Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook
Agree with this. But where are the poor going to go? Because significant portions of the city will gentrify long before we ever solve the problem of poverty. Which is probably impossible to solve. Poverty will always exist in lesser or greater degrees.
|
It's kind of unfortunate, and I suppose symbolic of the static approach we have towards poverty in this country, that remedies for improving the city are always discussed through the lens of gentrification (on this blog). As though displacing a lot of people is inevitable and desirable as part of large-scale real estate investment. I do think that attracting and retaining more higher-income people is good for the city, and in some sense, is an avenue for addressing the acute concentration of poverty in Philadelphia since it builds up the tax base in support of services that benefit lower-income residents. I also recognize that structural economic issues and national and state-level policies render local policies, by comparison, feeble in their potential impact to help realize higher real wages for poor people. But moving poor and rich people around into a new geographical configuration and calling that success just seems like a pretty sad standard to aim for. Anyway, I know it's getting a bit off topic so all I will say on that. Also am not intending that as an attack on anyone.