeling bombarded ... we don't have the capacity. Our staff are busy trying to run a city, keeping water and sewer running, and we don't have the time to get the necessary information about things like engineering," said Councillor Gina Garon who, like other councillors, expressed the need for expert advice.

"We don't have any expertise when it comes to the open houses. We go there, nod our heads and ask basic questions ... our problem is that we're so overwhelmed we can't handle the technical part of the assessment," said Councillor Joy Thorkelson.

Along with the sheer number of projects being brought to the table, council expressed concerns about how they were being looked at by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

"There is huge concern about our watershed and there is huge concern about our airshed ...if it is just one terminal maybe the watershed and the airshed can handle it. But if there are four or five plants can the watershed take it," questioned Thorkelson.

"There is no holistic look at the problem with all the projects proposed," she said.

Cullen said he was sympathetic to council's problems in dealing with multiple applications and agreed projects should not just be looked at "as though it exists in its own universe". The solution, he said, may be partnering with other municipalities and First Nations in the area to form a unified voice.

"If the federal government isn't going to look at the whole impact, it is incumbent on someone to do that. More and more it is First Nations that are taking on that role," he said.

"I would form any alliance you can with First Nations, who in a lot of cases are on the leading edge of this."
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/212962681.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #76  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2013, 5:14 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
DAILY NEWS Aug 7, 2013 3:38 PM - 0 comments
Prince Rupert adds fourth container handling crane
2013-08-07

PRINCE RUPERT, BC -- A new container handling gantry crane arrived at the Port of Prince Rupert's Fairview Container Terminal Saturday aboard the heavy cargo vessel Zheng Hua 11, concluding its 8,300-kilometre journey from manufacturer ZPMC in Shanghai, China.

The new crane brings the port's total complement of Super-Post Panamax container cranes to four. The new crane is identical to the three that were installed when the terminal opened in 2007. Each crane has a 22-container reach and weighs over 1,800 tonnes, said a port release.

"We congratulate Maher Terminals on the addition to their on-dock infrastructure," said Don Krusel, President and CEO of the Prince Rupert Port Authority. "We anticipate how this crane will sustain the strengthening of Prince Rupert's reputation for reliability and add to its capacity for container shipping."

"The arrival of a fourth crane for our container operations will further enhance our ability to quickly and efficiently turn around container vessels at Fairview Terminal. It will add to our already very strong vessel production of 31-plus moves per crane hour" said Mark Schepp, Senior Vice President of Maher Terminals, which operates the terminal. "This further underscores the commitment of Maher Terminals to our steamship line customers and the Port of Prince Rupert."
http://www.ctl.ca/news/prince-rupert...ne/1002519300/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #77  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2013, 10:06 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Port of Prince Rupert Acquires Another Crane to Compete for Panamax Ships
Posted by Content Coordinator on Friday, September 13th, 2013

Transportation Issues Daily

Last month the Port of Prince Rupert received another super crane and expanded its capability to receive Panamax ships. The Port now has four super cranes.

“The arrival of a fourth crane for our container operations will further enhance our ability to quickly and efficiently turn around container vessels at Fairview Terminal. It will add to our already very strong vessel production of 31-plus moves per crane hour” said Mark Schepp, Senior Vice President of Maher Terminals, which operates the terminal. “This further underscores the commitment of Maher Terminals to our steamship line customers and the Port of Prince Rupert.”

For years Canadian federal, provincial, port and private funding has been directed to improving and expanding infrastructure at the Ports of Vancouver and Prince Rupert. Elected officials, government agencies and business leaders are determined to increase Canada’s share of Asian imports. Part of the motivation is to increase the number of (high-paying) jobs and sustain the Canadian businesses which depend on trade. Many U.S. transportation and freight stakeholders are envious of what Canada is accomplishing.
http://www.infrastructureusa.org/port-of-prince-rupert/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #78  
Old Posted Oct 12, 2013, 5:18 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
Prince Rupert needing almost $150 million for infrastructure projects in the coming years
By Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
Published: October 12, 2013 7:00 AM
Updated: October 12, 2013 7:57 AM

The City of Prince Rupert has nearly $150 million in needed infrastructure projects in the coming years.

That was the message chief financial officer Corinne Bomben gave the Select Standing Committee on Finance and Government Services during a budget consultation meeting held in Prince Rupert on Oct. 9. Bomben outlined three major areas of concerns, the first of which has to do with how residents get their water.

"We have a 100-year-old dam and raw water supply line ... some of our redundancy pumps in the event of waterline damage are so old that the original manufacturers told us to call a museum if we need parts," she told the committee.


The second concern is one of road safety, and one that must be addressed sooner than later.



The third and final need is by far the largest – a way of keeping raw sewage out of the harbour.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/227512071.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #79  
Old Posted May 27, 2014, 5:20 PM
amor de cosmos amor de cosmos is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: lodged against an abutment
Posts: 7,556
Quote:
City of Prince Rupert discussing LNG terminal on lands across from Seal Cove
by Shaun Thomas - The Northern View
posted May 27, 2014 at 7:47 AM

The City of Prince Rupert is opening up land across from Seal Cove to a potential LNG export terminal.

At its May 26 meeting, council announced the city was in discussions with Imperial Oil and Exxon Mobile "under an investigative option" to see if a parcel of land on the Prince Rupert harbour waterfront would be suitable for such a terminal. The land in question is part of District Lot 444, which was recently acquired by the city from the province, and is on the west side of the parcel while the city's water supply rests within a watershed on the east side of the lot.

The partnership, named WCC LNG, has already been granted an export licence for 30 million tonnes of LNG per year and could see the creation of up to six LNG trains. Although the licence has been approved, council noted discussions are very preliminary.
http://www.bclocalnews.com/news/260716281.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #80  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2014, 1:16 PM
SOSS SOSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 661
Buy America policy means Alaska ferry terminal in Prince Rupert to be built with U.S. products

BY THE CANADIAN PRESS NOVEMBER 25, 2014

A request for proposals from the State of Alaska carefully spells out that the project — estimated to cost as much as US$15 million — must be built under the American legislation.

A new terminal was part of an agreement in a 50-year lease signed in 2013 between the Prince Rupert Port Authority and the Alaska Department of Highways, which operates the ferry between Prince Rupert and Alaska.

Jeremy Woodrow, a spokesman for the Alaska Marine Highway, said his department anticipated the "conundrum" of building under the Buy America policies on Canadian land and carefully worded the request with international contractors in mind.

"We normally don't list in our (request for proposals) that this is a requirement when we're building transportation projects in the U.S. because it's a well know requirement," he said, adding that the cost of American steel would have to be factored in by Canadian contractors.

"So it's a really interesting project, in the fact that we have — what is essentially a U.S. ferry terminal being built on Canadian land or Canadian waters."

Because the funding comes from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, the contact must comply with the rules, Woodrow said.

Michael Gurney, manager of corporate communications at the Prince Rupert Port Authority, said in an interview that the lease agreement didn't make any restrictions on the construction of the terminal and the port has no control or responsibility for the terminal.

"When it comes to the Alaska ferry terminal in Prince Rupert, it is owned, operated and used exclusively by the Alaska Marine Highway system. The lands on which it sits are leased from the port authority and that lease actually contains no provisions related to procurement."

The Alaska Marine Highway has been operating from the current facility since 1963.

International Trade Minister Ed Fast said he is deeply concerned about the restrictions on the Prince Rupert construction project.

"Taxpayers on both sides of the border would benefit from dismantling the trade barriers and inefficiencies created by U.S. protectionist policies such as Buy America," Fast said in a statement to The Canadian Press. "We are exploring all options to address this situation."

Fast said the situation, coming so quickly over the debacle with the bridge in Morrison, Colo., is another example of how illogical and counterproductive it is to try to segregate our economies.

The U.S. government reversed a decision in October, saying it wouldn't force the small Colorado town of Morrison to take apart a bridge that had been built with a small amount of American steel manufactured in a Canadian plant.

"The extraterritorial application of these protectionist restrictions on trade within Canada by a foreign government is unreasonable," said Fast.

Marcus Ewert-Johns, of the group Canadian Manufactures and Exporters, said the Buy America provisions mean more barriers are being built around what was supposed to be free trade between Canada and the U.S.

He suggests governments in Canada should impose similar policies to help manufacturers at home.

Ewert-Johns said the irony of the situation isn't lost on his group.

"So the U.S. is enforcing restrictive trade policies on a project. Yes it's their money, it's their terminal, but it's a terminal that exists in Canada on Canadian federal government land. It's a sour pill to have to swallow if you can't do anything about it."

The request for proposals closes on Dec. 4 and work is expected to be complete by March 2016.

-- By Terri Theodore in Vancouver
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.