NEW YORK | 30 Hudson Yards (North Tower) | 1,296 FT | 92 FLOORS - Page 144

Zerton · #**2861** Posted **Oct 17, 2016, 7:44 PM**

Were those last two floors mechanical?

NYguy · #**2862** Posted **Oct 17, 2016, 8:42 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zerton

Were those last two floors mechanical?

A comparison with diagrams...

__

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy

streetscaper · #**2863** Posted **Oct 18, 2016, 9:23 AM**

From this past weekend... Looking northwest from the Financial District

FW4A2304 by Kevin Leclerc, on Flickr

FW4A2303 by Kevin Leclerc, on Flickr

NYguy · #**2864** Posted **Oct 18, 2016, 3:25 PM**

Such a massive tower. Such a great city. Who says you can't mix the old and the new?

streetscaper · #**2865** Posted **Oct 19, 2016, 3:56 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by NYguy

Such a massive tower. Such a great city. Who says you can't mix the old and the new?

Agreed!!

I shot this pic about a year ago from Jersey City Heights... 10 Hudson Yards (and Midtown in general) was so frickin' massive. Think it's time I go back again for an updated pic with all the HY towers U/C (especially 30 HY).

FW4A0475-2 by Kevin Leclerc, on Flickr

NYguy · #**2866** Posted **Oct 20, 2016, 12:29 AM**

OCTOBER 18, 2016

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

streetscaper · #**2867** Posted **Oct 20, 2016, 5:35 AM**

Great Photos NYguys

streetscaper · #**2868** Posted **Oct 20, 2016, 5:36 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by streetscaper

I shot this pic about a year ago from Jersey City Heights... 10 Hudson Yards (and Midtown in general) was so frickin' massive. Think it's time I go back again for an updated pic with all the HY towers U/C (especially 30 HY).

FW4A0475-2 by Kevin Leclerc, on Flickr

I went back today, 11 months later!

FW4A3657 by Kevin Leclerc, on Flickr

antinimby · #**2869** Posted **Oct 20, 2016, 11:14 AM**

You should do that every year now.

BTW, did they stop lighting up the top of 383 Madison (formerly the Bear Stearns tower)?

TechTalkGuy · #**2870** Posted **Oct 20, 2016, 6:43 PM**

Nice shot showing the difference in a year!

NYCLuver · #**2871** Posted **Oct 21, 2016, 2:53 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by antinimby

You should do that every year now.

BTW, did they stop lighting up the top of 383 Madison (formerly the Bear Stearns tower)?

Some days its lit, some others its not.

NYguy · #**2872** Posted **Oct 22, 2016, 2:48 AM**

mg5thave

emfravel · #**2873** Posted **Oct 22, 2016, 3:55 AM**

Gobsmacked. It's turning out so fantastic!

Shwayze1994 · #**2874** Posted **Oct 22, 2016, 11:53 PM**

Looks like we might be looking at a future AT@T tower

TechTalkGuy · #**2875** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 12:28 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shwayze1994

Looks like we might be looking at a future AT@T tower

We are looking at the future midtown skyline and as we all know, construction is like air: we love it so much, it will never end!

Shwayze1994 · #**2876** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 1:56 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by TechTalkGuy

We are looking at the future midtown skyline and as we all know, construction is like air: we love it so much, it will never end!

Well I'm curious if the soon impending merger of Time Warner and At@t might effect the tower in any way.

chris08876 · #**2877** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 9:04 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shwayze1994

Well I'm curious if the soon impending merger of Time Warner and At@t might effect the tower in any way.

With so many assets in NY with regards to Time Warner, the merger might actually benefit the city as more space will be needed. I doubt at&T would relocate Time Warner to Texas, where its HQ is at. If anything, you'd see more AT&T entities move to NY as thats where the center of power and talent is at.

JDRCRASH · #**2878** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 12:03 PM**

What's fascinating to me is how the buildings just seem to "float" above the rail yard.

Something similar in California would no doubt require a great deal of more engineering to realize.

Dac150 · #**2879** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 4:47 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shwayze1994

Well I'm curious if the soon impending merger of Time Warner and At@t might effect the tower in any way.

A lot needs to happen prior to such a deal closing … this tower will likely be topped out and them some if/when the deal is officially done. Not to mention practically all of TimeWarner's competitors are based in Manhattan … AT&T will treat TimeWarner as Comcast does NBC Universal.

NYguy · #**2880** Posted **Oct 23, 2016, 4:58 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shwayze1994

Well I'm curious if the soon impending merger of Time Warner and At@t might effect the tower in any way.

It won't have any effect. The tower is already full, so Related just gave up the space it planned to take for another tenant. Like Coach and Wells Fargo, Time Warner owns the space it is taking at the tower (for HBO, CNN, etc.). Now, I could see something going on at 50 Hudson, but not here.