HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Which rapid transit line would you like to see most?
Hastings 32 15.69%
Vancouver - Other 70 34.31%
North Shore 40 19.61%
Pitt Meadows/Maple Ridge 2 0.98%
Tsawwassen/Ferries 10 4.90%
Surrey - Guilford 16 7.84%
Surrey - Newton 11 5.39%
South Surrey/White Rock/Border 5 2.45%
Langley 10 4.90%
Abbotsford 5 2.45%
Other 3 1.47%
Voters: 204. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #241  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 6:16 PM
Dave2 Dave2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 512
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #242  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 6:29 PM
Diegotheartist1's Avatar
Diegotheartist1 Diegotheartist1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 149
I'd love to see the Expo Line being extended from Waterfront Station to the north shore via Hastings & Second Narrows. As for others, UBC and PoCo extensions are definitely a priority
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #243  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 6:43 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diegotheartist1 View Post
I'd love to see the Expo Line being extended from Waterfront Station to the north shore via Hastings & Second Narrows. As for others, UBC and PoCo extensions are definitely a priority
They're certainly ambitious plans, but not unrealistic. I really hope that there is enough support to keep moving forward with increased transit development. The SkyTrain lines have certainly proven their worth and it would be nice to be ahead of the curve (and let transit lead development) rather than have to play catch-up yet again a few decades down the road.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #244  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 6:44 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tvisforme View Post
They're certainly ambitious plans, but not unrealistic. I really hope that there is enough support to keep moving forward with increased transit development. The SkyTrain lines have certainly proven their worth and it would be nice to be ahead of the curve (and let transit lead development) rather than have to play catch-up yet again a few decades down the road.
Do you think any new Skytrain route say to the North Shore be dependent on densification or would they just keep whatever town centre OCPs as is?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #245  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 6:49 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Do you think any new Skytrain route say to the North Shore be dependent on densification or would they just keep whatever town centre OCPs as is?
Do you mean densification as is, or projected densification after rrt is built?
I think rrt anywhere causes densification where it goes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #246  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 7:18 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 9,689
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Do you mean densification as is, or projected densification after rrt is built?
I think rrt anywhere causes densification where it goes.
I just wonder how the North Shore NIMBYs will react to that aspect of rapid transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #247  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 7:21 PM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 1,437
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Do you think any new Skytrain route say to the North Shore be dependent on densification or would they just keep whatever town centre OCPs as is?
The North Shore already has some areas designated as a focus for higher density growth, and I would guess that they would keep to those plans due to the challenges posed by the terrain. The proposals for RapidBus and SkyTrain for the North Shore all seem to include areas such as central/lower Lonsdale, Lynn Valley, and Lynnmour/Maplewood as targets for stations.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I just wonder how the North Shore NIMBYs will react to that aspect of rapid transit.
You are correct in that there will be opposition to large-scale densification. However, I do feel that there is an acceptance that there may have to be compromises in order to keep the North Shore "lifestyle" that many value. By that, I mean that residents may accept RapidBus and SeaBus over ALRT if it means the growth is managed. The North Shore has been sheltered to a degree from the extremely rapid growth seen in other municipalities, but it is not entirely due to wealth or NIMBYism. Those are certainly factors, of course, but the terrain and limited access across the inlet also serve to reduce the practical level for population density. Even if we do get SkyTrain onto the North Shore, it is not practical in the near or medium future to extend rapid service across the entire land base compared to what one can do relatively easily in Burnaby or Surrey.

Last edited by Tvisforme; Apr 19, 2021 at 7:32 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #248  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 7:54 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave2 View Post
Network A (SkyTrain, RapidBus) and Network B (SkyTrain, streetcar, RapidBus).

Far as I can tell, there is absolutely nothing to warrant a streetcar on most of those extra routes - come to think of it, not much to warrant a RapidBus either.

Last edited by Migrant_Coconut; Apr 20, 2021 at 5:51 PM. Reason: Link fixed
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #249  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2021, 10:44 PM
WALKIEBRO WALKIEBRO is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Posts: 20
If Network A was fully implemented, Vancouver would have truly world class transit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #250  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 12:15 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,193
Oh wow, Network A would be a dream come true. SkyTrain along Hastings to North Shore and via Brentwood to Metrotown. Even along 41st Avenue? This is like the fantasy thread come true if this happens by 2050. They better start building!

Extension to Port Coquitlam should be so easy and cheap compared to anything else that they should just go for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #251  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 12:16 AM
chowhou's Avatar
chowhou chowhou is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: East Vancouver (No longer across the ocean!)
Posts: 2,404
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
I just wonder how the North Shore NIMBYs will react to that aspect of rapid transit.
I think for the most part this transit route avoids the NIMBYest parts of the North Shore completely; I've spoken about this with my very NIMBY mother who lives somewhat nearby and her sentiment is essentially "I'm not going to use it, but it's far enough from me not to be disturbed and if it takes drivers off the Second Narrow's I'm all for it!"

Network A definitely seems like a copy-paste from the average Transit Fantasy thread post. Hastings Line, 41st Line, North Shore Skytrain, Willingdon Line, Poco Extension, Newton Line, it's all there. Very exciting.

I suppose this essentially answers the current topic of this thread, since it's in both Network A and Network B, the next line will be the Hastings Line + North Shore Crossing/Willingdon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #252  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 12:58 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,853
Network A for me, it is the most reasonable and puts quality over quantity which so far has been a winning strategy.

Interesting that the Arbutus street car / LRT is missing from both scenarios.

Network B seems a little aimless and cluttered.

Also want to know more about the regional routes, hopefully some of those are heavy rail (and hopefully service expansion of the WCE is still considered).
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #253  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 1:30 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant
Posts: 6,884
The Willingdon Expo Line extension would also act as downtown relief line. With very limited stops coming out of North Van, you could allocate 2 out of 3 trains to Willingdon, which would give a peak capacity of at least 16 000 pphpd. And if the limiting factor for Expo Line capacity are the switches at Waterfront, then maybe having branch lines going to North Van and Burnaby instead, increases the current theoretical capacity. Maybe closer to 30 000 pphpd?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #254  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 2:01 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 8,433
I still think it's best to limit the Expo's reach after Langley. A network works best with redundancies, and having one big multi-branching SkyTrain line for half the metro doesn't offer any.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #255  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 2:03 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,389
Agreed, Network A for me too.

I don't understand the thinking behind LRT on both 41st and 49th under Network B , though could be BRT.

Here's a link to the relevant documents:

Transport 2050 Technical Documents
https://engagetranslink.ca/transport...ical-documents

Last edited by officedweller; Apr 20, 2021 at 2:14 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #256  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 2:30 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diegotheartist1 View Post
I'd love to see the Expo Line being extended from Waterfront Station to the north shore via Hastings & Second Narrows. As for others, UBC and PoCo extensions are definitely a priority
Build a different line, if you want your fantasy extension.

Having so much of the system tied to one line is a recipe for disaster. One link in the chain goes down and whoo-hoo it's the six-o'clock news.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #257  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 2:49 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,853
The North Shore / Hastings / Willingdon project should not be an extension of the Expo Line but an entirely new line that branches south of Burrard Inlet. That was the Hastings branch could be further extended west into downtown past Waterfront.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #258  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 4:44 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 38,389
Agreed, no need to go to Waterfront Station.
Burrard is overloaded - so maybe Granville Station with a new access point from the Bay Parkade development
or between Vancouver City Centre Station and Granville Station with a linking concourse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #259  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 4:50 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 16,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Agreed, no need to go to Waterfront Station.
Burrard is overloaded - so maybe Granville Station with a new access point from the Bay Parkade development
or between Vancouver City Centre Station and Granville Station with a linking concourse.
Yes, I was actually thinking of having a gas town station, and then from there it has a station at Granville that could create a true major hub with Granville Expo Line Station and Canada Line Van City Centre Station. After that a couple more stations could be added all the way to Stanley Park / English Bay.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/306346...h/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0...lhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #260  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2021, 4:59 AM
GeeCee's Avatar
GeeCee GeeCee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 2,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Yes, I was actually thinking of having a gas town station, and then from there it has a station at Granville that could create a true major hub with Granville Expo Line Station and Canada Line Van City Centre Station. After that a couple more stations could be added all the way to Stanley Park / English Bay.
Given the soil quality (and likely underground utility locations) in the area, I think a Gastown station would prove to be quite difficult anywhere north of Hastings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:48 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.