Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46
Putting it somewhere where people are.
The boonies are bad for any mass transit option because the masses don't live there.
What makes GO work is that there are significant cities of hundreds of thousands in the orbit of the GTA that have need to get into/out of the city.
Outside the municipal limits, Ottawa has, what? Arnprior? Hawkesbury? Smiths Falls? Carleton Place?
|
I asked the question to highlight where and what is needed.
Where would the bus stop? Just in those places, or would there be intermediate stops?
How often?
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa
So what would compel you to take the bus into the city? Why would you leave your truck behind and walk to the closest main road and stand in the cold waiting for a bus?
I don’t think the rural areas around Ottawa are particularly different than other cities. They are very car centric and most people own cars. The existing limited bus services (usually a morning bus into Ottawa and an afternoon bus back) have a very niche market. Anything that would attract significant ridership would require people who own cars to leave them at home.
|
As someone who is retired, my truck moves when I need it for truck things. If it does not need to be hauled or towed, it does not move.
My car, I use for groceries or other things.
So, I am a bad example. My wife on the other hand would be a good example as she has a regular job. She works in an office so a bus that would get her into town better than her car is what is needed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46
Mostly I don't understand the concept writ large.
One lives in a distant small town/rural area because they want the low cost for amount of space/low service/low tax lifestyle. That's fine, but I see no reason why we should impose these services/costs on people who:
a) Don't really want them; or
b) Want an suburban/urban lifestyle subsidized by someone else.
Group (a) is easy. They have no interest in the service or paying for it. They'll just transport themselves into the city and accept that living in the boonies means that you get lots of space and minimal services.
Group (b) is a group of inveterate whiners who want everything and someone else to pay for it. Subsidizing a group who will inefficiently use services bleeds out more productive uses of money. Asking them to take on the whole cost means that the service is DOA, because stuff that doesn't scale needs a critical mass of people to make work. Which will basically destroy the concept of rural living, because people flock to the exurbs when they can. Might as well keep them closer to the city to make things more efficient.
|
You highlight something that should be said.
I do not think a rural commuter system should be funded by Ottawa. It should be funded by the places it goes and the province. Kind of like how Regaud, QC no longer has commuter service to Montreal.