HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4041  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2015, 10:56 PM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
I wonder at what point the individuals who actually planned the thing are tossed into the fray.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4042  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 12:03 AM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,759
Tens of millions to replace the concourse!? Wow. Never thought it would be that much.

A year or two ago I seem to remember our own TrueViking saying that significant extra costs would arise with IGF. Wonder if there will be any other additional flaws that will be have to be corrected in the stadium?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4043  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 1:21 AM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,983
I am just getting ready to go to work tonight and just heard an ad for Stewart Olson Construction on the radio (CJOB) saying how they do good work in Winnipeg and realize that I have heard it a few times this week.

Now with the cross claim coming out I have to wonder on the timing of their ads. Do they think their reputation is tarnished with the stadium and convention center (hotel) projects?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4044  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 2:31 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,888
I would guess that part of the cost for the concourse reconstruction is going to be hauling out the debris by hand. The weight restrictions which this is being done to address likely limit the use of any equipment to haul out the concrete as it is removed. It will also be interesting how they get the new concrete into the concourse.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4045  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 8:12 PM
cllew cllew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,983
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
I would guess that part of the cost for the concourse reconstruction is going to be hauling out the debris by hand. The weight restrictions which this is being done to address likely limit the use of any equipment to haul out the concrete as it is removed. It will also be interesting how they get the new concrete into the concourse.
Would the concrete not be pumped into the concourse?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4046  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 9:10 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
They will also need to build structural forms to brace the new concrete up whilst they place rebar and pour the new slabs. THIS with the fit-up all done undernearth will require likely taking it all out placing in the forms. Doing the work. Then placing it all back. THIS will be the part that is likely to cost Millions of $$$.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4047  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 10:08 PM
biguc's Avatar
biguc biguc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: pinkoland
Posts: 11,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by blueandgoldguy View Post
Tens of millions to replace the concourse!? Wow. Never thought it would be that much.

A year or two ago I seem to remember our own TrueViking saying that significant extra costs would arise with IGF. Wonder if there will be any other additional flaws that will be have to be corrected in the stadium?
That he did. He made a really strong case against Ray Wan as the architect. As he put it, there are a handful of firms qualified to design stadiums. Obviously, a discount strip-mall architect from Winnipeg isn't one of them.

Ray Wan flew too close to the sun and he's going to get burned for it. Hopefully not too badly, though. The B3 folks should have known better when they hired him.
__________________
no
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4048  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2015, 10:30 PM
Danny D Oh Danny D Oh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
I am just getting ready to go to work tonight and just heard an ad for Stewart Olson Construction on the radio (CJOB) saying how they do good work in Winnipeg and realize that I have heard it a few times this week.

Now with the cross claim coming out I have to wonder on the timing of their ads. Do they think their reputation is tarnished with the stadium and convention center (hotel) projects?
They also won the bid to rebuild the old residence at the U of M, name of which I am blanking on right now, but were consistently far behind on deadlines and eventually the U of M re-tendered it.

They have downsized their operation in Winnipeg in the last couple years. I'm wondering if they'll even be interested in this market once they are done with the Convention Centre. Lost a lot of money here, depending on how the lawsuits settle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4049  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2015, 7:38 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by biguc View Post
That he did. He made a really strong case against Ray Wan as the architect. As he put it, there are a handful of firms qualified to design stadiums. Obviously, a discount strip-mall architect from Winnipeg isn't one of them.

Ray Wan flew too close to the sun and he's going to get burned for it. Hopefully not too badly, though. The B3 folks should have known better when they hired him.
Was that their decision or had David Asper decided that for them as well! (kind of a good will gesture after getting his cheque for the great design and location he chose)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4050  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2015, 8:37 PM
North_Regina_Boy North_Regina_Boy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Regina, SK (formerly Saskatoon)
Posts: 1,474
I am so happy that the New Mosaic Stadium was designed by HKS Architecture firm.

You can't say their resume is bad:

AT&T Stadium
Lucus Oil Stadium
Vikings Stadium

to name a few.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4051  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 2:55 AM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by North_Regina_Boy View Post
I am so happy that the New Mosaic Stadium was designed by HKS Architecture firm.

You can't say their resume is bad:

AT&T Stadium
Lucus Oil Stadium
Vikings Stadium

to name a few.
Basically this. You pay to play. Don't hire some Firm that makes Bulk Barns and Extreme Pitas for a stucco strip mall to build a large sporting complex. There is a reason many firms specialize in this because you need a specific way to approach these projects but it can easily be copied else where once you figure that way out.

You wouldn't hire a firm that builds suburban bungalows to design and build you a skyscraper, why they thought using some random local firm shows the flaws in being to much of a homer for big ticket projects like this. Get the best for the job who offers you the best price, does not matter if they are from Winnipeg or Warsaw, Poland.

IGF numbers didn't make much sense. The roof was a significant cost which left pennies for everything else so it is no surprise to see these issues now.

I moaned years ago that the materials they were using were crap. The project had many red flags from the start but I think people got lost on being upset with the botched timeline versus the components of the structure being put into place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4052  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 3:11 AM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
Basically this. You pay to play. Don't hire some Firm that makes Bulk Barns and Extreme Pitas for a stucco strip mall to build a large sporting complex. There is a reason many firms specialize in this because you need a specific way to approach these projects but it can easily be copied else where once you figure that way out.

You wouldn't hire a firm that builds suburban bungalows to design and build you a skyscraper, why they thought using some random local firm shows the flaws in being to much of a homer for big ticket projects like this. Get the best for the job who offers you the best price, does not matter if they are from Winnipeg or Warsaw, Poland.

IGF numbers didn't make much sense. The roof was a significant cost which left pennies for everything else so it is no surprise to see these issues now.

I moaned years ago that the materials they were using were crap. The project had many red flags from the start but I think people got lost on being upset with the botched timeline versus the components of the structure being put into place.
What specific materials are crap? Give specific examples otherwise I'm inclined to believe you are making things up.

Maybe it isn't the composition of the concrete on the concourse that is questionable but the conditions under which it was set.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4053  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 4:12 AM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
For what it's worth, HOK Sport came up with the general design concept for IGF and Ray Wan drove it home... I didn't think it was as though this project was designed start to finish by Wan.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4054  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 2:23 PM
CoryB CoryB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 5,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by cllew View Post
Would the concrete not be pumped into the concourse?
From the closest you can get a concrete truck to some of those points on the concourse would be a long run. Is that even possible?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4055  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 3:00 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 7,229
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoryB View Post
From the closest you can get a concrete truck to some of those points on the concourse would be a long run. Is that even possible?
1000'+ is quite doable. The limits are more on height than linear.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4056  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 7:37 PM
ba_split ba_split is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 33
Its seems the BIGGEST issue is the cracking concrete---Has anyone heard why this has happened? I've heard they have to move Beer Kegs by hand as no equipment is allowed in the concourse.

Is it something as simple as the Conc. too thin?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4057  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 8:30 PM
blueandgoldguy blueandgoldguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by ba_split View Post
Its seems the BIGGEST issue is the cracking concrete---Has anyone heard why this has happened? I've heard they have to move Beer Kegs by hand as no equipment is allowed in the concourse.

Is it something as simple as the Conc. too thin?
Well according to one poster it's because the materials are crap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4058  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 8:57 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ba_split View Post
Its seems the BIGGEST issue is the cracking concrete---Has anyone heard why this has happened? I've heard they have to move Beer Kegs by hand as no equipment is allowed in the concourse.

Is it something as simple as the Conc. too thin?
There is any number of reasons that concrete can crack, and not all of them are of an immediate structural concern.

The concourses are likely (although I don't know for sure) steel deck with concrete topping. In this case, if the decking is strong enough to span on it's on, the concrete is just the finish, and not important structurally speaking.

The bigger concern is likely the durability of the concrete and long term corrosion of the steel deck. The cracks are in an exterior environment which allows for freeze/thaw action that will eventually make a mess of the surface.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4059  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 9:24 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
I don't think the issue in the upper deck is the concrete itself. It's the waterproof membrane underneath. I think that's why they are saying they won't know the extent until it is exposed. They also have to re-pour slopes into the floors and create a drainage system.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4060  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2015, 9:31 PM
trueviking's Avatar
trueviking trueviking is offline
surely you agree with me
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 13,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
For what it's worth, HOK Sport came up with the general design concept for IGF and Ray Wan drove it home... I didn't think it was as though this project was designed start to finish by Wan.
That's not actually true. HOK was let go at a very preliminary stage. Preliminary bowl layout as I understand. They were gone long before a site was even chosen.

They were not even paid for the work they did, which is an indication of the level of their involvement....among other things.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.