Quote:
Originally Posted by jenike
I'm not sure if anyone heard the interview done on CBC information morning on July 2 with Mayor Ann Seamans regarding the whole Riverview town council's project and the independent Riverview Energy Centre project.
I listened to this and couldn't help but scratch my head in disbelief. Here is the link to the podcast if anyone wants to listen. It's about 10 minutes long if I remember correctly.
http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorning...o-rec-centres/
|
Mayor Seamans didn't do a tremendously good job explaining the town's position, but that's OK. I've been interviewed in the media before several times and it is easy to get off message when you have a microphone shoved in your face. Nervousness and mike fright can get in the way of logical thought and easily understandable explanations of complex issues.
- In essence, the town of Riverview has their own vision for a new recreational facility for the town, and this facility is intended to be the centrepiece for the proposed Mill Creek development. This is a fine idea.
- As an incorporated municipality, Riverview would have to be able to justify the need for this facility before asking more senior levels of government for financial assistance. In essence, they need a business plan, which is the reason why they are conducting a feasibility study. It may seem like a waste of time and money, but they need to do this to satisfy the requirements of the federal and provincial governments. Riverview has to follow different rules than a well capitalized private corporation would in order to secure financing. This feasibility study doesn't bother me.
- The proposed Energy Centre is a bit of a fly in the ointment for the town in this process. The Energy Centre is an especially ambitious project backed by a modest not-for-profit group which probably does not have sufficient capitalization to proceed. It will likely never move forward, but the Energy Centre does serve as a significant source of confusion and controversy for the town. This confusion exists not only for the citizens of the town but for other levels of government as well. I mean, why would the feds cough up a few million if there is the possibility that a private group might be able to accomplish the same thing for less money? The Energy Centre group has just made things a lot more complicated for Mayor Seamans.
The Energy Centre project would do nothing for the proposed Mill Creek development, as it would be located elsewhere in the town. Mill Creek is a pet project for the town. The proposed Energy Centre could in fact jeopardize the whole Mill Creek development, because the town's envisioned recreational facility is intended to be the centrepiece for Mill Creek. This probably explains the ambivalence of the town towards the proposed Energy Centre. This is understandable, because the Mill Creek project, as envisioned, in many ways
is the future of Riverview. The Energy Centre therefore is in some ways a threat to the town.
To her credit, Mayor Seamans did say that if the Energy Centre were to proceed, that the town would abandon their own plans for a new recreational centre. This is only prudent. In the meantime, I think there is a strong likelihood that the Energy Centre group will get nowhere with their project. I think they lack the backers necessary to move this project forward. I believe the current promoters of this project are well intentioned dreamers who are in well over their head. The town therefore should assume the Energy Centre will fail, and should carry on with their feasibility study and follow all the usual courses of action necessary to allow the Mill Creek project to proceed. Mill Creek is more likely to happen than the proposed Energy Centre.
I could be wrong, but I have seen no evidence so far that there is anyone with deep pockets backing the Energy Centre. I think the best thing for everyone involved is for the Energy Centre group to give up on their independent plans and to formally back the Mill Creek project. In turn, the town should appoint some of the Energy Centre backers to the committee overseeing the Mill Creek project and to seriously consider some of the Energy Centre components as part of the Mill Creek development. This would be a win-win situation for everyone.