Quote:
Originally Posted by JustSomeGuyWho
I really don't understand your position (that you've stated before) ... which sounds to me like, if you don't like it then suck it (because we are a "world-renowned university"). Whatever. The fields at Penn Park weren't even part of Penn until relatively recently. Penn's a great school, no doubt, and an integral part of Philadelphia's future but that doesn't mean he isn't allowed to have an opinion about how that land is being utilized.
|
I don't intend to beat this poor dead horse anymore
, but since you stated that you don't understand my position, let me attempt to clarify:
I never said that "he isn't allowed to have an opinion about how that land is being utilized." In fact, what I literally said to Pennsgrant was: "Well, you're entitled to your opinion, . . . " (
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/show...postcount=1212). He repeatedly has expressed, somewhat pejoratively, that this land should be the site of a major league ballpark and skyscrapers, instead of Penn Park and the Penn/CHOP clinical/research complex. I disagree, and believe that his assessment significantly underestimates Penn's and CHOP's contributions to that location in particular, and to the city's economy and reputation in general.
Hope that makes it a bit clearer, but I suspect that everyone else has just about had their fill of this discussion.
And with that, it's Miller Time!